Police Evidence Incriminates Police

For some years now, photographers – myself included – having been complaining about the high level of surveillance by police of us while we are doing our job at demonstrations. I’ve been videoed and photographed at almost every such event I’ve attended, often in a way that I think can only be intended as deliberate harassment. There must be thousands of images of me now on the police files, along with hours of video footage.

© 2008 Peter Marshall

Yet all that time I’ve been behaving perfectly legally, following the instructions of police even when I’ve thought them unreasonable.  The police have always denied that they paid special attention to journalists, but today on the Guardian Online site you can see a video which includes footage (video and sound commentary)  from a police unit covering the Climate Camp at Kingsnorth which clearly shows how they targetted press photographers and videographers covering the event as well as the campaigners.

The Guardian report is by Paul Lewis, Marc Vallée and John Domokos, and Marc is one of the photographers targetted, along with videographer Jason N Parkinson.  I was filmed and photographed by police on the Sunday when protesters marched from Rochester to Kingsnorth, although the surveillance then was considerably more low-key, but missed the rest of the week as I had to be in Glasgow, otherwise I would have been there too.  As well as Marc and Jason, several other photographers I regularly work alongside also appear in the clip.

It’s long been very clear that the police target journalists who cover protest – despite their protestations of denial. Now we have it clearly in their own words and images from an operational level.

Paranoia – or Standard Operating Procedures?

I’ve been thinking for a while about whether to make this post. Having at least to some extent learnt my trade as a journalist I only like to post either about things I know from direct, first-hand experience, or that I can at least in some way verify sources. In this case I have to start with the warning that I haven’t been able to do so in any way; although I’ve found the story mentioned in several different places, none of them does more than to refer back to the original anonymous blog posting, made in August last year.

About all I can tell you about the author of this chilling story is that according to the blog he is a young Asian man with an interest in replica arms who lives somewhere in south London with his parents, not far from Wimbledon station.

And one who claims to have been arrested by police in central London at gunpoint for taking photos, later being told by the officer who apprehended him he was lucky that he hadn’t been executed on the spot.  His is a story you need to read.

On his blog,  HM Ministry of Paranoia (HM MoP),  he tells how he was arrested while walking through tourist London with a Nikon D300 and a tube map for “Suspicion of a Section 58 – Possessing information likely to be of use to terrorists.

Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000 states:
(1) A person commits an offence if—
(a) he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism, or
(b) he possesses a document or record containing information of that kind.
(2) In this section “record” includes a photographic or electronic record.

It is a defence to this charge to show a “reasonable excuse” for possessing possessing or making the record, though there has been considerable dispute about what this means. You can read more about this in yesterday’s report in The Times Online of yesterday’s judgement in the House of Lords on the case of Regina v G and J., two men charged under this section of the act whose cases have resulted in appeals, eventually to the Law Lords, whose judgement I find hard to follow. Probably it is because of this case that the story on HMMoP, originally posted in August 2008, has emerged again.

On HM MoP, just before he was finally released uncharged, the man was told by the armed officer who had arrested him “Had you not have been soo compliant, I would have shot you, and you would have died“.  He writes ‘I asked him what did I do wrong, he said “Look, lets face it, suicide bombers are Asian. If I had a choice between you and him (pointing to a white colleage), id shoot you every time”. ‘(sic)

The story illustrates graphically the gulf between the laws that are debated in Parliament (where civil liberties are at least given lip-service) and the way in which they are interpreted on the ground by police.  Although we may suspect that the way the police carry them out is perhaps rather closer to the kind ideas that the bully-boys in New Labour’s back rooms would like (have you watched the preview clip of Armando Iannucci’s In the Loop?)

As I said at the start I don’t know anything more about this case than appears on the pages of HM MoP, and it would be fair to record that in its pages one policeman – the Insepector at Wimbledon Police Station where the man went to hand in his replica guns as ordered to do by the Special Branch officers – did his job properly.  But is it just my paranoia that leads me to wonder just why the last post on the HM MoP was made on October 10, 2008 and to wonder why this man is no longer blogging?

