Defend the Flag

There are some events I cover where I have little in common with those taking part, and the ‘Defend the Flag’ march organised by the ‘South East Alliance’ (SEA) was one of these. The SEA is a group that has emerged from various people who have become dissatisfied with the EDL, where there has been a considerable amount of falling out over the activities of a few of the leaders, particularly ‘Tommy Robinson’, particularly since some spectacular failures such as the march at Walthamstow last September. Many others in the various ‘patriotic’ or right-wing movements have long expressed dissatisfaction with the EDL for various reasons both personally to me and in the various right-wing forums on the web, and I’ve reported some of these when covering events on My London Diary.

© 2013, Peter Marshall
Union Flags and Unionist Flags on the march

I’ve always tried to cover events in a fair and unbiased way, to show clearly what happened at them, and to convey the views of those taking part. Partly because I think it the duty of a journalist, but also because I think it is the most effective way to expose extremist views for what they are. It doesn’t mean not making my own views clear, but I try to separate these from the accurate reporting.

At this march,  I noticed that as well as those taking part from organisations linked to Northern Ireland, including men wearing the tie or badge of the Somme Association , there were also several wearing British National Party ties and badges. This isn’t something I’ve previously noted at recent right-wing marches (where dress has tended to be more informal) and I mentioned both in my account and the captions to photographs – as you can see in Defend the Union Flag on My London Diary.

© 2013, Peter Marshall
Members of ‘Friends of the Somme’, with at right a man wearing a BNP tie

This upset another of the BNP badge and tie wearers enough to make him complain to the agency that originally carried my pictures for the event.  Of course there were no grounds for any complaint. If you protest on the streets you do so in the hope of getting publicity for the cause you are supporting and are encouraging people to report on  your actions and publish photographs of them, and you can certainly have no expectation of privacy. If you don’t want people to know you are a member of the BNP then don’t wear the badge or tie.

Along with the other photographers I had been asked by one of the organisers to keep out of the actual march, and although I felt it was an unreasonable request I didn’t make an issue of it. There were just one or two pictures that I could only take from inside the march, and I went in briefly and did so without problems, but the rest of the time I worked from one or other side.

© 2013, Peter Marshall
Jim Dowson, Britain First’s Northern Ireland organiser, who once headed
fund-raising for the BNP, speaking

To me the march and the rally which followed appeared to be a peaceful and reasonably well-ordered event. Unlike at some previous right-wing events I didn’t get abused, threatened or spat at by anyone, though there were a few personal comments but the worst thing I was called was a ‘commie photographer’ who worked for ‘Searchlight’.

I’m a socialist who has never belonged to any of various communist parties around and never worked for Searchlight, but don’t take being accused of either as an insult, just a symptom of the paranoia some on the extreme right suffer from. And if Searchlight would pay the agency they could use my work just as the Guardian, Sunday Times, Jewish Chronicle and other publications around the world have done. So far the only sale I’m aware of for any of my pictures from this not very newsworthy event has been in Brazil.

Later I learnt from other photographers that my impression of the march as peaceful was not entirely true. While I was photographing the front of the march opposite Parliament, just down Parliament St a hundred yards of so away, a small group of marchers threatened several photographers and attacked one of them.

It’s always a problem that you can’t be everywhere and can’t see or photograph everything, even at a relatively small event like this, with a little over a hundred people taking part. I hadn’t had an opportunity to talk to the other photographers about it as I’d rushed away shortly before the event was due to finish to another event. But once I knew I posted a correction to the story.

