Photomonth Continues

The East London Photomonth is now in full swing, but some of the shows are fairly short lived and easy to miss. So the Photomonth Photolounge (4 Wilkes St) is only on until Sunday 16th October (I dropped in briefly to the opening on Tuesday.)  Some other shows have closed already, while others have only just opened and some don’t open until later. Although it is called a month it really spreads out over a couple of months.

You can find all the details on the Photomonth 2011 web site, though I do wish that it was rather easier to find which shows are open on any particular date. Of course with 104 venues it isn’t an easy job, but one a suitable database should be able to cope with. Or even a downloadable spreadsheet calendar file would be useful.

I don’t think the site has a list of the photographers taking part either, though you can search for them by opening the full listing and using the browser’s search facility.

I’ve seen very little about the festival either online or in print, but was very pleased to see a review on London24 by photographer Julio Etchart, not least because he had some nice things to say about my work on show as a part of East of the City along with pictures by Paul Baldesare and Mike Seaborne. (Incidentally changed circumstances mean that we have to take this show down on the afternoon of 28 October, slightly earlier than the advertised date.)

We have to wait until next month to see Etchart’s own contribution to Photomonth, on show at Open The Gate in Dalston next month, following the current Photomonth show there, Mother Africa by Pierre Vannoni.

Notting Hill

I went to Notting Hill last week, and it was for me a notable event in several ways. I don’t often go that way except for my annual trips to carnival at the end of August, but I was there for the opening of a show at a gallery I’ve not visited before, one of a series of shows jointly organised by Tristan Hoare and Jean-Michel Wilmotte in the Wilmotte Gallery, in the former garage which became Lichfield studios (at 133 Oxford Gardens, London W10 6NE) and has now been converted into offices and an exhibition space by architect, designer and urban planner Wilmotte.

I was attending Shahidul Alam‘s first solo retrospective in the UK, ‘My Journey as Witness‘ which runs until 18 November 2011. It was a memorable evening, although I was not able to stay as long as I would have liked, but was able to talk to both Alam and the Rosa Mario Falvo, the editor of his fine book, also called ‘My Journey as Witness.

I opened my copy this morning when I had a few minutes to spare while files were uploading and around an hour later I was still reading it. It is a work that is important not just for the photography but also for what it bears witness to about relationships between the majority world and the wealthy nations and and perhaps in particular about NGOs.

Back to lighter things, in August I was in Notting Hill and here are a few pictures to prove it:

© 2011 Peter Marshall

Someone yesterday told me they had never been to carnival and described it as a monocultural event. Which perhaps just proves they have never been there or at least not in the last 20 or so years.

© 2011 Peter Marshall

Part of its interest for me is in it being an event that very much now reflects the multicultural nature of London.

Plenty more (perhaps too many) pictures on My London Diary.

© 2011 Peter Marshall

I’ve posted the work as two sets of pictures, one taken on the Fuji X100 and the other on the Nikon D300 DSLR as I was interested in seeing if I worked differently with the two cameras. In general I don’t really think so.

© 2011 Peter Marshall

Dust

Dust is in various ways a problem for photographers. Back in the old darkroom days cleaning negatives well could save hours of work spotting your black and white prints, and if you had dust on the film in the camera it would give black spots that were even tricker to remove. Sometimes it was possible to bleach them out on the wet print, or you could physically remove them with a scalpel from the finished print, and both were pretty tricky.

Dust is a problem when scanning negatives and slides too, and glassless carriers which took away much of the problem in the darkroom don’t seem to be made as well for scanners as for the best enlargers.  You soon get into a routine of using a ‘Rocket’ or other powerful air blower on every surface before each scan. But the good thing about scanning is that it becomes relatively easy to retouch the scans and remove black and white spots as well as scratches etc.

Digital images, at least those from cameras with interchangeable lenses, tend to suffer from dust too.  I give the rear of all my lenses and the mirror chamber a good blast with the Rocket at least once a week before going out to take pictures, and then lock up the mirror to give the sensor the Rocket treatment.

