Final Reminder – East of the City

© 2011, Paul Baldesare
Columbia Market – Paul Baldesare

Tonight, Thurday 6 October at 6-8 pm at The Shoreditch Gallery is the opening of our show ‘East of the City‘ which if you can’t make it tonight continues in the gallery at ‘The Juggler’ until 29th Oct 2011. It’s a short walk from Old Street tube, just off Pitfield St, though I’ll take a bus.

My book ‘Before the Olympics‘ will be available at the opening – saving the excessive delivery costs normally involved. It has all12 of my pictures in the show, along with around 250 others, though not all from what is now the Olympic site.


Marshgate Lane, Stratford Marsh, 1990.

From the Lions Point Of View

Isn’t it a thrill to have him here in London” said the woman behind me to a friend as we we all waited, hardly an empty seat in the small lecture area of National Geographics’s Regent St first floor, and the next hour or so listening to Shahidul Alam talking, showing pictures and answering questions certainly justified her anticipation.

© 2011, Peter Marshall

Probably most of us in the audience had some idea of the incredible transformation Dr Alam has made to the world of photography, not just in his native Bangladesh but worldwide, although so much still remains to be done, but I think all of us found there was even more to him – and his family – than we had been previously aware.

Alam’s mother in particular was a formidable woman; determined to get a university education despite the opposition of her mother to the education of women, she left home every morning in a burkha “going to visit friends” and went to study. Armed with her degree she dedicated herself to the education of women, and having found little backing for her project, bought a tent and used it to set up her own school for girls.

Later too we heard that his father had dared to evade the “invitation” sent to him along with the other leading intellectuals of the country to take tea with the occupying Pakistani generals in 1971 just a few days before the end of the war. It was a story accompanied by a picture by Rashid Talukdar of a severed head in rubble, from the killing fields of Rayerbazar. Altogether more than a thousand teachers, journalists, doctors, lawyers, artists, writers and engineers were massacred.

Shahidul Alam was sent to study chemistry in the UK in 1972, gaining his Ph.D in London, and taught the subject while at the same time developing an interest in photography, at first making camera club style pretty pictures. But then he came across photographs that were harder to understand and seemed to have more depth – such as Steichen’s ‘Heavy Roses’, said to be the last picture he took in France in 1914, sumptuous but slowly decaying and fading as the Great War started – and began learning to see and to work at finding out what was interesting about such less obvious pictures. While living in Kingsbury in Northwest London he photographed people in his locality and took them to the local paper, who published them as a spread on the back page and paid him a tenner for them (a local paper paying – how times change!) – his first professional work.

He had (and still has)  a particular love of photographing children, and having seen that a child portraiture studio – Young Rascals Studio in Acton – wanted photographers he went for an interview and got the job, and was soon the most successful of their photographers, earning around £350 a week, a pretty good wage at the time.

After a while, although he was doing well financially he decided that what he was doing was not something he wanted to devote his life to, and he made up his mind to return to Dhaka with his savings of £2800, and go back and live with his parents and try and become a photographer and take part in the life of his own country . It wasn’t easy to find any employment there, so he set up his own business as a photographer as well as starting to teach photography and work with communities.

Alam was at pains to point out that he had no problem with white western  photographers coming to photograph in his country, but that he felt that photographers from countries in the majority world had an understanding of their own communities that provided them with a different viewpoint. He wanted a pluralistic world in which different people got to tell stories, but was against the kind of monopolistic view that media around the world tended to project of countries like his own. This was brought home strongly to him while on a visit to Northern Ireland when a five-year-old showed her surprise at seeing him playing with a few coins. Even at that age she knew that people from Bangladesh didn’t have any money.

Increasingly too he began to question his own position in his own society, as a middle class man with a camera – and characteristically began to do something practical about it. In 1994 he set up a women’s’ photography group, bringing a woman to the country to teach them, and he also began teaching photography to classes of working class children.  He then set up the Pathshala school of Photography, now recognised as a world-leading school for photojournalism, with its students and ex-students gaining exceptional success in international competitions. It is also possibly unique in that all of those finishing the course have found work as photographers, though Alam did say that the market for photographers in Bangladesh was now becoming saturated and he was having to think about encouraging some students to work in ancillary professions such as picture editing and picture research.

