Biometric ID Cards – 2008

Biometric ID Cards are now once again under consideration by Keir Starmer’s Labour government having being heavily promoted since 2023 by Tony Blair, William Hague and others including the misleadingly named ‘Labour Together‘ right-wing think tank – once directed by Morgan McSweeney who became Starmer’s campaign director – and who he appointed as Labour’s chief of staff when he became leader – and McSweeney became Downing Street Chief of Staff in October 2024.

Biometric ID Cards - 2008

Until 2008, Britain had only introduced identity cards at times of war. They were scrapped in 1919 but kept on rather longer after World War Two when they were only abolished in 1952.

Biometric ID Cards - 2008
Luna House was built 1976-7 by Denis Crump & Partners and is rented by the Home Office from a Greek businessman whose company is based in Monaco. They added an R to its name.

While the British people were prepared to put up with them in wartime, identity cards were always viewed as fundamentally un-British, incompatible with our ideas of civil liberties and freedom. We contrasted our free society with others abroad where citizens could be stopped at any time on the streets and required to produce their papers – and chilling scenes of the Gestapo doing so were frequently invoked in popular culture. We were proud of not being a police state, but increasingly we are now moving more and more in that direction.

Biometric ID Cards - 2008

Now the idea is firmly back on the political agenda, there have been two major protests in London against the introduction of these ID cards. Unfortunately for different reasons I’ve not managed to cover either of them. A third protest is coming up in December and I hope to be there.

A petition to Parliament against their introduction has already received around 3 million signatures and will be debated on 8 December 2025. The initial government response is “We will introduce a digital ID within this Parliament to help tackle illegal migration, make accessing government services easier, and enable wider efficiencies. We will consult on details soon.” You can read more at Big Brother Watch.

Biometric ID Cards were introduced under the Identity Cards Act 2006, which came into force on 25th November 2008, when they became compulsory for all non-EU students and spouses applying for or renewing visas for study or marriage. They were to be required shortly for all foreign nationals in the UK and also to be rolled out to other groups including students who want a student loan by 2010. And from 2011 you were to be reqquired to have one – and have your details on that database – if you wanted to renew or get a passport.

Biometric ID Cards - 2008

London NoBorders and NO2ID (their website I linked to in 2008 is now a gaming site) marked the occasion with a picket outside the UK headquarters of the Border and Immigration Agency at Lunar House in Croydon.

It was, as I noted, a bitterly cold day and “on Wellesley Road a biting Siberian wind seared the demonstrators outside Lunar House. It seemed appropriate that such a freezing blast should surround the UK headquarters of the Border and Immigration Agency and indeed be generated by its twenty stories of the grim early 1970s office complex. After all its raison d’être is to give would-be immigrants and asylum seeks an extremely cold reception.

Biometric ID Cards - 2008

It’s impossible to think about the introduction of ID cards without thinking of Orwell and ‘1984’ (though I also had another author in mind when I wrote of it as “a warning of things to come for all of us in a Brave New Britain of state surveillance and control whose infrastructure is increasingly with us through security cameras, the interception of mobile phone signals and electronic communications and the planned introduction of universal ID cards.“)

Although New Labour had few worries about the descent into totalitarianism, our other main political parties had clear reservations, though for the Conservatives they were intrusive but more importantly “ineffective and enormously expensive.” The Lib-Dems were also opposed to them and under the coalition the Identity Documents Act 2010 scrapped the National Identity register and the database and plans for future issues of cards, although they remained as residence permits for foreign nationals.

Also present at the protest was one man, David Mery, fortunate to be still alive – unlike Jean Charles de Menezes. Like that innocent Brazilian electrician six days earlier he had gone into Stockwell Underground Station in 2005 and been suspected of being a terrorist, but this time the police didn’t shoot first and ask questions later. Though having established he wasn’t carrying a bomb they still arrested him and put him through the mill rather than simply apologising on the spot and releasing him.

As I wrote, “his treatment in the months and years following the event can most favourably be described as Kafkaesque. He finally (or at least probably) succeeded in having both his fingerprints and DNA record removed from the police databases, but it took over two years of fighting. His blog and articles are essential reading for anyone who wonders why civil liberties are important.

A few more pictures at Protest at ID cards start.


FlickrFacebookMy London DiaryHull PhotosLea ValleyParis
London’s Industrial HeritageLondon Photos

All photographs on this page are copyright © Peter Marshall.
Contact me to buy prints or licence to reproduce.


Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party

Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party: On Sunday 7th August, 2005 my working day began with a Latin carnival and ended with a not quite Boston tea party. Sandwiched between the two was a very varied protest against new laws passed by the New Labour government to restrict the right to protest under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.


Carnaval del Pueblo – Southwark

Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party

The Carnaval Del Pueblo procession by London’s Latin American communities was this year starting from Potters Fields, an empty cleared site between the GLA headquarters then in More London and Tower Bridge. I photographed a number of those taking part in their varied costumes but found it hard to get more interesting pictures as the groups were more spread out.

Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party

The pictures, thanks to the various different traditions across South and Central America are very colourful but it was impossible for me to identify the different countries and groups they represented. Most of these countries became colonies of Spain and Portugal and influences from there blended with more traditional indigenous costumes and practices.

Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party

Spain was of course traditionally a major enemy of Britain, and this country supported many of the movements to gain independence from Spain in the 19th century as a number of memorials across London testify. Though much of that support was more aimed at getting some of the riches of the continent than freeing the people and was for middle-class movements by people of largely European orgin rather than for the indigenous people – and remains so in UK foreign policy today.

Carnaval, Protest For Protest & A Tea Party

Eventually the procession moved off, on its way to a Latin American Festival in Burgess Park, but I had to leave them as they passed London Bridge station to catch the Jubilee line to Westminster.

It’s hard to choose just a few pictures from so many – so please click on the link to the August page of My London Diary and scroll down to see more.


The Right to Protest – Parliament Square, Westminster

Under New Labour a number of restrictions were introduced which curtailed free speech and the rights of citizens, including a number of measures that they had opposed before they came to power. Some were just been a part of the general trend to central control begun under Thatcher, but others were brought on by the threat of terrorism and even more by the growth of opposition to some government policies, in particular the huge opposition to the invasion of Iran.

This protest followed the passage of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 which prohibited “unauthorised demonstrations within a one kilometre radius of Parliament Square” and was one of several in early August 2005 in which protesters were arrested.

Most people believe that this law had been brought in largely to end the ongoing protest by Brian Haw who had the been protesting in Parliament Square since 2nd June 2001, and whose presence embarrassed Tony Blair and other government ministers. Careless drafting meant the law did not apply to him, though on appeal the court decided it had been meant to and that was good enough, but by then Haw had got permission for a smaller area of protest on the pavement. Despite continuing and often illegal harassment by police and others the protest continued even after Haw died in 2011, continued by Barbara Tucker until May 2013.

At the protezt Brian held up a large poster with a quotation from a speech by US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice in January 2005, when she said “If a person cannot walk into the middle of the town square and express his or her views without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm, then that person is living in a fear society, not a free society. We cannot rest until every person living in a ”fear society” has finally won their freedom.

The protests in Parliament Square while I was there took various forms. People held up posters, placards and banners; Pax Christi held a service; clowns clowned – all were warned by police they were committing an offence – and five or six were arrested, rather at random from the hundreds present, probably because they argued with police. I got warned for just being there, despite showing the officer my UK Press Card.

Eventually there was some discussion among those taking part and people agreed they would lie down for a short protest together on the grass in Parliament Square.

More pictures on the the link on the August page of My London Diary


The Westminster Tea Party – Time for Tobin Tax, Westminster Bridge

At the end of the Parliament Square protest everyone had been invited to join another short protest about to take place on Westminster Bridge. People gathered there and held tea bags, used here as a political statement against corporate power and in favour of elected governments calling for the introduction of a ‘Tobin Tax’.

Nobel Prize economist James Tobin had in 1972 proposed a small tax on currency transactions to cushion exchange rate volatility by ending speculation, increasingly now carried out by ‘high frequency’ computer algorithms and now relying in AI. It was a development of earlier ideas proposed in the 1930s by John Maynard Keynes.

The idea of a Tobin Tax was taken up by global justice organisations at the start of this century as a way to finance projects to aid the global South such as the Millennium Development goals. In part this came from the Fair Trade movement which gives growers and other producers a fair return for their work. One of its most successful areas has been in promoting fairly traded tea. Once only available from specialist agencies such as the sadly now defunct Traidcraft this is now stocked on many supermarket shelves – as too are Fair Trade certified coffee and chocolate.

More pictures on the the link on the August page of My London Diary