Having replaced the lens I turn the camera off to bring the mirror down, then on again so I can finally use the camera’s built-in dust removal. It is perhaps more a ritual than effective cleaning, but it does appear to keep problems at a minimum.

Even so, there does tend to be a build-up of dirt on the sensor, although it fortunately is seldom very noticeable in the images. It usually only shows up badly in even areas such as skies, and Lightroom or other software has the tools to make short work of it.

Dust did seem to be much more of a problem with earlier DSLRs. I remember having to swab off my sensor perhaps monthly with the D100 and D70, while I can’t remember ever having done it with the D700.

But what brings dust to my mind today is not cameras but computers. I switched my main machine on late on Tuesday, but it wouldn’t start. Today the computer engineer told me that dust had been the problem, as he took the box away for a motherboard replacement and general sprucing up.

It is around five years old, so time for something new, and I already have a high-spec replacement machine on order, intending to keep this as a backup. But it is a very considerable inconvenience having to re-install software and after I get the new sytems I’ll have days of work to get back to normal running.   Fortunately most of my important files are backed up, and I hope I will lose very little.

I could have saved much of this by regular dust removal from inside my computer, opening the case and carefully cleaning out the dust from it. The large fan over the processor had become clogged up with dust, though it was still spinning around it was no longer doing it’s job at cooling the processor.

One of the things that I’m currently without is my diary, but once I get computers back to normal, one thing I’ll be sure to add – and with an annoying reminder to make sure I notice it – is a task that recurs every six months, to dust my computer.

I’m typing this on a notebook computer with little or no dust problem so far as I’m aware, though a slightly cramped and unresposive keyboard. I’d hoped to get back to more regular posting this week both here and on My London Diary after a very busy time over the past few months, but my dust problems have put paid to that for the moment.

Closer To Ideal?

Eleven years ago in another place, I wrote an article ‘Digital Wishes‘ when I looked forward to what the camera of the future might be. I wanted something that was small, light, responsive and flexible (and with a decently extreme wide-angle) and had a few suggestions, including:

For a digital camera system, the obvious first step is to remove the mirror and pentaprism, replacing them by a digital viewfinder system,”

It was certainly the most contentious article I’ve ever written, and e-mail after e-mail came in and there were long and at times rather bitter arguments on an online forum I belonged to, with many posters telling me exactly why the laws of physics said that some of the things that I suggested just were not possible.

Most of them have I think been implemented now, though sometimes a little differently from how I envisaged them, and there are many more features I hadn’t thought of (or didn’t and still don’t want) in some of the newer cameras, but I’m still waiting for my perfect camera, or even one good enough to tempt me away from the heavy DSLR outfit that has been weighing down my left shoulder for years. (I had to give up on my right side thirty years back.)

Looking at the ‘first impressions’ on the web of the Sony NEX-7 announced in August it looks as if we may have the first truly usable digital viewfinder (it’s also in another Sony) for still cameras (although some others such as the Fuji X100 are close.) And although the NEX-7 seems slightly ugly it does appear to manage to get an awful lot in a rather diminutive body.

I’m not a great fan of Sony, but they do seem to have tried in the NEX-7 to produce a camera that has taken a new look at what photographers want and tried to provide it rather than produce cameras that look very much like classics but don’t really provide the features we want (and I include the Fuji FX100 in this, much as I like it.)

It’s a shame that Nikon seem to have put so much effort into a new format camera that can’t quite give the quality we need and that Fuji’s second attempt suffers from an even worse small format problem. If it really performs as well as the early views suggest, the NEX-7 might just mean we can take some strain off our shoulders, though there are one or two disappointing aspects.