It was great to see in his photographs and a short film clip how photography was being taken to the people in Bangladesh, with mobile exhibitions mounted on bullock carts and cycle carts being taken into villages, and also the work with village children. Alam also founded and directs the Chobi Mela international festival of photography held in Dhaka every two years which he set up is the largest photography festival in Asia and takes photography out on the streets (and on a boat) with a very different atmosphere to most festivals.

Through his photographic agency Drik, (now part of a wider multimedia organisation) set up in 1989, Alam has worked hard to change the way that rich world publications deal with events in Bangladesh and the majority world generally, although not always yet with great success. From 1983 the political events in his country turned him to documenting the political movement against the military rule of General Ershad which lasted, with minor changes until 1991. During the later years of that period there was increasing disorder and a ban on reporting pro-democracy activities – which newspapers responded to by ceasing publication. During this time Alam kept sending out pictures of the political events to news organisations around the world – who ignored them , as to them it wasn’t news. The only time the world press took any interest in Bangladesh was at times of natural disasters  – cyclones and floods. (Presumably, though he didn’t say so, this became news because of the pressure from the major aid agencies, who avoid involvement in ‘political’ issues.)

Alam’s talk was entitled ‘When the lions find their storytellers‘, from the widespread African proverb “Until the lion has his own storyteller, the hunter will always have the best side of the story.” Whoever does not have a voice is almost always going to be the loser. His life’s work has been trying to tell the lions’ story and to teach the lions so they can tell their own story.

Drik Picture Agency has played an important part in this, and more recently has set up ‘Majority World‘, a platform set up to allow “indigenous photographers, photographic agencies and image collections from the majority world to gain fair access to global image markets” and to present image buyers with “the the wealth of fresh imagery and photographic talent emerging from the Majority World.”

© 2011, Peter Marshall

He ended his talk with a little about two of his heroes, and the final image was what is now perhaps his best-known photograph, possibly the last official portrait of Nelson Mandela. As always, Alam had a story to tell, of how he was held up travelling from Mexico to take it and thought he had missed his chance to take the picture, but hearing about his transport problem, Mandela actually rescheduled the sitting for two days later. The picture seemed to be a suitable backdrop against which to take his picture and I got out my Fuji X100 and took a few frames from my third row seat, some of which needed rather drastic cropping.

© 2011, Peter Marshall

Questions at the end of the talk brought out some other vast aspects of his work that he had not included, including the work he and his fellow photographers have undertaken over the years on the vast environmental problems of his country, much of which is likely to disappear as global warming leads to sea level rise.

One questioner brought up the problem of the relationship between documentary and art photography, and of how Alam has managed to work so effectively across both spheres. It was during his answer that he removed the pair of ordinary inexpensive sandals he was as always wearing and held them up into the light, saying put them in a gallery with the right display and lighting and they would sell as a work of art for thirty or forty thousand pounds (I did think he might have to change his name to Tracey Emin as well) before putting them back on his feet and saying these are now just sandals again. It was only a part of his response, but like much of his talk, one that promoted thought. He also talked about the Crossfire project on extra-judicial killings in Bangladesh which rather than attempting to look at these by documentary photographs of events he made large format colour images of the places where the killings had taken place, exhibiting them together with the facts about the events in what he called “A quiet metaphor for the screaming truth” – and which was closed and barricaded by armed police – but as I also mentioned here was opened in the road outside the gallery.

It was a talk that was full of hope and inspiration, but one that also left me with something of a feeling of despair for the situation of photography in my own country. In Bangladesh things seem much starker and the struggles and possibilities more obvious. Here photography often seems strangled, choked by the money and prejudices of the art world, distorted by academia. We’ve seen the abandonment of our major documentary resource, Side Gallery, by the Arts Council and the continued side-lining of our most democratic photography festival, the East London Photomonth, by the photographic establishment.

Shahidul Alam’s first solo retrospective in the UK,  ‘My Journey as Witness‘ opens at Tristan Hoare’s gallery in the Wilmotte Gallery at Lichfield Studios, 133 Oxford Gardens, London W10 6NE on 6th October, and runs until 18 November 2011, with a  book of the same title being launched the in the UK on October 10 by Skira, Milan. Copies are actually already on sale and I took a short look at it at the National Geographic Store. It is certainly a tribute to Alam that the first volume in what Skira intend to be a multi-volume series on the arts of Bangladesh is devoted to him and to photography. The book has an introduction by Sebastião Salgado and preface by Raghu Rai.