I’m unhappy with any group that tries to annex one of our national flags for its own purposes – whether in Northern Ireland or in the rest of the United Kingdom. It seems to me that a national flag should be something that unites a nation rather than divides it.  It should be a national flag and not a tribal or factional one.  And of course our national flag is the Union Flag. I was no fan of the Olympics, but it was good to see it being proudly carried by teams which reflected the great wealth of diversity in our country.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

There was a certain irony too, when watching the solemn laying of wreaths by the representatives of the Somme Association at the Cenotaph commemorating the brave Ulster men who died fighting for their country to think that this monument, designed to commemorate the military dead of the First World War from all across the British Empire, was unveiled for a second time in 1946 to remember those who died in the war against fascism to know that among those watching in the march behind the barriers were those who belong or have belonged to fascist organisations.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Greenwich Riverside

Many years ago, more or less by accident, I came across the riverside walk north from Greenwich on the south bank of the Thames. This was before there was an official ‘Thames Path’ and there were few books containing routes of walks, certainly very little written in any way about areas such as North Greenwich, then a mix of industrial sites, some derelict and other waste land. Of course the footpaths were familiar to locals, many of whom used them on their way to work. But those people who walked for leisure made their way to the greener heights of the North Downs or the wooded areas around London, rather than the grimier regions.

Few of the people I showed the pictures I was taking then appreciated them. At the camera club the judges would largely scratch their heads and wonder why anyone had bothered to take photographs in such places. But I was very aware that we were in a time of rapid transition, moving from being a country based on manufacturing to one depending on services, and that was being accelerated by government policies, and wanted to photograph the process.

The result of this was a project called London’s Industrial Heritage, which became a web site of the same name towards the end of the 1990s. The web design was by my elder son as a surprise birthday present, and generated the site from a set of images and a database file of their captions and locations. It was an ingenious solution, relying on some very long strings in the URLs, but also visually simple and elegant. You can use the interface to select pictures in various ways, and one is by area; of the 23 pictures now on the site, around a dozen are from the riverside walk between Greenwich and the dome at North Greenwich.

© 1982, Peter Marshall
Riverside silos at Greenwich

I had been taking pictures at Lewisham at lunchtime, and wasn’t due in central London for another event until 5.30pm, so it seemed an ideal opportunity to visit the riverside walk again, as I’d heard that a part of it which had been closed for some time had reopened. So I took the bus from Lewisham to North Greenwich. Walking down Drawdock Rd to the Thames, it became clear that the section south from here was still a building site, and the path still closed. I took a little walk along the path around the Dome, until I could get a view of London’s most expensive river crossing, the ‘Dangleway’ or cable car service between North Greenwich and the Royal Victoria Docks.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

I’d decided I didn’t quite have the time to take a ride across (and without my Oyster or a Travelcard it would have been a bit expensive) so I turned around and took the Thames path back into Greenwich – around 3 miles. From Drawdock Rd going south there is at the moment a fairly dull detour by road until you reach a footpath leading back to the river, still helpfully marked as closed by the local authority. Fortunately I had more up-to-date information, and was also able to confirm from a couple walking out of the path that it was now open all the way south to Greenwich.

© 2002, Peter Marshall

In 2002 the area had already become a curious landscape of sand and gravel, and the only change over the next 11 years seems to have been the weather, as you can see from the picture below.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

This image seems somehow to have got a little darker than I made it – but you can see it and the others from the walk on Thames Path Greenwich Partly Open. One recent edition to the path are a number of works by Greenwich Guerillas Knitters.

© 2013, Petr Marshall

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Magnum Failure

I’ve written several times over the years admiring the powerful black and white images of Magnum’s Paolo Pellegrin, and wasn’t surprised to find one of his stories, on an area called ‘The Crescent‘ in Rochester, USA awarded second prize in the recently announced 2013 World Press Photo.  So it came as a shock to read in EPUK News that one of the images included in this was not quite what the photographer had alleged it to be, and that a large section of the text of the story had been taken almost without alteration from a New York Times story published ten years earlier.

EPUK News linked to a feature When Reality Isn’t Dramatic Enough: Misrepresentation in a World Press and Picture of the Year Winning Photo by Michael Shaw, the publisher of the BagNews Notes web site, which gives full details of how and where the picture was made and the various errors in the caption and use of the image – including some comments by the subject of the photograph, Shane Keller.

Briefly, the picture was taken after Pellegrin had asked a student who was assisting him during the Magnum project in Rochester if he could find someone to be photographed holding a gun. It wasn’t taken in the Crescent area, and the man holding the gun was a student with no connection with violence or drug-dealing in the area. Nor, as the caption asserted, had Keller been a Marine Corps sniper – and the gun in the picture is not – as stated – a rifle!