One for me is the over-large file size at 24Mp, and another is the lack so far of any real wide-angle. The widest lens is a 16mm (24 mm equiv) and there are 0.75 and fisheye converters but although I’ve seen sample pictures on a Japanese site I’ve so far found no really detailed reviews, though this user review by ‘TRA’ on Amazon is encouraging.  But what I’d really like is a good zoom that gets down to perhaps 11 or 12mm at the wide end, rather than having to fiddle adding a converter for the wide pictures. I could live with having to do this for a fisheye, as that’s a little more specialised.

There are really very few occasions when I’ve felt any need for more than the 12 megapixels that my current cameras provide, though I have used some very much large files. Doubling the number of sites on a chip is unlikely to provide any real advantage and is likely to result in higher noise levels as well as larger files. I’ve a 40×30″ print from a 12Mp file (corrected somewhat from a fisheye view and actually probably only using rather less than 9 of those 12 Mp) in my ‘Secret Gardens’ show at the moment, and elsewhere there is a 2.3 metre wide image in a public exhibition which was made from a 6Mp image taken on a Nikon D100.

We are bound to read some glowing articles on the new Nikon 1 system shortly, with journalists from the major magazines being treated to trips out to Japan and lavish hospitality. Of course it won’t affect their objectivity:-)  Nor of course will Nikon’s huge advertising spend that they depend on to keep in business.  But the Nikon 1 has a sensor less than 1/3 of the area of the Sony, and that is just too big a hill to climb. So get ready with the salt for when the guys report from their expenses-paid trips. It used to sometimes annoy me when I wasn’t allowed to accept such offers when I wrote professionally, but I can see why we had a strict code of professional ethics.  It is perhaps surprising that such codes apparently don’t apply elsewhere.

The Nikon 1 will almost certainly be a good camera as compact cameras go – and probably more than a match for the recently announced Fuji X10, which has an even smaller sensor, about half the size of the Nikon 1. But it isn’t going to be batting in the same league as cameras like the NEX-7.

Which Clichés Have I Made Today?

Well, actually none yet, as I’m just about to rush out and take them, but I really love this rant by M.F. Agha published in 1937 in US Camera, the Hippocratic Oath of a Photographer, republished on the Monsters and Madonnas blog of the  International Center of Photography Library.

Of course it needs a little bringing up to date, though I think I’ve taken a few candid pictures of fat ladies, finding those Marlene Dietrich posters is a little tricky, though some – such as the Mexican child – are still rather too common.

But suggestions as to updates are welcome!

Opening Night

© 2011, Peter Marshall
Towards the end of the evening when most people had left it was truly an elite gathering

Magical. It was for me at any rate, though adrenaline and alcohol are always a heady mix. Although our opening last night at the Shoreditch Gallery/The Juggler was never particularly crowded, there was a steady stream of people coming to see the show and pay their respects before moving on to one of the many other openings. First Thursdays are often busy, but this one especially so, as it was also the first Thursday of the UK’s largest photo festival, the East London Photomonth.

I’d had several apologies from photographers who were out of the country – and had to send my own to several who were at their own openings elsewhere across London. But among those who came to the opening were a good cross-section of the better photographers of the capital, as well as other friends who we were also pleased to see.

Even after we’d left the gallery – well after the agreed closing time – and a small group of us were talking outside, another dozen people turned up to look at the work.

As well as the 12 pictures I had on show, I’d also taken along the book ‘Before The Olympics‘ (and some others) with another 250 or so pictures from the Lea Valley. As several people pointed out to me, the reproductions of the pictures on the wall in that volume were considerably less subtle and less rich than the prints on the wall. Although Blurb, especially using the more expensive premium paper, does a reasonable job, it can’t match either a good darkroom print or a good inkjet print.

The prints I had on the wall were all made using Epson Ultrachrome K3 inks on Ilford Gallerie Gold Fibre Silk, and it is a very good combination. I’ve experimented with printing from the R2400 using just the three black inks in the K3 set (photo (gloss) black, light black and light black) which you can do using the Bauhaus Rip (or presumably with the Quadtone Rip) and although the results are good in terms of tonality, the prints have a slightly unhealthy looking greenish black in daylight. The best results I’ve acheived with this ink/paper combination come from using Epson’s own ABW (advanced black and white) mode, which allows you to alter the print colour and uses a small amount of the colour inks along with the three blacks.