Also here on >Re:PHOTO you can read about two earlier exhibitions curated by Alam, in  ‘Bangladesh 1971‘ at Autograph and ‘Where Three Dreams Cross’ at the Whitechapel Gallery in 2010. Writing about World Photography Day earlier this year (a piece prompted by a post on Shahidul News) I concluded:

Photography may have started in France (and England) and perhaps came of age in the twentieth century in Europe and the USA. But now much of the more interesting work is happening elsewhere.

It seems a good way to end this over-long piece too.

Speculation on Photographs (Part 2)

This is a continuation of Speculation on Photographs which includes a discussion of Erroll Morris’s exhaustive examination of the two Roger Fenton images from ‘The Valley of the Shadow of Death’, one with cannonballs on the path and the other without.

Morris seems to me to be unduly concerned with reality and with establishing a connection between photograph and reality. To him it really was important whether those cannonballs were where they landed, while to me it seemed unlikely in view of both momentum and gravity. (I wroteYou might also ask why so many balls should have stopped rolling on the smoother road rather than going down into the gully by its side, especially if you’ve ever played bagatelle.”)

Fenton was of course working before there were any well-established conventions about what was ethical in news photography (which he was more or less inventing), let along in art, and there can be no doubt that he saw himself as an artist, and that he was someone who carefully composed his pictures.  I imagine that he took one picture as soon as he arrived, unsure about whether it would be safe to stay long enough to make a second exposure, then set about getting things arranged in a more artistic fashion.

Soth goes on to show an example from his series Broken Manual which is a kind of re-creation of Robert Frank’s image through a curtained window in Butte Montana, though in various respects a very different picture. Without the reference to Frank’s earlier image it would I feel have very little interest, and I would certainly wonder why the photographer took it. He does give some answers to that question in the link he provides to How to Revisit an Iconic Photograph which includes some other of his re-creations of well-known images. Soth says that he learnt a lot from re-visiting these pictures, which I’m sure is true, but I feel that I gain much from looking at the re-results of his learning experience.

Another image he has used as a starting point and is illustrated in the article is Dorothea Lange’s ‘Migrant Mother’, and he raises an interesting point when he mentions that her “are dramatically out of focus.” It’s worth downloading the digital file LC-DIG-fsa-8b29516 made from the original negative from the Library of Congress to examine this claim (the link to the larger 55Mb file fails for me) which is used for the image below, displayed here to a smaller size – right click and select ‘ View image’ to see it larger. Unlike some of the other images on the LoC site, including some versions of this image, it does not appear to have been ruined by excessive sharpening* of the digital file (which doubtless seemed a good idea given the different standards of the 1990s), and apart from a difference in tonality is a good match for the vintage print reproduced there.

LC-DIG-fsa-8b29516 Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection
Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection. Public Domain

The image above is an actual 821×1024 pixel file, and I’m looking at it on my screen at actual size as I write, where it displays at roughly 8 x 10 inches (a twice linear magnification from the original 4 x 5 negative, made by Lange on her Graflex RB Series D. Working with this format and probably with the camera hand-held, depth of field would have been pretty minimal as a fairly wide aperture such as f5.6 or f8 would have been used to avoid camera shake. Film was slow in modern terms, and generously exposed negatives were desired.

Critical sharpness occurs more or less on the ear and check shirt of Florence Owens Thompson, and I suspect as Lange peered down into the reflex viewfinder that the squares coming sharply into focus caught her attention. The eyes are certainly not as sharp, but sharp by the standards of the day which were much less rigorous than ours.

Way back in the 1970s I happened to be around when a very distinguished ex-President of the Royal Photographic Society was setting up a panel of his work for a workshop about gaining the awards of that body, and made the mistake of commenting that the pictures on it  – prints around 20 x 16″ were unsharp – as they clearly were. He overheard my comment and I got very firmly told that I didn’t know what I was talking about, his pictures were sharp enough. By his standards they were, but not by our more modern expectations – and things have got worse now we are used to zooming in to the actual pixels on screen.