And of course, you’ll know why if >Re:PHOTO should suddenly stop posting or disappear from the web or even stop in the middle of

You can’t photograph Sewer Gratings

The latest silly story about photographers being arrested is about Stephen Clarke, arrested in Manchester for allegedly taking photographs of sewer gratings. Watch the video here.

The police also took a DNA sample and it is not on the police database, despite a ruling that such action is illegal at the European Court of Human Rights. Once the police have your sample, getting off the database is not easy.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

One man – perhaps the only one – who has managed it is David Mery, arrested in July 2005, three weeks after the London bombing – and six days after the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes – while entering  Southwark tube station on 28 July for being “calm on arrival, almost too calm” and having a largish rucksack and a strong French accent. You can read about his struggle, eventually successful – to have his DNA record removed from the database on his web site.

Emma Livingston in PDN’s top 30

I’ve often dissed the annual PDN top 30 as being geographically restricted – a very New York view of photography – although they do get nominations from people outside the city boundary, even from outside the USA,  of photographers from around the world.  Their 30, selected from 300 nominations is bound to include a number of the most promising photographers around, and has turned up some great names in past years, along with some others who have deservedly never been heard of since.

This year only about half of the photographers were born in the US, although quite a few of the others now live and work there.  None of them was born in the UK, and I think the only British photographer is Emma Livingston, who I met in Paris last year – she was born there but currently lives in Argentina. She  was working in a London gallery in 2003  when she decided to concentrate on photography.

You can see this year’s choice of “New and Emerging Photographes to Watch”  here, and it’s worth wading through, looking at the portfolios, interviews and also photographers web sites. I’ll perhaps write more on some of them later.

South London for Gaza

Saturday’s South London March for Palestine, called by Wandsworth Stop the War Coalition was supported by many organisations from south of the river and made its two mile route through the busy main roads of Balham and Tooting.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

Almost three hundred people gathered outside Balham Mosque for the start of the march, including many families, and there were banners from several trade union organisations, as well as the many placards from Stop the War and Socialist Worker and rather fewer from Palestine Solidarity  Campaign.

The march had strong support from Muslims in the area, and apart from starting at the Balham Mosque it ended with a rally at the Tooting Mosque which unfortunately I couldn’t stay for.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

For once it was an event it was a delight to photograph. Friendly people, helpful stewarding (other Stop the War stewards could certainly learn from this) and no hassle at all from the police,  who cleared the traffic and otherwise more or less kept out of the way, although they did insist that the march kept on moving. It was after all going down one of the main routes out of London to the south, the A24 Balham High Road/Upper Tooting Road, both also lined with shops and busy with shoppers on a Saturday afternoon.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

It made quite an impressive sight going along the road, as well as a great deal of noise. Many people stopped to watch it go past and many showed their support by waving and applauding. The march was led by a group of very energetic young boys in white t-shirts with blood-red hands marking them, closely followed by some of the women of all ages  in front of the main banner which was mainly held by men – with Lindsey German of Stop the War joining them a little way down the road.

There were also several photographers from the local papers present, so I hope it got some good local coverage. I posted a short report on ‘Indymedia’ which is more or less as you can also read on My London Diary, where you can see many more pictures.

SHAC City Shakedown

I’m against cruelty to animals. But even more I’m against cruelty to human beings and some of the actions taken by animal rights activists appear to me to have involved this. However there does appear to be a great deal of demonisation going on in this area resulting in heavy-handed policing and some draconian sentencing by judges. And of course, much of what you read about animal rights activists (and much else) in the papers or even hear on the BBC is simply sensationalist fabrication, usually around a very small and far less dramatic kernel of fact.

It would however be hard to exaggerate some of the cruelty that does go in in testing chemicals on animals and in intensive food farming in this country and in fur farms abroad. We should have adequate legislation on animal welfare and it should be much more rigorously enforced. But I feel much more inclined to support things like the RSPCA‘s ‘Rooting for Pigs‘ campaign (and eat bacon from pigs that are well-cared for) than the ALF.