I’d printed the set using the same print colour settings, and under daylight they were a pretty good match, but in the gallery lighting there were some noticeable differences in tone. I suspect this comes from different light bulbs (or perhaps just different ageing of bulbs) used in the display lighting. Some had a slight magenta to the black which fellow exhibitor Mike Seaborne tells me is normal for the Epson inks under tungsten lighting, while others were if anything more neutral than in daylight. I didn’t find the differences a problem, although Mike prefers to use HP printers as he says their inks exhibit little or no metamerism.

Back in the 1980s I printed these pictures – and all my best work on Agfa papers, mainly Agfa Record Rapid, which had something of a cult status among photographers (and which the late Peter Goldfield set up a company, Goldfinger,  with premises above his Muswell Hill pharmacy to import) and occasionally the rather warmer Portriga Rapid. But Record Rapid (and its Portriga cousin) had to change its formulation to cut out the cadmium in the nineties, and the new version was simply not the same. I moved to using Ilford papers, which were fine, but no match. Probably the next prints that I was truly happy with were on matte papers such as Hahnemuhle German Etching and Photorag using Piezotone inks from Jon Cone. They weren’t Record Rapid but had a rather different quality of their own.  Now with newer semi-gloss papers – such as the Ilford Gold Fibre – I can get prints which, with the advantage of the precise control offered by working with scanned digital files, are usually even better than those from the old days. Though RR could have a depth and a pearly opalescence that was only ever surpassed in the very best (and rather rare) examples of carbon printing.

The night also brought home again one of the small design faults of the Fujifilm FX100, the rather light detent on the exposure compensation dial, which is also perhaps a little too conveniently placed at the back right corner of the top plate. With a fewer glasses of Merlot I would certainly have realised that I was working at +2 stops and avoided the overexposure that ruined most of the images. And +2 stops when working at full aperture makes for long shutter speeds, so pictures were blurred as well as overexposed. But I hadn’t gone there to take pictures and wasn’t giving it my usual attention, so there are rather fewer images in this post than I would have hoped.

Final Reminder – East of the City

© 2011, Paul Baldesare
Columbia Market – Paul Baldesare

Tonight, Thurday 6 October at 6-8 pm at The Shoreditch Gallery is the opening of our show ‘East of the City‘ which if you can’t make it tonight continues in the gallery at ‘The Juggler’ until 29th Oct 2011. It’s a short walk from Old Street tube, just off Pitfield St, though I’ll take a bus.

My book ‘Before the Olympics‘ will be available at the opening – saving the excessive delivery costs normally involved. It has all12 of my pictures in the show, along with around 250 others, though not all from what is now the Olympic site.


Marshgate Lane, Stratford Marsh, 1990.

From the Lions Point Of View

Isn’t it a thrill to have him here in London” said the woman behind me to a friend as we we all waited, hardly an empty seat in the small lecture area of National Geographics’s Regent St first floor, and the next hour or so listening to Shahidul Alam talking, showing pictures and answering questions certainly justified her anticipation.

© 2011, Peter Marshall

Probably most of us in the audience had some idea of the incredible transformation Dr Alam has made to the world of photography, not just in his native Bangladesh but worldwide, although so much still remains to be done, but I think all of us found there was even more to him – and his family – than we had been previously aware.

Alam’s mother in particular was a formidable woman; determined to get a university education despite the opposition of her mother to the education of women, she left home every morning in a burkha “going to visit friends” and went to study. Armed with her degree she dedicated herself to the education of women, and having found little backing for her project, bought a tent and used it to set up her own school for girls.