Soth is of course correct to say that the eyes are “dramatically out of focus” in that their slight unsharpness actually increases the dramatic effect of the image, although for me it is perhaps the blurring of the wrinkles on her forehead that is more telling. There is a contrast between the biting sharpness of the hair of the child at the right of the image and the softness of the woman’s face as she stares into an unknown but apparently hopeless future.

For me the most successful of Soth’s re-creations is clearly based on Ruth Orkin’s ‘An American Girl in Italy’. As he clearly says, what gives his picture and the original their “energy is that a real event took place.” Though I still think Orkin’s image works so much better that I would hesitate in showing the new work if it were mine.


*With scans, standards of sharpness and tonality have also changed considerably but differently over a shorter period, as scanner technology has improved. The Library of Congress (and on a much smaller scale myself) suffers from having been one of the pioneers of putting photographic images onto the web. Many of those old scans now look more like caricatures rather than reproductions of the images the represent, with drastic white fringing and obvious jpeg artifacts.

Northern Outfall Sewer 1990, 2005, 2010…

Saturday afternoon I made another trip to the Northern Outfall Sewer (aka Greenway) on Stratford Marsh, a site I’ve been to many times over the years since my first visit around 1982. But this time I wasn’t just going to take photographs as I have done over the years, but to talk about my work, along with four other photographers, and to take part in a discussion with them and the twenty or so others present in one of the sessions of the ‘Salon de Refuse Olympique’ (I think seriously missing an acute accent on the third word of the title) which was described as “An Olympian marathon of salon debates for forthcoming book documenting and highlighting critical creative responses to the official London 2012 Olympic Games site and Cultural Olympiad.”

Our session, held in the View Tube,  entitled ‘Imagining the Olympics‘ was led by Dr Ben Campkin, Director of UCL Urban Lab and assistant director of Architectural Research at the Bartlett School of Architecture and the other photographers on the panel were Chris Dorley-Brown, Alessandra Chila, David George and Giles Price. Gesche Wuerfel also down to take part was out of the country but had sent some thoughts.

I don’t know how it will emerge in the forthcoming book, but for the event each of us was asked to send 3 photographs and to use these to talk about our work.  So here are the three pictures I sent and below them the text that I wrote and used as a guide to my presentation.

© 1990, Peter Marshall
London Olympic site 1990
© 2005 Peter Marshall
London Olympic site 2005
© 2010, Peter Marshall
London Olympic site 2010

 Before The Olympics – The Lea Valley 1981-2010 and Beyond?

Two of these pictures are in my book ‘Before the Olympics – the Lea Valley 1981-2010’ and the third taken shortly after I put that book together. A dozen of my pictures of the Olympic site in the 1980s including the first of these three are now in a show that opened this morning at the Shoreditch Gallery in Hoxton Market, part of the East London Photomonth.

I made that 1990, the next 2005 and the last 2010. All made more or less where we are now, a place where I’ve taken quite a few photographs over the years. Much of the work from the area is on my Lea Valley web site, which gets around 250 views a day, a rather small fraction of the 3.25 million a year for all of my work, but the active time on the site for the average visitor of almost a minute is high in web terms.  I showed over 250 pictures from the site in a presentation at the 2010 London Documentary Film Festival after which I was asked ‘Do you have a book’ and thought to myself ‘Why not?, and a couple of weeks later I did – and Blurb made it an editor’s pick and got me to talk about it at their week of presentations in London last November.

I began photographing London in the early 1970s, but only began work seriously in the 80s, having produced and exhibited a major project on Hull, where I’d found a way to approach the city. I’d also worked in Paris, where ten years earlier I’d come across and been inspired by the work of Eugene Atget. Other influences included topographic works such as the encyclopaedic ‘Face of London’ by Harold Clunn and of course Pevsner’s ‘The Buildings of England’ series, though this was in some ways a perverse stimulus in that I was often more excited by what he left out than what he put in.

Back then, few people were in any real sense attempting to photograph London as a city, and the scale was daunting. There were no digital cameras, no GPS, no geo-tagging, no personal computers, no Internet. I started with the A-Z of London, which fortunately after a few years changed from its own system to use the National Grid. At the base of my project was the idea of building up a corpus of work that would include what I felt to be significant buildings and scenes to represent every kilometre square of Greater London (though of course some were much more productive than others.) It remains an unfinished project, partly because of the scale (there are probably around 2000 such squares in my slightly elastic definition of London) but largely because it has been overtaken by the Internet and the explosion of photography in the digital era.

