Bank rates

I’m not an economist. Nor a rich man, because I’ve never thought it worth my time thinking about money.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

When I grew up we had none. At least that was simple, although my mother kept careful accounts of every penny in a small red bock, balancing her accounts carefully each week to avoid getting into debt. Penny-pinching all the time, making do and mending.  But my early years were years of austerity and rationing for the whole nation, and being poor like we were wasn’t very different from being almost as poor as the rest of the people down the street.

Even on a student grant I was better off, and my first full-time job earned me more than my father ever had but I’ve never got into the habits of spending (except on cameras) and waste that most people seem to take for granted, so I’ve never had to really count the pennies.

Banks have changed dramatically since I opened my first account to handle my student grant cheque. Rather than computers there was a man in the corner sitting with a big black-covered book and when you presented a cheque the cashier would go over to him and check that your account had the funds to pay.

Now it seems they have all been busy trading with borrowed money, betting on bets in ways that no-one had thought to regulate, making huge profits for their shareholders and massive bonuses for themselves in the good times. Which have now come to an end and the taxpayers are having to pick up their massive losses.

The failure of the banks doesn’t give me any pleasure, not least because it also has resulted in a fairly dramatic fall in the value of my own investments towards a pension, which I thought (and had been assured) were reasonably safe. Oh well, its only money.

But I certainly had considerable sympathy for the protesters who organised the March on the City with the slogan ‘We Won’t Bail out the Bankers’. As usual, more details and pictures on My London Diary.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

Climate Rush – Deeds Not Words

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Women dressed as suffragettes, including Tamsin Osmond (center left) rush toward the entrance of the Houses of Parliament in London, Oct 13, 2008

Exactly 100 years ago, more than 40 women were arrested in the ‘Suffragete Rush‘ as they attempted to enter The Houses of Parliament in Westminster, London. To mark this centenary, young women concerned with the lack of political action to tackle climate change organised and led a ‘Climate Rush‘ rally in Parliament Square, calling for “men and women alike” to stand together and support three key demands:

  • No airport expansion.
  • No new coal-fired power stations.
  • The creation of policy in line with the most recent climate science and research.

It turned out – as expected – to be an interesting evening, although unlike 100 years ago none of the women managed to get into parliament and disrupt the proceedings there.  You can read more about it – and see rather a lot of pictures – on My London Diary.

Inside the building, the upper house was debating one of our more repressive pieces of proposed legislation, the Counter-Terrorism Bill 2007-08, and threw out by a large majority to proposal to allow suspects to be detained for 42 days before charge. However this is only one of several extremely suspect provisions, and we can only hope that their Lord and Ladyships will also throw out the proposals for secret inquests and look very carefully at the other provisions of the bill when they return to it in the next few days.

Lytchett Matravers

I must admit that until last week I had no idea that Lytchett Matravers even existed, let alone where it is. Nor for that matter its neighbouring village, Lytchett Minster.  And I think that is exactly how the people who live in these Dorset villages a few miles from Poole would like to keep it.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

The government has other plans, intending in its Regional Spatial Strategy to include a new town of 2750 houses in the Green belt next to it.  This private development was rejected by the regional authority who drew up the draft plans, the local authorities in the region and bodies including Natural England, the Dorset Wildlife Trust, RSPB and CPRE, but somehow found itself in the final version of the draft currently waiting approval by Hazel Blears, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

They had a big demonstration in Bournemouth to oppose the plans, and on Thursday some of them came to London to deliver a petition to the Prime Minister in Downing St.

In my lecture in Brasilia I talked about the need for a Green Belt that came about with the growth of car culture, and you can read a little about this in my post Under the Car which looks at my reaction to car culture. In Green Belt Protest Rally on My London Diary you can see my pictures and thoughts on last Thursday’s demo from Dorset. I wrote about another related event earlier in the year  here in Time Running Out.

Uganda

I’ve had a busy few days, and they started on October 9 which was the anniversary of Ugandan independence.

For gay Ugandans in particular there is little to celebrate.  Around 50 people met in a demonstration sponsored by the NUS outside the Ugandan Embassy in Trafalgar Square at noon on Ugandan Independence Day, Oct 9, to protest against human rights abuses in Uganda.

Rt-CLick and 'Show image' for larger
Peter Tatchell of Outrage! and Davis Makyala of Changing Attitudes
You can see more pictures and a longer comment on the event on My London Diary

Orphans Act- your images up for Grabs?

Although the US Senate passed the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 a few days ago, hotlined through a back door while most Senators eyes were fixed on the attempts to save the US economy,  there is still actually quite a road to travel before it becomes law, even in the USA, where it still has to pass the House.  And given that it basically alters the whole situation over copyright and intellectual property it isn’t beyond imagination that it could lead to considerable problems between America and the rest of the world, even though its perhaps more likely that many other countries will quickly slip through similar legislation.