And although the man in the picture offered the photographer his details for captioning, the photographer wasn’t interested – which would appear to imply that he had already decided that the picture was going to be used in a way that did not reflect what it actually showed. The title of the BagNews Notes article suggests that it was the pressure to make stories more dramatic – particularly for the prize contests – which led him to decide he needed a picture that went beyond what reality provided and to set this up.

The article publishes the material from the New York Times together with  that submitted by Pellegrin, and the two are essentially identical. It seems a clear case of copyright infringement let alone plagiarism, and taken with the misuse of the image, it makes clear that what otherwise might have been arguably (if hard to believe) simply a matter of a careless approach to facts and journalistic ethics was a matter of deliberate pre-meditated deception. Not only is it a serious offence by the photographer concerned but it casts doubt on the whole integrity of the Magnum Agency.

Most surprisingly, the same story also won a second place in the Pictures of the Year International Awards, with the particular picture concerned winning first place in the Freelance/Agency category, but the controversy over it did not come into the open following this.

The case seems clear, and certainly demands investigation by Magnum, World Press Photo and POYi. Unless they take appropriate action they too will be sullied by the photographer’s failure, and public confidence in photojournalism and documentary photography will be further eroded.

I’ve never been a great believer in ‘awards’ whether in  photography or other areas. It’s always seemed to me that the real award for making a fine image or a great film is intrinsic in the thing itself, and certainly the kind of awards ceremonies for the Oscars and similar events are both embarrassing in the extreme and actually demean all those involved – whether they win or not. Few of the greatest films have done well at the Oscars, and if the satisfaction of making great works isn’t in itself enough, you probably are not making great works.

Lewisham

© 2013, Peter Marshall

The government has decided to sacrifice Lewisham Hospital as a token gesture over NHS costs, although it seems likely that the costs of closing it will in the longer term be greater than the short-term profit. Lewisham is a successful hospital clinically and financially, and serves a large population in south-east London and it is hardly surprising that the closure plan – removing its essential A&E and Maternity services along with some other children’s services – has caused local outrage, with many thousands on the streets for two major demonstrations – see Save A&E at Lewisham Hospital and Save Lewisham Hospital – as well as many smaller events.

The losses of the local heath area are  nothing to do with Lewisham, but arise from the decision to use private finance to build hospitals in neighbouring areas. The contracts negotiated under PFI reflected the lack of commercial nous in the public sectore, exacerbating what was in any case a disastrous policy, and now the pigeons hatched in Woolwich are coming to roost in Lewisham, at a time when government policy is rapidly privatising our National Health Service.

Around 150 people came to a lunchtime rally at the War Memorial opposite the hospital, where there were short speeches by a large number of people. I scrabbled around in my pocket for my notebook to record their names, only the remember that I had taken it out to write up a protest a couple of days earlier and had left it next to my computer at home. The only paper I had to hand was the small A6 rectangle of scrap paper I’d used to write down my directions for the day – times and places of events, bus numbers etc. I’d written these on the back of a piece of an old letter, and had covered most of the blank side with my pencilled directions.  I had to write the names of the roughly 20 speakers over these in biro.

© 2013, Peter Marshall
One of the speakers was the Mayor of Lewisham

Even when I remember my notebook, writing while taking pictures isn’t too easy. It would be rather easier and a better solution to be able to attach short audio notes to pictures – as you can on some phones. I do carry a small audio recorder, but it’s too fiddly just to record the odd note, and slow to have to look at the frame numbers on the camera back to use them in the recordings. Sometimes I do record longer audio tracks , but then having to search through and hour of audio to find the names takes too long.

You can add audio notes to images on some cameras – and with software on camera phones – but not on the Nikons. Theoretically I can use the buttons on the back to add a message, but it takes ages – and I type in one a year as a copyright message.