But this work, some of which was bought for the National Building Record and some put on my first major web site on my own domain in 1996 – it was called  (in a nod to Pevsner) ‘buildingsoflondon.co.uk’. I saw the work as a resource and a jumping-off point for other projects, some related to geography and transport – including projects on the Northern Outfall sewer, below us, the Lea Navigation and other rivers, and, not far away, the Greenwich Meridian, but others which were more a cultural exploration, such as ‘Ideal Café, Cool Blondes and Paradise’. Another major theme was the de-industrialisation of London, reflected in part in my ‘London’s Industrial Heritage’ site. The first portfolio I put together on the Lea was part of an unsuccessful application for Arts Council support around 1983, but many photographers who saw it were very encouraging, including one now very influential in the photography world who advised me to give up the day job – teaching – and go full time.

More recently I’ve returned to photographing the people of London, on the streets, in festivals and particularly in protests, and have become better known for a site called ‘My London Diary’. This work brought me back to the Olympic site, both to cover the protests against the Olympic bid and also the unsuccessful efforts by the Manor Gardens allotment holders to be a part of what might have been a truly green Olympics.


Of course these three are not the only pictures that I took over the years from more or less the same spot – and had I had the time I could have matched them more closely from my files. On the way to the discussion I went and made several more panoramas, including one from the same viewpoint. And on Sunday I was back on Fish Island and Hackney Wick taking a few more images of the Olympic site, some of which I’ll share in a later post – and of course in My London Diary.

Photomonth Opens – Phil Maxwell

© 2011, Peter Marshall
Phil Maxwell speaks at the opening

Tonight saw the opening of Photomonth 2011, still London’s only real major photography festival, although nominally limited to East London. That is a fairly elastic definition, and there are also a few shows outside the area, as well as some on-line.

There had been a suggestion that there might be a greater emphasis this year in the run up to the London Olympics on photographs of East London in general and the Olympic area in particular, which was why I organised the show ‘East of the City‘ as a part of it, with work by three photographers and including some of my own pictures from what is now the Olympic area, taken around 25-30 years ago.

Looking through the very extensive catalogue of exhibitions this year – well over a hundred shows in East London, as well as other activities, relatively few seem to have taken that suggestion to heart, but at the very centre of the festival, showing the the Bishopsgate Institute and Rough Trade East is Phil Maxwell’s ‘Forty Years On’, and it was this show that was the centrepiece of this years Photomonth opening.

I found it a slightly difficult show to view in the library at the Bishopsgate Institute, with some pictures high up on the wall above the book cases, and others rather smaller on the ends of the stacks. I was thankful that their was a listing of the images so I could work my way slowly around the space and make sure I saw them all, though I did find it a little annoying to have to change from my distance spectacles for those pictures on high and back to my ‘computer’ glasses for those at a lower level. Maxwell’s earlier work from Liverpool in the 1970s was rather easier to view, shown more conventionally in the corridor outside the library, and perhaps because of this and a more limited range of subject matter I found it photographically more coherent.

From Liverpool, Maxwell came down to London, and his pictures show that he took the East End to his heart, and the reception at the opening showed that the people there took him to theirs.

Here are some pictures from the opening on Thursday 29th – in time I will post more on the 2011 September pages of My London Diary.

© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall
Festival Director Maggie Pinhorn introduces Phil Maxwell
© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall

© 2011, Peter Marshall

Over the next month there are many events and shows to enjoy in London  – see the details on the web site or pick up the brochure from any of the hundred or more venues.

Shahidul Alam in London

When I began to write about ‘World Photography‘ eleven or so years ago, one man in particular earned my respect for his work in setting up the agency Drik and in general promoting photography from the majority world.

I’ve mentioned Dr Shahidul Alam quite a few times on this site, and next week those in London can hear him give a free public talk When the lions find their storytellers at the National Geographic Store, 83-97 Regent Street on October 4th at 6pm.

Later in the week, his first solo retrospective in the UK, ‘My Journey as Witness‘ opens at Tristan Hoare’s gallery in the Wilmotte Gallery at Lichfield Studios, 133 Oxford Gardens, London W10 6NE on 6th October, and runs until 18 November 2011, with a book of the same title being launched the in the UK on October 10 by Skira, Milan.