Although most photographers are opposed to the ideas behind the US concepts of ‘orphan works’ in this and other bills, there are many others who would welcome the opportunity they offer for free-loading at our expense. These include the education industry, and Internet and media giants. At an earlier stage, Google were licking their lips over the prospect of using a million ‘orphan images‘, although probably even the weak safeguards of Shawn Bentley would queer their proposed piracy. It’s perhaps interesting to see the discussion of orphan works on non-photographic sites such as Public Knowledge.

As PDN comments,  Shawn Bentley does give some further ideas about what might be considered a ‘diligent search‘ and thus what steps we should do to protect our own work. Which of course include making sure our images contain the proper metadata – particularly IPTC copyright and creator data, and considering the use of registries such as PLUS – though it remains to be seen how usable and affordable such systems will be, particularly for low-earning freelances and semi-pro photographers.

Using Lightroom or similar software you can set up templates that add basic metadata to your images as you upload them from card to computer, including in the IPTC copyright section a copyright message, coypright status, rights usage terms and a web address for a page giving copyright information. In my case this part of the preset looks like this:

Rt Click, View image to see larger

although I’m not sure that these are exactly what are intended for these fields.

Part of any ‘diligent search‘ must surely be to look for image metadata, and I hope one  beneficial aspect of orphan works legislation (which I’m sure we will eventually get) will be to create a greater awareness of the existence of metadata and include the ability to read it into all viewing software.

Another positive result may well be an increased insistence on the proper attribution of published work, though I’m less sure that publishers will bother to do this. It really is something that photographers and their organisations should campaign more about.

I’ve always resisted putting visible watermarks on my images, but its perhaps time to rethink this, or at least to include them in an added image border. Again, software such as Lightroom enables you to automatically add a visible watermark.

Big agencies have for some years used image tracking services such as PicScout to locate unauthorised image use on the web, although these are perhaps too expensive for most freelances.  You can try out the Tin Eye beta from Idée – the easiest way to use it is to install the browser plug in and then right-click on your image on a web page and let it search. But so far its image data base seems too small to find any of mine – even where I know they are in use legitimately on other pages.

You will also need to be very careful about using image sharing services, both to look at what rights you are giving away, and also to see if your metadata is retained when the images are shown on the pages.

Gary’s Crime – Showing up the USA

 Rt Click, View image to see larger

Gary McKinnon caused a lot of red faces among top brass in the USA when he penetrated and wandered around computer systems at the Pentagon and NASA in his obsessive trawl for documents revealing their cover-up of UFO sightings.  They didn’t like their incompetence being made obvious, and want him “to fry” for it. His case is also useful in their attempts to secure large amounts of extra funding for security.

David Blunkett brought in a one-sided extradition treaty with the US through the back-door when Parliament was on holiday which means that McKinnon can be sent for trial in the US without any evidence being presented in the courts here. The only thing that can stop this now is a decision on compassionate grounds by Jacqui Smith.  McKinnon has now been diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome which is said to be the cause of his obssession. If tried here, the case would probably collapse (as an earlier hacker prosecution did) or result in a very short sentence, but in the US he might get 40 years or more in jail.

The demonstration outside the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square on Sunday was organised by the London Autistic Rights Movemeny. More pictures on My London Diary.

Al Quds Day and Iran

Controversy has grown in the last couple of years over the celebration of Al Quds (Jerusalem) Day in London.  Al Quds Day was started by Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979, and is promoted by some groups supported by the Islamic regime in Iran, which most of us have some good reason to protest against.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Police hold back marchers at Piccadilly Circus

But it is also supported by a number of groups that clearly are not supporters of the Iranian regime (though like most people they would be opposed to a US attack on Iran)  who see the day and the march as supporting the Palestinians and the Lebanese in their fight against Israeli occupation and aggression.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Not all of the groups against the march were Iranian

As a photographer and a journalist I try to approach things without closely identifying with either side, keeping a certain distance and although I always have a point of view, I went to photograph both sides of the argument.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

So you can see my pictures of the march, and also of the demonstration against the march as usual on My London Diary.  Perhaps this kind of unpleasantness could be avoided in future if groups that  support Palestine but have no connection to Iran were to organise an alternative Al Quds Day march.