© 2013,n Peter Marshall

Taking the pictures of the crowd gave me the opportunity to include the older hospital building in the background, but for some of the best opportunities this also meant pointing my camera directly towards the sun. Being Winter, the sun even in the middle of the day was low, so hard to avoid even using a moderately wide angle.

I think even the manuals that come with Nikon’s professional cameras tell you to take pictures with the sun behind you, but of course this is neither always possible or desirable, and I like working towards the sun. It used to be considered a specialised aspect of photography, contre-jour, but hardly now qualifies as anything out of the ordinary.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

In several of the pictures I was able to make use of the placards that the protesters were holding up as lighting ‘flags’, thus avoiding excessive flare and ghosts, and for some pictures other protesters served the same function.  Digital makes this kind of thing easier, first because you can see immediately if you have got the results but also because it makes the post processing simple – just a quick dash with the adjustment brush in Lightroom to add a little brightness and contrast to the faces and other significant areas in shadow.

The problem with using people as ‘flags’ is that they will move unpredictably  while you are taking pictures. Just as I don’t normally direct the people I’m photographing, I don’t direct those I’m using  to control the lighting.

More pictures on Fight to Save Lewisham Hospital Continues.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Repent!


Police question and take down details of two protesters who have marked the
Old War Office with charcoal crosses and supporters stand in solidarity.

I’d arrived just minutes late to get a picture on Ash Wednesday when two Christian peace activists were  being questioned by police after having scrawled charcoal crosses on the pillars of the Old War Office in Whitehall. More pictures of the whole event at Ash Wednesday – Ministry of Defence.

I’d come down by bus from North London, where I’d been photographing a protest  Victimisation at London Met on a cold pavement outside London Metropolitan University where two employees have been suspended on very dubious grounds. After an hour standing on a cold pavement and another half hour on a bus travelling to Trafalgar Square I needed to pay a brief visit to the toilets there before rushing down Whitehall.

Had I not paused I might have got pictures of those writing on the wall actually being stopped by police. But more likely I would have hurried past just before it happened, on my way to the main body of worshippers at this regular Ash Wednesday event around the Ministry of Defence.

I could instead have travelled by Underground – the earlier protest was very close to Holloway Road station – and would probably have shaved ten minutes off my journey time – and certainly missed this particular part the Ash Wednesday protest. But so long as I’ve time I prefer to travel by bus. The upper deck of a double-decker gives you a great view of London, and on many occasions I’ve seen things happening and got off to take pictures. It’s sometimes frustrating that it’s difficult to get drivers to let you off the bus except at stops (the old Routemasters, now only on a couple of ‘heritage’ routes had a great advantage in this respect.)

It’s even possible to take pictures from the bus, though reflections in the windows are often annoying. But on many journeys buses are about as quick, and they reach places untouched by the tube, often taking you more or less to the door. And a particular advantage for me is that I have a pass that gives me free travel on the buses but not on the Underground or Overground rail. Public transport in London is relatively expensive compared to most cities around the world.

But back to Ash Wednesday, the ritual marking of the buildings is an annual ‘cat and mouse’ game between police and protesters. You know it will happen, but not exactly where and when, with around a third of a mile of wall on three streets and an hour and a half or so.  There are police spaced out at intervals, spread thinly all along the walls, but large gaps allow the protesters to at least start the marking, though I don’t think this year any of them managed to complete the word ‘Repent!’ after making their crosses.


Ash and water on the pavement – impossible to claim it causes any damage

Charcoal – like chalk also often favoured by demonstrators – is easily removed, and this makes charges of ‘criminal damage’ hard to sustain and the costs of the removal miniscule, but is of course chosen because of its connection to Ash Wednesday. Most of the protesters are there to make a completely legal protest, with a service of worship at various ‘stations’ around the Orwellian-named Ministry of Defence, which includes the marking with water and ash in large letters of the word REPENT! on the pavement in front of the main entrance (in some previous years they put their own sackcloth on the pavement to do so.)

© 2013, Peter Marshall
The writing is under the name plate at right – but I failed to photograph it properly

Previously one protester had managed to leave his charcoal mark next to the name plate for the ministry, but it was now surrounded by barriers and police. I didn’t have a long enough lens to get a good picture, and had thought about going back on my way home as the protesters were dispersing and asking to go inside the barriers to take a picture. But I stopped to talk with a police officer a little down the road and then forgot all about it.