Secret Gardens Opening Pictures

One event I decided not to photograph was the opening of my ‘Secret Gardens of St John’s Wood‘  show last week. Although I had taken a camera along with me and was wearing it around my neck I didn’t take a single picture. So I was pleased to see Paul Baldesare taking some pictures at the event – and he handed the camera over to Jiro Osuga at one point.

I didn’t want to take pictures because I was too busy and perhaps too involved to work sensibly; it was really nothing to do with having drunk several glasses of red wine, very necessary to keep my voice working with all the talking I was doing!

© 2011, Paul Baldesare

This is a nice picture of Dr Cathy Ross opening the show, with a couple of photographers in the background.  Like the other pictures in this post it was taken with a Panasonic DMC-GF2 with a 14mm lens at ISO 640. Although the quality seems fine, it does point out a big difference between the 4/3 format and cameras such as the Nikon D700 where I would have happily been working at ISO 3200, more than 2 stops faster, or even faster, and working without flash, or if I’d brought the SB800 as well, adding a bit of bounce flash.  Of course there is a balance and the DMC-GF2 is a lot less to carry and perhaps easier to use than a D700 + SB800 combination  – and a lot cheaper. In favour of the larger combination are quality and flexibility.

© 2011, Paul Baldesare

Several of the garden owners are in the next picture, along with a few of the others present. But the 14mm in a fairly small space only shows a fairly small section of those present, with its 28mm equivalent field of view. Its the kind of situation where something wider – like the 16-35 mm on the D700 or the 10-20mm on the Nikon D300 (or perhaps better still the Nikon 10.5mm full-frame fisheye) come into their own.

© 2011, Paul Baldesare

The smaller format also I think shows its limitations in this image, where it hasn’t coped too well with the dynamic range. But I’m pleased to have these pictures of the event and Paul has done a good job in catching some of the  gestures and expressions of the people involved in the fairly short formal proceedings of the evening, particularly since I suspect he was ahead of me on the wine.  But they do I think show the limitations of the equipment, and confirm my decision for the moment not to invest in one of these more compact systems.

© 2011, Paul Baldesare

The final picture I’ll include is perhaps a good example of subject failure, if not in the classic sense of the term. I’m really rather better behind the camera than in front of it, seen here thanking Dr Ross for her speech.

But in the end the best camera is the one that was there – and was used by someone who knows how to use it – and my thanks to Paul for the pictures. You can see some better example of his work in our show together (along with Mike Seaborne, who appears in most of the pictures above) East of the City – which will be open to the public from Saturday.

East of the City – Invitation

You are welcome to the Private View 6-8pm Thursday 6 Oct 2011:East of the City

Oct 1-29 2011

 The Shoreditch Gallery • The Juggler • 5 Hoxton Market •
London N1 6HG

020 7729 7292 Gallery • 01784 456474 Other information

Mon-Fri 8am-6pm, Sat: 10am-4pm. Closed Sun • Free admission

(Hoxton Market is just east of Pitfield St, reached via Boot
St or Coronet St)

Documents from East London by three photographers

 

Paul Baldesare COLUMBIA MARKET

Mike Seaborne LONDON FACADES

Peter Marshall BEFORE THE OLYMPICS

 

Baldesare Seaborne Marshall

East of the City


East of the City is a part of Photomonth
2011
, the 11th annual East London Photography festival.

Prison Photography

I’ve mentioned a few times the web site Prison Photography written by Peter Brook who also is the lead blogger for Wired.com’s Raw File photography blog.

Another blog I read regularly is the New York Time’s Lens, and a couple of days ago they ran a piece ‘Focusing on Prison Photography‘ in which James Estrin interviews Brook about his work and interest in prison photography, with examples and links to the work of a number of photographers. It’s an article that touches on important issues and links to some interesting photography, mainly by photographers whose work I didn’t previously know.

One UK photographer who has taken an interest in prisons is Ed Clark, and some time ago I reviewed his book Still Life: Killing Time on this site. I’ve also written about his more recent work Guantanamo: If the Light Goes Out on the camp and those who were locked up there, although I don’t think the longer piece I wrote about this ever got published. And I never got around to putting it on this site as I was waiting for a promised review copy of the book that never arrived.