Later too we heard that his father had dared to evade the “invitation” sent to him along with the other leading intellectuals of the country to take tea with the occupying Pakistani generals in 1971 just a few days before the end of the war. It was a story accompanied by a picture by Rashid Talukdar of a severed head in rubble, from the killing fields of Rayerbazar. Altogether more than a thousand teachers, journalists, doctors, lawyers, artists, writers and engineers were massacred.

Shahidul Alam was sent to study chemistry in the UK in 1972, gaining his Ph.D in London, and taught the subject while at the same time developing an interest in photography, at first making camera club style pretty pictures. But then he came across photographs that were harder to understand and seemed to have more depth – such as Steichen’s ‘Heavy Roses’, said to be the last picture he took in France in 1914, sumptuous but slowly decaying and fading as the Great War started – and began learning to see and to work at finding out what was interesting about such less obvious pictures. While living in Kingsbury in Northwest London he photographed people in his locality and took them to the local paper, who published them as a spread on the back page and paid him a tenner for them (a local paper paying – how times change!) – his first professional work.

He had (and still has)  a particular love of photographing children, and having seen that a child portraiture studio – Young Rascals Studio in Acton – wanted photographers he went for an interview and got the job, and was soon the most successful of their photographers, earning around £350 a week, a pretty good wage at the time.

After a while, although he was doing well financially he decided that what he was doing was not something he wanted to devote his life to, and he made up his mind to return to Dhaka with his savings of £2800, and go back and live with his parents and try and become a photographer and take part in the life of his own country . It wasn’t easy to find any employment there, so he set up his own business as a photographer as well as starting to teach photography and work with communities.

Alam was at pains to point out that he had no problem with white western  photographers coming to photograph in his country, but that he felt that photographers from countries in the majority world had an understanding of their own communities that provided them with a different viewpoint. He wanted a pluralistic world in which different people got to tell stories, but was against the kind of monopolistic view that media around the world tended to project of countries like his own. This was brought home strongly to him while on a visit to Northern Ireland when a five-year-old showed her surprise at seeing him playing with a few coins. Even at that age she knew that people from Bangladesh didn’t have any money.

Increasingly too he began to question his own position in his own society, as a middle class man with a camera – and characteristically began to do something practical about it. In 1994 he set up a women’s’ photography group, bringing a woman to the country to teach them, and he also began teaching photography to classes of working class children.  He then set up the Pathshala school of Photography, now recognised as a world-leading school for photojournalism, with its students and ex-students gaining exceptional success in international competitions. It is also possibly unique in that all of those finishing the course have found work as photographers, though Alam did say that the market for photographers in Bangladesh was now becoming saturated and he was having to think about encouraging some students to work in ancillary professions such as picture editing and picture research.

It was great to see in his photographs and a short film clip how photography was being taken to the people in Bangladesh, with mobile exhibitions mounted on bullock carts and cycle carts being taken into villages, and also the work with village children. Alam also founded and directs the Chobi Mela international festival of photography held in Dhaka every two years which he set up is the largest photography festival in Asia and takes photography out on the streets (and on a boat) with a very different atmosphere to most festivals.

Through his photographic agency Drik, (now part of a wider multimedia organisation) set up in 1989, Alam has worked hard to change the way that rich world publications deal with events in Bangladesh and the majority world generally, although not always yet with great success. From 1983 the political events in his country turned him to documenting the political movement against the military rule of General Ershad which lasted, with minor changes until 1991. During the later years of that period there was increasing disorder and a ban on reporting pro-democracy activities – which newspapers responded to by ceasing publication. During this time Alam kept sending out pictures of the political events to news organisations around the world – who ignored them , as to them it wasn’t news. The only time the world press took any interest in Bangladesh was at times of natural disasters  – cyclones and floods. (Presumably, though he didn’t say so, this became news because of the pressure from the major aid agencies, who avoid involvement in ‘political’ issues.)

Alam’s talk was entitled ‘When the lions find their storytellers‘, from the widespread African proverb “Until the lion has his own storyteller, the hunter will always have the best side of the story.” Whoever does not have a voice is almost always going to be the loser. His life’s work has been trying to tell the lions’ story and to teach the lions so they can tell their own story.