Placards also spelt out the message ‘No Trident – Repent’

At the very end of the protest, I missed another protester who had vaulted over the low fence and rushed across the short stretch of grass to write on the wall. She did it while my back was turned as I was photographing the final service a few yards away, and again all I could photograph was the police talking with her. They released her after a few minutes and she vaulted back over the fence to rejoin her friends.

In some previous years I’d experienced just a little hostility photographing this event, being angrily reminded by one person at one point that this was an act of worship. Of course I was trying hard to cover it in a suitably reverent fashion, but my actions had still upset her. A few years on, with now so many of those taking part also taking out their digital cameras and phones and taking pictures, often in a rather more intrusive way than I would have chosen, I had no such problems. Just occasionally there are advantages for photographers in everyone having a camera.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Shaker – 11 Years

On a bitterly cold morning for London – around zero with a noticeable wind, I put on an extra layer and went to photograph in Parliament Square, where around 20 people were holding up banners facing the House of Commons, reminding MPs that London resident Shaker Aamer had been held without trial at Guantanamo for 11 years. You can read more about the protest and see more pictures in Shaker Aamer – 11 Years in Guantanamo on My London Dairy.

The same day we’d had an e-mail from one of my wife’s old school friends in which she’d mentioned the weather where she was living in Canada – where they were having something of a cold spell, with the temperature at 50 degrees below zero. I’m thankful not to be working there, as I was having problems keeping warm in London.  Fortunately it doesn’t get cold enough here to have to worry too much about equipment, which all seems to work OK around zero. I get cold standing around, not so bad if I can keep walking, but I felt for these guys standing holding banners and placards in orange jump-suits, not as warm as the fleece and jacket I was wearing – and black hoods are not as warm or wind-proof as my Polartec hat. Some weren’t even wearing gloves, and I can’t work in cold weather without them, though I can’t find anything really very warm that still lets me work a camera without problems.  My current solution is a pair of thin silk gloves with a second pair of close-knit wool gloves on top, reasonably warm and I can do almost everything with both pairs on; for anything really fiddly I can take off the wool, and the silk still keeps my fingers a bit warmer. Silk gloves on their own are good for when it isn’t too cold, but it doesn’t take long for the shutter release and other controls to make a holes in the tip of the finger. The wool is a bit tougher, though I’ve already got through one pair this winter.

Apart from keeping warm – and at least unlike the protesters I could walk around a bit – I had two main problems. The first is that I’ve photographed so many protests with people in orange suits that it’s hard to find anything new to say, and the second is with the way that the camera reacts to saturated orange and red.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

Even in this small reproduction I think it is clear that there is something wrong with the orange, while the rest of the image looks about correct. Cutting down the saturation would help a little, but the better solution I’ve found in the past is to use an ‘untwisted’ camera profile in Lightroom (or Adobe Raw.)  And I do that with images from the D700, such as the picture below.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

I think the difference is clear, though you can’t assume that the two orange suits were equally intense, there really was quite a range. The lower image was taken on the D700 for which I have ‘untwisted’ profiles which I downloaded several years ago, but I can’t find any for the D800E (there are some on line for the D800, but I can’t get Lightroom to use these.) I’ve tried downloading software that untwists the standard profiles (created because the free Adobe profile editor doesn’t), and it runs to create new profiles, but again I can’t get these to show up in Lightroom.  Having wasted and hour or two I gave up trying to make my own profiles – but if anyone has succeeded for the Nikon D800E I’d like to have copies.

But there is still something that Lightroom can do. In the Camera Calibration panel of the Develop module there are hue and saturation sliders for the Shadows and Red, Green and Blue Primaries.  Here is the result of setting the Red saturation to -20 on the top image.

© 2013, Peter Marshall

On my screen the improvement is very marked. I think there are other small improvements from choosing the Camera Portrait rather than the normal Adobe Standard profile, and also perhaps a very slight tweak of the Red Primary hue.