I’ve also benefited from drugs that have been tested on animals – and I probably wouldn’t be here without them. So I’m not entirely opposed to animal testing, though I think there should be much tighter restrictions, that it should be limited to testing of essential drugs (and not cosmetics or cleaning products etc) and that there should be much more effort put into developing alternative testing methods. Again I’d very much support the RSPCA’s approach to the use of animals in research.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
SHAC get ready to march from Bank

Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC) runs a global campaign to close down Huntingdon Life Sciences, the largest contract testing laboratory in Europe, exposed on many occasions by journalists, on TV, by ex-workers and by animal rights activists – including SHAC – for various inhumane practices, breaking or ignoring regulations, incompetence and more. Home Office inspectors have also been found failing to enforce regulations.

Some of the more horrific evidence that has emerged has been about the treatment of primates captured in the wild for experiments at HLS; the company tried to stop publication of some of this material with an injection but this was overturned after a lengthy court battle. Fresh appalling evidence on their primate trade came out last year. SHAC have also exposed terrible conditions in farms breeding animals for use by HLS, as well as cruelty at some of HLS’s customers.

© 2009 Peter Marshall

The demonstration in London by SHAC last Friday was impressive in several ways, not least in the wide range of people in the 300 or so it attracted and their obvious dedication to the cause.  The march around London was to draw attention to the financial backing for HLS from the Bank of England, and also by major shareholders including Barclays, H P Morgan, Merril Lynch and AXA Investment Managers and it ended at the London NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) Euronext which lists HLS shares for trading.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

This was a well-ordered demonstration that hardly merited the extensive police presence, although the City of London Police do appear to have a more even-handed approach to demonstrations than some other forces.

© 2009 Peter Marshall
At NYSE Euronext where the demo dispersed

More at Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty on My London Diary.

Lightroom 2.3 running

As reported in my post Lightroom Recovers Again, I’ve been running the LR 2.3 release candidate since around the end of January. It solved the terrible memory leaks of LR 2.2 which caused crashes whenever you did much dodging and burning on images. This morning I downloaded the now released final version of LR2.3 – all 131Mb for the Windows version, so don’t try it on dial-up – and it’s now installed and up and running.

So far, fingers crossed, it seems identical to the release candidate and I’ve yet to find any problems. Lets hope Abobe have really got their act together now.

Also available for download is a Camera Raw 5.3 update for users of Adobe Photoshop CS4; Adobe Photoshop Elements 7.0 and Adobe Premiere Elements 7.0.  It’s of no use to me as I’m still using Photoshop 7 on those few occasions when I need to work with Photoshop.

There are very few things I need Photoshop for now with digital images, though it’s still essential for working with my scans from negatives and transparencies. But for digital files Lightroom has the convenience and speed of a ‘one-stop shop’.

Leica: A Small advance Advance for the M8

It’s good to know that Leica can sometimes change their mind and listen to customers, rather than keep on telling us that they know best. One of many complaints Leica M8 users have had is about shutter noise – and the M series was once legendary for its quietness. Many of us who sometimes like to work discretely were distinctly disappointed by the M8, which has a shutter that is intrusive in anything other than pretty noisy areas – and usually noticeable in street photography.

There was an expensive shutter upgrade to the M8-2 shutter on offer; it is a little quieter, but the depressed state of both my finances and the pound made the expense a step too far. You can listen to both the shutter sounds on the Leica site and decide if it really would have been worth the small fortune demanded

Another new feature of the M8-2 was the ability to separate the shutter firing from the re-cocking,  a ‘discreet’ mode that delayed the re-cocking while the shutter release was held down.  Leica decided not to make this available for M8 users, presumably hoping we would rush out and buy the M8-2! But instead users just went on complaining and eventually Leica have relented and made this facility available in updated firmware, available for download from today. It’s a small and very welcome step.

This still leaves one major and I think unnecessary inconvenience in using the camera for many of us (I could probably put up with what appears to be less accurate framing than the film models.) Leica’s range of wide-angle lenses, while excellent, are extremely expensive. Like many Leica users I’ve made extensive use of Voigtlander lenses, made by Cosina, which in some cases are around a tenth of the price and most of which give excellent results.

The M8 (and M8-2) has an inbuilt problem with its IR sensitivity due to the decision to use a very thin IR blocking filter. I first came across this photographing Muslim women in black burkhas and finding they came out in different shades of brown and purple. I wasn’t amused and it took hours of work in Photoshop to produce a usable file.