National No More Fur March

Last December around 2-300 people marched from Belgrave Square in London to Harrods passing many designer shops that sell fur-trimmed garments on the way and voicing their opposition to this cruel, inhumane trade which involves the deliberate and callous ill-treatment of animals. Some of the same people were there for another march on Saturday, but in general it seemed a more middle class and polite affair, with rather more people present, nearer to 500.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Anti-fur marchers outside Prada, Sept 2008

Looking at this crowd, the organiser’s plea for them to be sensible and not to try anything silly with half the Metropolitan Police watching them (and one of the many vehicles I noticed was from the City of London force) seemed superfluous, while in December there had appeared to be rather more chance of something happening.

Policing did seem to be excessive, with officers all along both sides of the procession and more in front of virtually every clothes shop the march passed – certainly all those that sell fur.  I got pushed in the back by police on several occasions as I stood on the curb to photograph the marchers and was pulled back rather firmly as I walked onto the pavement.  Showing my press card I was told “It makes no difference.” I argued but got nowhere, so simply walked a few yards further up the road (actually towards a fur shop) where the police seemed to have no problem about me going off the road.

For once the FIT team seemed busy photographing demonstrators and I didn’t once notice them photographing me or the other photographers present.  Of course I could just have missed it, but usually they like to make sure people notice they are being watched.

In December, outside Harrods, I’d shot from inside the march:

December 2007 Harrods
Anti-fur March outside Harrods, Dec 2007

So this time I’d decided to try from the other side of the fence there:

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Anti-fur March outside Harrods, Sept 2008

Harrods is a particular target as the only department store in the country to still be selling furs. As the placard points out we have a peculiar situation here that while fur-farming was banned here, the law failed to ban the import of fur farmed in other countries – under much more cruel conditions than those were allowed before the ban here.

Ulster Practices in London

I was born and brought up a Protestant, although my own parents were considerably more open-minded than some and probably regarded Catholics  as misguided rather than as the evil followers of the Antichrist; they even knew and talked to some, though sensibly kept quiet about this.

It wasn’t in Northern Ireland, and my parents had chosen not to worship at the church where  the rest of my father’s family went, occasionally visited by and spiritually if not physically in the see of the The Rt Honourable The Rev’d Ian Paisley.

Later in my seven years in Manchester I often attended a Presbyterian church, eventually learning to cut through the preacher’s powerfully Northern Irish accent to find his views were considered and moderate.  Because of this background more than most English I feel a understanding of groups such as the Apprentice Boys of Derry, even though I don’t share their views.

Protestant marches in Ulster are a way of displaying tribal loyalty and showing a cultural defiance, a clear display both of cultural difference and of superiority. Often they have acted as a catalyst for violence between the communities, stirring up hatred that has lead to killings and maimings by both ‘Catholic’ and ‘Protestant’ terror groups.

In London, they are just celebrating a culture and I can’t imagine anyone on our streets feeling in the least intimidated or upset by their marches.  They are,  as one man put it to me – “having a fine day out and enjoying ourselves.”  But this very large man wearing dark glasses did rather spoil the effect by attempting to prevent me taking pictures and to intimidate me, pushing me backwards through the crowd and telling me very firmly to leave the area.

I don’t have a problem with people marching in my city, but I do object to being threatened and intimidated on its streets. This man attempted to justify his  unacceptable behaviour by saying that someone had told him that I was a photographer who worked for a left-wing newspaper. Unfortunately it’s untrue (I could do with the money, though left-wing publications seldom have any.) But even if I were, it would be no excuse for his attitude and his assault.

I asked him who had told him this nonsense, but he wouldn’t say – probably it was a story he had made up. The only people I recognised at the event apart from other photographers (including one who does work for a left-wing publication) were several police officers including the FIT team who have photographed me on so many occasions – although I didn’t see them doing so at this event. Unfortunately none were in the immediate area when the incident took place, and in any case I preferred to keep on working rather than stop to make a complaint.

Most of those I met were happy to talk and to be photographed, but the incident did leave a nasty taste in my mouth. If the Apprentice Boys want to get a better press in London they really need to take the lunatic fringe responsible for this kind of behaviour in hand.

More pictures on My London Diary

Pineapple Parade

Pineapple parade
The Stockwell Festival parade comes up to Stockwell station

It was good to see so many people enjoying themselves, and doing so by taking part in something with other people. Community festivals such as this have an important role in building the kind of relationships that lead to healthy communities.

But among the dancing and fancy dress I also found a reminder of violent death, Stockwell is probably best known for a murder committed there by police in 2005, when an unarmed Brazilian man was brutally shot just after boarding an underground train at Stockwell Station. The inquest on Jean Charles de Menezes opens at the Oval on Monday 22 Sept. The shrine to him at Stockwell station is in the background of a number of my images – and I also photographed it.

Jean Charles de Menezes 1978-2005
At top left the man police mistook him for – who bears little or no resemblance.

More pictures of the parade on My London Diary