Drik Picture Agency has played an important part in this, and more recently has set up ‘Majority World‘, a platform set up to allow “indigenous photographers, photographic agencies and image collections from the majority world to gain fair access to global image markets” and to present image buyers with “the the wealth of fresh imagery and photographic talent emerging from the Majority World.”

© 2011, Peter Marshall

He ended his talk with a little about two of his heroes, and the final image was what is now perhaps his best-known photograph, possibly the last official portrait of Nelson Mandela. As always, Alam had a story to tell, of how he was held up travelling from Mexico to take it and thought he had missed his chance to take the picture, but hearing about his transport problem, Mandela actually rescheduled the sitting for two days later. The picture seemed to be a suitable backdrop against which to take his picture and I got out my Fuji X100 and took a few frames from my third row seat, some of which needed rather drastic cropping.

© 2011, Peter Marshall

Questions at the end of the talk brought out some other vast aspects of his work that he had not included, including the work he and his fellow photographers have undertaken over the years on the vast environmental problems of his country, much of which is likely to disappear as global warming leads to sea level rise.

One questioner brought up the problem of the relationship between documentary and art photography, and of how Alam has managed to work so effectively across both spheres. It was during his answer that he removed the pair of ordinary inexpensive sandals he was as always wearing and held them up into the light, saying put them in a gallery with the right display and lighting and they would sell as a work of art for thirty or forty thousand pounds (I did think he might have to change his name to Tracey Emin as well) before putting them back on his feet and saying these are now just sandals again. It was only a part of his response, but like much of his talk, one that promoted thought. He also talked about the Crossfire project on extra-judicial killings in Bangladesh which rather than attempting to look at these by documentary photographs of events he made large format colour images of the places where the killings had taken place, exhibiting them together with the facts about the events in what he called “A quiet metaphor for the screaming truth” – and which was closed and barricaded by armed police – but as I also mentioned here was opened in the road outside the gallery.

It was a talk that was full of hope and inspiration, but one that also left me with something of a feeling of despair for the situation of photography in my own country. In Bangladesh things seem much starker and the struggles and possibilities more obvious. Here photography often seems strangled, choked by the money and prejudices of the art world, distorted by academia. We’ve seen the abandonment of our major documentary resource, Side Gallery, by the Arts Council and the continued side-lining of our most democratic photography festival, the East London Photomonth, by the photographic establishment.

Shahidul Alam’s first solo retrospective in the UK,  ‘My Journey as Witness‘ opens at Tristan Hoare’s gallery in the Wilmotte Gallery at Lichfield Studios, 133 Oxford Gardens, London W10 6NE on 6th October, and runs until 18 November 2011, with a  book of the same title being launched the in the UK on October 10 by Skira, Milan. Copies are actually already on sale and I took a short look at it at the National Geographic Store. It is certainly a tribute to Alam that the first volume in what Skira intend to be a multi-volume series on the arts of Bangladesh is devoted to him and to photography. The book has an introduction by Sebastião Salgado and preface by Raghu Rai.

Also here on >Re:PHOTO you can read about two earlier exhibitions curated by Alam, in  ‘Bangladesh 1971‘ at Autograph and ‘Where Three Dreams Cross’ at the Whitechapel Gallery in 2010. Writing about World Photography Day earlier this year (a piece prompted by a post on Shahidul News) I concluded:

Photography may have started in France (and England) and perhaps came of age in the twentieth century in Europe and the USA. But now much of the more interesting work is happening elsewhere.

It seems a good way to end this over-long piece too.

Speculation on Photographs (Part 2)

This is a continuation of Speculation on Photographs which includes a discussion of Erroll Morris’s exhaustive examination of the two Roger Fenton images from ‘The Valley of the Shadow of Death’, one with cannonballs on the path and the other without.