For this image, the shadows, such as they are, are generally fine, but having discovered the Shadow slider which shifts along a green – magenta scale, I think I may have a solution to a problem I found working in mixed lighting a couple of days later.

Future versions of Lightroom may well omit these controls as Adobe people have stated that the job can be done better by using specific profiles. But for the moment they are still there even if we seldom need them. I’d rather be out making pictures than having to fiddle so much with them.

Nour Kelze

We Brits (though I don’t think we ever think of ourselves as Brits) often like to pride ourselves on our BBC, in some ways the best broadcasting company in the world, and sometimes I think there is some truth in this, also increasingly I find myself turning to other news services to find what is really happening in – for example – the Middle East, and deploring the BBC for its inaccuracy in reporting some UK events which I’ve attended, and its tendency to pitch for the status quo. Often accused of political bias by Tories, its real and utterly consistent bias is to the established order, even if a few of its journalists sometimes try hard to overcome this.

But one thing it’s never done well is photography. It’s too soaked in a logocentric culture to have any real idea about an essentially visual medium, but really it doesn’t try too hard since it just isn’t regarded as of any importance.

Much more often I find myself looking at and listening to features about photography at another public service broadcaster, the USA’s NPR. The latest is a report about Syrian teacher Noor Kelz, an English teacher from Aleppo who has become a war photographer. She started taking pictures on her mobile, but her career was transformed last Autumn by a meeting with Reuter’s photographer Goran Tomasovic.

He “spotted Noor shooting pictures with her cellphone. He trained her for a week on how to use a professional camera, then gave her a few of his cameras to keep. She’s been sending pictures to the agency ever since.

Noor (or Nour) Kelze was wounded in Aleppo a couple of weeks ago, suffering  a broken leg and shrapnel wounds when a tank shell exploded near her and is being treated in hospital in Turkey, but she hopes to be back at the front lines shortly. There are two pictures of her, one with her leg in plaster, on the PetaPixel post about the NPR show.

She appears in a film ‘Not Anymore, A Story Of Revolution – Nour Kilze – Noor Kelze‘ made by Matthew VanDyke who she worked with to raise funds for the Free Syrian Army which is due for release shortly – all I can find at the moment is a short CNN feature on it.

You can see Goran’s work on a blog on the Reuter’s site, where there is also a fine  slideshow of his work from Syria.

WPP Time

It’s the time of year for the usual criticisms of the winning images in World Press Photo. if you’ve not already done so, rather than wade through the whole lot on the official site you might like to look at a slide show of the 18 top winners on Lensculture. And of course you can learn something more about some of them on PDN and the British Journal of Photography site with a stories about Paul Hansen‘s winning image from Gaza City and Spanish photographer Bernat Armangué‘s series of images also from Gaza as well as several other stories.

Paul Hansen was also the winner of  the 2012 Newspaper Photographer of the year in the 70th Pictures of the Year International (POYi), with a portfolio that as well as Gaza covered the mass murders on the Norwegian island of Utoya in July 2011.

I usually go to the the WPP show when it comes to London, but always with a heavy dose of deja-vu, though usually there are pictures that stand out for some reason or other, though often not the major winners. But most of the main themes that produce the most shocking or startling images repeat themselves event if the massacres, famines, floods and earthquakes happen in different parts of the globe, so it’s perhaps not surprising that the images are often similar.

Duckrabbit quotes a Gary Knight ( Chair of  2013 World Press Photo Contest – before he stepped down) quote from ‘A Photo Editor’  and a comment from that site by Mike Moss in a post entitled Cliché on cliché?  But what I found more interesting is the comment made on duckrabbit by Tobias Key on the lighting in the winning image.

As he suggests there is something that seems over-produced about it, as if it was lit by a large soft-box fired by a radio-trigger on the camera. It would have been a powerful picture without the added drama of the lighting, because of the subject matter and viewpoint, but to me the lighting makes it into a film set, or a hyper realistic painting, and for me it weakens the raw impact of the image. I have a suspicion that the effect is partly or mainly from post-processing rather than lighting. Perhaps there is a clever Lightroom pre-set you can buy to do this to your images?