Leica – rather late in the day – admitted the problem and came out with a solution, supplying IR/UV blocking filters for the front of the lenses, but while this solved the colour issue, it introduced a new problem. Light from the corners of the frame goes through the filter more obliquely, thus taking a longer path through the filter and resulting in what they correctly describe as “annoying colour casts in the frame corners.” It is only noticeable when using lenses of 35mm (a standard lens on these 1.3x cameras) and below, and increases as you go to lower focal lengths.

Again Leica had its solution, detecting the focal length from coded dots on the back of the lens and allowing you to automatically apply a firmware correction in camera as the pictures are taken. Apparently it works fine with Leica coded lenses but leaves users of older non-coded Leica lenses and non-Leica lenses out in the cold. Leica will – at a price – add coding to some Leica lenses.

Those of us with lenses without coding can find independent engineers who will add coded read rings to some lenses or can try the do-it-yourself solution with a ‘Sharpie’ felt tip pen (tricky to do and although it can work, it soon wears off.)

More successful is removing the colour cast with the excellent and free Cornerfix software (for Mac and PC – the latest version 1.0.0.0 was updated January 5, 2009.) It works well, but it does add another level of processing and if you take more than a few images adds a level of time and hassle to your workflow you could do without.

While it would not be reasonable to expect Leica to come up with solutions for every lens you could possibly put on the camera, it would be a very usable solution if they allowed you to manually select from the Leica lenses covered by their coding (and thus by the firmware) so the camera would then apply a reasonably close correction.

Instead they simply recommend using coded lenses. A set that covers the same focal lengths and apertures as my existing Leica, Minolta and Voigtlander wide angles would – at current street prices – set me back around £8000.

Ashes & Repentance

On Ash Wednesday in 1982 members of Pax Christi and Christian CND went to the Ministry of Defence in Whitehall and held a religious service in protest at Britain’s reliance on nuclear weapons and the mass destruction of innocent populations these would cause were they ever to be used.

Every year since they have come back with the same message:

© 2009 Peter Marshall

in a Liturgy of Repentance and Resistance, although it’s exact form changes from year to year.

This year, outside the Old War Office, black and purple ribbons were tied to a white cross as prayers were said for those killed in wars and violence:

© 2009 Peter Marshall

It’s hard to see why we hold on to our nuclear weapons, difficult even to know who they are meant to deter now, after the end of the cold war. It was a policy that never made a great deal of sense, keeping a peace that it was in any case in no one’s interest to break.

Now it is far more about national prestige, “keeping a place at the top table” particularly in the UN, and not really about defence at all. I don’t think anyone can imagine a believable scenario in which we would deliberately fire our nuclear missiles (even if the US would give us the permission necessary.)

Far easier and much more likely are the possibilities of misuse and of these  dangerous weapons being stolen by terrorists.  The government lost all the arguments over Trident replacement but still decided it must go ahead, despite the dangers and the enormous sums of money involved. And it is of course that which is the real driver.  These weapons may be useless and outmoded, their use certainly against all reason and international law, but the profits for a small group of the rich and powerful are huge. It’s decisions like this that tell us who really runs the country whichever government is apparently in power.

More about the event and pictures on My London Diary.

Students on the March

I was fortunate to have been born in the era of the Welfare State. Not only did I grow up on clinic orange and cod-liver oil (a doubtful privilege) but education was free, or largely so. When I had to start school early because my mother was in hospital I went to a private nursery (it even called itself an ‘Academy’ to show it was posh) but that didn’t last – I was “too rough” and was expelled at the age of three.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
Students stage a sit-down in Southampton Row

But after that it was on the state, all the way from four until I graduated. My father’s earnings were low and I got a full grant to cover my living expenses at university – and managed to live on it. Of course none of us paid fees. But things are very different now than in those days when even the labour party beleived in socialism.

Of course it is much easier to get into university now. Where there were once educational hurdles there are now colleges clamouring to attract students and the money they bring – although competition for the more popular courses and places is still intense.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
Listening at the rally before the march

So I had a great deal of sympathy with the students and their protest last Wednesday.  More about it and of course more pictures on My London Diary.