Morris seems to me to be unduly concerned with reality and with establishing a connection between photograph and reality. To him it really was important whether those cannonballs were where they landed, while to me it seemed unlikely in view of both momentum and gravity. (I wroteYou might also ask why so many balls should have stopped rolling on the smoother road rather than going down into the gully by its side, especially if you’ve ever played bagatelle.”)

Fenton was of course working before there were any well-established conventions about what was ethical in news photography (which he was more or less inventing), let along in art, and there can be no doubt that he saw himself as an artist, and that he was someone who carefully composed his pictures.  I imagine that he took one picture as soon as he arrived, unsure about whether it would be safe to stay long enough to make a second exposure, then set about getting things arranged in a more artistic fashion.

Soth goes on to show an example from his series Broken Manual which is a kind of re-creation of Robert Frank’s image through a curtained window in Butte Montana, though in various respects a very different picture. Without the reference to Frank’s earlier image it would I feel have very little interest, and I would certainly wonder why the photographer took it. He does give some answers to that question in the link he provides to How to Revisit an Iconic Photograph which includes some other of his re-creations of well-known images. Soth says that he learnt a lot from re-visiting these pictures, which I’m sure is true, but I feel that I gain much from looking at the re-results of his learning experience.

Another image he has used as a starting point and is illustrated in the article is Dorothea Lange’s ‘Migrant Mother’, and he raises an interesting point when he mentions that her “are dramatically out of focus.” It’s worth downloading the digital file LC-DIG-fsa-8b29516 made from the original negative from the Library of Congress to examine this claim (the link to the larger 55Mb file fails for me) which is used for the image below, displayed here to a smaller size – right click and select ‘ View image’ to see it larger. Unlike some of the other images on the LoC site, including some versions of this image, it does not appear to have been ruined by excessive sharpening* of the digital file (which doubtless seemed a good idea given the different standards of the 1990s), and apart from a difference in tonality is a good match for the vintage print reproduced there.

LC-DIG-fsa-8b29516 Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection
Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA/OWI Collection. Public Domain

The image above is an actual 821×1024 pixel file, and I’m looking at it on my screen at actual size as I write, where it displays at roughly 8 x 10 inches (a twice linear magnification from the original 4 x 5 negative, made by Lange on her Graflex RB Series D. Working with this format and probably with the camera hand-held, depth of field would have been pretty minimal as a fairly wide aperture such as f5.6 or f8 would have been used to avoid camera shake. Film was slow in modern terms, and generously exposed negatives were desired.

Critical sharpness occurs more or less on the ear and check shirt of Florence Owens Thompson, and I suspect as Lange peered down into the reflex viewfinder that the squares coming sharply into focus caught her attention. The eyes are certainly not as sharp, but sharp by the standards of the day which were much less rigorous than ours.

Way back in the 1970s I happened to be around when a very distinguished ex-President of the Royal Photographic Society was setting up a panel of his work for a workshop about gaining the awards of that body, and made the mistake of commenting that the pictures on it  – prints around 20 x 16″ were unsharp – as they clearly were. He overheard my comment and I got very firmly told that I didn’t know what I was talking about, his pictures were sharp enough. By his standards they were, but not by our more modern expectations – and things have got worse now we are used to zooming in to the actual pixels on screen.

Soth is of course correct to say that the eyes are “dramatically out of focus” in that their slight unsharpness actually increases the dramatic effect of the image, although for me it is perhaps the blurring of the wrinkles on her forehead that is more telling. There is a contrast between the biting sharpness of the hair of the child at the right of the image and the softness of the woman’s face as she stares into an unknown but apparently hopeless future.

For me the most successful of Soth’s re-creations is clearly based on Ruth Orkin’s ‘An American Girl in Italy’. As he clearly says, what gives his picture and the original their “energy is that a real event took place.” Though I still think Orkin’s image works so much better that I would hesitate in showing the new work if it were mine.