Don’t get me wrong. I admire the photograph and the undoubted courage and skill of Hansen and others who make such images. It’s something I could never do. But perhaps this – and others – work would be better if they turned down the techniques a little and let the subject speak for itself. Of course that way they would almost certainly not win prizes.

Sports Illustrated etc

Sports Illustrated isn’t a magazine I ever read, nor for that matter is Jezebel, so thanks to
(Notes on) Politics, Theory & Photography for drawing my attention to the feature in it,
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue Goes to 7 Continents, Finds Exotic People to Use as Props, which made me both laugh and despair about the abuse it documents. Hard to believe that such pernicious and stereotypical nonsense gets published but it does reinforce the view of those interested in sports as retarded. If it wouldn’t be unfair to Neanderthals I might even employ that term. Seriously I thought stuff like this went out of use years ago, but perhaps I live in a sheltered environment.

It’s also evidence of some pretty poor Photoshop, and reminded me of another page of ‘
17 Mesmerizing Before & After Photoshop GIFs (and again I apologise in advance for exposing you to some poor taste puerile images of women) almost all of which I think qualify as Photoshop disasters. I don’t think there are any that actually improve the images, but most are beyond saving except by throwing a blanket over the model in the studio.

I’m not a prude, and would readily admit to enjoying looking at images of the nude human body and have written about them, but there is something unnatural about the whole of what is misleadingly given the name ‘glamour’. Come to that, much ‘erotic’ photography leaves me uninterested and certainly un-aroused, except occasionally to laughter at the more preposterous examples. It’s certainly hard to take the work of some of those well-known French photographers taking ‘photo de charme’ seriously event when their work sells for high prices in the art market.

Last week too I followed a link to some newly produced commercially available Lightroom pre-sets.  More curious than anything about why anyone would want to buy pre-sets when you can set up your own for free – it’s one of the essential features of Lightroom and easy to do. It led me to a video part of which took a wholly healthy looking woman’s face and turned it into a decidedly unnatural glowing porcelain. I’ll spare you the link.

Gabriele Basilico (1944-2013)

Italian photographer Gabriele Basilico who died on Wednesday in Milan where he was born was not as well-known in the UK as he should have been, perhaps because the area in which he worked, the urban landscape is not generally highly regarded in this country. Although I went to several exhibitions of his work in Paris (for example Vertical Moscow), I can’t recall having seen one in the UK.

There is a good introduction to his work at Studio La Città, which also has a list of his solo and group shows around the world since 2000 – and none have been in the UK. His pictures from Palermo were shown in Cardiff in 1998 and work from a war-torn Beirut at a private gallery in London the previous year, but seem not to have featured in any of our major London galleries. It’s a shame that we’ve never really had a major space in London devoted to photography – and in particular that the Photographers’ Gallery which gets so much of the photography funding that crumbs down from the opera-dominated Arts Coucil has failed to step up to the mark in this and many other areas of photography.

You can see more of his work online at the Amador Gallery (New York). Although best known for his black and white work, there is an interesting colour series, Roma, on the Galerie VU website, which presents a rather different view of the city. There is a fine collection of his work at the Galerie Anne Barrault, which includes one of my favourite of his images in the 1984 series bord de la mer.

Basilico trained as an architect and had his first important photographic show in and on Milan in 1983. The following year he was the only Italian of the 36 photographers commissioned by the French government for their major DATAR project to ph0tograph the natural and built environment of France. Among the other photographers involved were Lewis Baltz, Raymond Depardon and Robert Doisneau. (A full list is in the French Wikipedia article, and there is a history of the project, La France vue du sol, by Vincent Guigueno published in 2006 in études photographiques and available online – if your French is up to it.)

Several if not most of those photographers whose work is featured on the urban landscapes web site I run with Mike Seaborne were impressed and to some extent inspired by the work of Basilico, and by his success. We would have loved to have featured his work on that site, but never quite got around to contacting him, overawed by his reputation.