*With scans, standards of sharpness and tonality have also changed considerably but differently over a shorter period, as scanner technology has improved. The Library of Congress (and on a much smaller scale myself) suffers from having been one of the pioneers of putting photographic images onto the web. Many of those old scans now look more like caricatures rather than reproductions of the images the represent, with drastic white fringing and obvious jpeg artifacts.

Speculation on Photographs

Alec Soth starts an interesting discussion with his The art of speculation on his Little Brown Mushroom blog, where he begins by quoting a series of Tweets by Erroll Morris which attempt to give a simple account of the principles of his new book Believing Is Seeing.

Perhaps the most contentious of them is the first:

1. All photographs are posed

which on an obvious level is obviously not so.  Morris makes it true by a redefinition of the word ‘posed’, as becomes clear in his discussion of the two Roger Fenton pictures of ‘The Valley of the Shadow of Death’, one with cannonballs on the path and the other without, where he writes:

Couldn’t you argue that every photograph is posed because every photograph excludes something? In every photograph something is absent. Someone has made a decision about what time-slice to expose on the emulsion, what space-slice to expose on the emulsion.

You can only argue this if you are prepared to alter the accepted definition of ‘posed’ to mean something intrinsically different to its normally understood and accepted meaning, of something that has been set up or re-ordered or arranged within the view of the camera.  Framing isn’t posing, nor is the selection of the moment, or indeed the other decisions we all make that affect the picture we produce. His is not just a silly and circular argument, but one that erodes our critical vocabulary.

The quotation comes from the third and final of his three articles on these two pictures, where his quest to establish without doubt the order in which the two pictures were made takes him both to numerous experts in photo history and interpretation of images as well as on a field trip to the Crimea.

Public domain: US Library of Congress cph 3g09217
You can download a 50 Mb file from the Library of Congress and print your own Fenton

You can read his full three part series on line starting at Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? (Part One) which has links to parts 2 and 3.  It was certainly a painstaking exercise, but after I’d spent a couple of minutes reading a little of part 1, all I wanted to know was if he had established the answer – and whether it agreed with my own immediate photographic intuition on first viewing the image that the cannonballs on the path were perhaps rather too nicely scattered. I posted some thoughts on the matter here in Cannon Balls to Fenton when these articles by Morris were first published in 2007.

Morris’s argument – as I say above –  seems to me to be saying that if we redefine ‘posed’ to mean made using the kind of selection and abstraction that is always  involved in making a photograph (even those ones that, to quote Leon Neal, you only got “you only got … by accidentally dropping your camera as your ate your Big Mac, firing a frame of the subject … as they passed behind you“)  then all photographs are posed.  I object to this kind of abuse of language.  Let’s find the right word and use it rather than cheapen another that has a normally accepted different and useful meaning.

 Soth discusses Morris’s second point:

2. The intentions of the photographer are not recorded in a photographic image. (You can imagine what they are, but it’s pure speculation).

It seems a rather partial truth.  Soth makes the point that our speculations about the photographers intention are essential to our experience of the work, andI think it we can also say that the photographers intentions are also integral to the production of the work. Soth discusses a well-known image by Robert Frank, of the view from a hotel window in Butte Montana. Although Frank’s intentions may not be recorded in it, had they been different then he would have made a different picture. Or no picture at all.

Frank’s intentions of course made him take not just this picture, but a large number of others, and to edit and sequence them in a particular way.  And though his intentions may not be recorded precisely in the book or any individual image, both rule out many possible interpretations. What we imagine when we read the work is certainly not “pure speculation” but an impure speculation that runs with rather than against the evidence provided.

Of course each of us sees a different picture when we look at this (or any other image) constructing it from our own interpretation of what we see and what we know about it, our previous experiences and the environment in which we come across it.  We see a different picture every time we look at it, but we are likely to have both in our individual and our shared experience certain perceptions about it which are likely to be in common.  Photography isn’t just a medium, it is also a community.

Continued in Speculation on Photographs (part 2)