Archive for May, 2012

Lensculture May Issue

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

I’ve just been looking at the latest issue of Lensculture, “an online magazine celebrating international contemporary photography, art, media, and world cultures“, and as usual it is worth a look, including some fine photography. (If you read this post some time in the future you will find this issue in the Lensculture archives as No 33)

There are quite a few things I’ve seen before, but even some of those have been revitalised – for example the pictures from a new and expanded edition of Christer Strömholm’s great Les Amies de Place Blanche, first published in 1983, and an expanded version of Robert Adams‘s Prairie from 1978 (which I thought I had bought then but can’t at the moment find.)  Other favourite projects covered in the issue include Chongqing: City of Ambition by Ferit Kuyas (surely one of the best if not the best of the many essays on the new China) and there are other familiar works such as Jocelyn Bain Hogg’s remarkable book, The Family and Simon Norfolk‘s Burke and Norfolk.

But there is other work new to me, some of which I found interesting and just the odd thing that failed to touch me. But overall this is a great read.

Big Ride And More

Tuesday, May 8th, 2012

It was a gloomy and damp day, the rain varying between the occasional spot and heavy downpour as I rushed from what for me counts as a early morning event – 10.30am at Tower Hill for Workers Memorial Day with speeches and wreath-laying at the statue of the Building Worker there to Park Lane in Mayfair for the Big Ride. Of course 10.30am isn’t really early, and only meant me leaving home around 8.45am, but I’ve long got out of the habit of early rising (and had not got to bed until after 1am.) On weekdays I don’t like to travel in the morning rush hour if I can avoid it, because it costs me two or three times as much for the privilege of often standing in a crowded train for 30 or 40 minutes. But this was a Saturday, so at least I was travelling rather cheaper and got a seat.

I arrived at Park Lane just a few minutes after the time I’d been told people would start gathering at Brook St, to see everyone around there cycling away, and thought I might have missed it.  Running with a fairly heavy camera bag isn’t my idea of fun, and I could have done without the 700 yard dash to find where the front of the ride was actually assembling and I was able to take some pictures.  The rain wasn’t too heavy, though it did cause some problems, and working as I do most of the time with a very wide-angle means their is no way to stop drops of rain getting on the lens, its effects usually impossible to spot on the small images on the back of the camera, and this made a few images unusable. Sometimes you are lucky and it isn’t in a really critical area of the picture, as in this case:

© 2012, Peter Marshall

You can clearly see the diffusion it has given on the top left of the sign reading ‘Grannies Want To Cycle Too’  although I’ve reduced the effect considerably in post-processing in Lightroom by darkening the area and increasing contrast and sharpness. You can see it again on the bottom of the flag in this picture:

© 2012, Peter Marshall

I was also trying hard to remember that 16mm is usually a mistake with bicycle wheels at the edges of the frame, and trying to work more towards the 35mm end of the lens.

Although the SB700 flash unit’s instructions are very clear about not letting it get wet, it seemed to keep working fine, and I needed a little fill from it for most of these pictures of people. I still am not quite used to the various buttons and switches on this unit, and after seeing the results  when I got home reached for my black tape.  Since I take more than 99% of the pictures on the TTL setting the unit now has a small piece of tape preventing me from shifting it from that position accidentally. It does take a bit of doing without the tape, but I found I had managed it. Similarly the switch which changes from even to standard and centre-weighted coverage is fixed at the even end. It’s easy to peel off the tape should I need to change the setting.

Incidentally I’ve been pleased so far with the SB700, though even on the wide setting I don’t think it has the same evenness of coverage I got with the SB800. But a little fall-off around the edges is often a good thing. Using the built-in ‘wide panel’ or  the clip on diffusion dome should give more even coverage for those pictures that need it. Without the wide panel in place on the full-frame camera the flash is reasonably even only for focal lengths of 28mm and above. With it the 17mm indicated on the panel isn’t quite true, but using this or the diffusion dome is generally pretty even, and with the two together, things are excellent. But there is a catch. Using the panel or the dome makes the unit much less efficient and increases the recycling time. So almost all the time I work without either.

It is largely a myth that these things make your flash softer. Neither greatly increases the size of the light source, and diffusion without an increase in size simply reduces the amount of the light emitted that misses the subject – unless there are suitable surfaces around to bounce some of it back. To get a softer effect you need a large diffuser or reflector.

For using as fill I now have the flash usually set at -0.3EV and the two camera bodies also with some negative setting, typically also -0.3 or -0.7EV. Often I seem to want a little less fill with the longer lens on the D300, so it’s convenient to use the flash compensation on the bodies to allow for this. Quite why Nikon hide away what is probably the most important information on using the flash in pages E23-E24 of the manual, after a lot of esoteric stuff on advanced wireless operation is hard to understand.

As usual I was spending almost all of the time between actually taking pictures holding my microfibre cloth over the front of the lens to keep it dry, though occasionally using it to wipe the flash too. Mostly it worked, as you can see in Big Ride for Safe Cycling on My London Diary, where there are some better pictures than in this post.

Continuing on the vaguely tech side of thing, here is a pair of pictures, one take on the D700 at 16mm with its normal rectangular perspective and the other on the D300 with the 10.5mm fisheye (almost impossible to keep raindrop free) and then converted to cylindrical perspective.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

© 2012, Peter Marshall

Of course they are from a different viewpoint but give a good idea of the different ways the two depict more or less the same subject.

After then end of the Big Ride (and again I was annoyed to find that while the organisers had said the finish would be near Blackfriars it was actually more or less at Temple, another unnecessary 700 yards I could have done without and which meant me arriving a few minutes too late) I dried out and warmed up in one of my favourite London galleries, the Courtauld Gallery.To be honest I wasn’t that impressed by the current show there, Mondrian || Nicholson In Parallel, though I did feel that while Nicholson’s work looked better for actually seeing the works, Mondrian is actually more impressive in reproduction. But the Courtauld has one of the finest collections anywhere of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist works.

Then, feeling rather better I took a bus to my final event for the day, in Whitehall, opposite Downing St, Support For Palestinian Hunger Strike. By this time the rain had almost stopped too. Again here is a pair of pictures taken with the 10.5mm and 16-35mm from a very similar position which I think demonstrate the uses of both lenses. It was of course a tableau set up for the media, the kind of thing I don’t generally relish.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

© 2012, Peter Marshall

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Two To Tango

Sunday, May 6th, 2012

One of the things that I find relatively few photographers really seem to appreciate is that much of photography is really a collaborative art. It’s perhaps obvious in some branches of photography – where would Bailey have been without Shrimpton? But most of the collaborations I’ve been involved with have been considerably less intimate, often a matter of a few fractions of a second, and are often unwitting at least in detail on the part of my photographic co-respondents.

I’ve never been a great fan of David Bailey (or of fashion as a genre, though it has provided a living for some fine photographers), but when I was invited to apply for a post writing about photography for an Internet site back in 1999 by sending a trial article, I chose to make him the subject. He had made his name by going to New York with the Shrimp in 1962, and it amused me to make my own debut as a Londoner for a New York based company with a piece about another Londoner. Looking back, it isn’t a piece I’m particularly proud of (perhaps one of the few of the hundreds I wrote that I’m pleased is no longer on line), but it had a certain edge and humour and it got me the job.

I didn’t see BBC4’s We’ll Take Manhattan which was screened in January, though I suspect I would have been unable to watch it in its entirety, but the video about its making is almost certainly a more interesting piece, and considerably shorter. It’s also worth noting, as ‘Daks’ comments on the The Arts Desk piece that as usual film-makers rewrite history to suit their purposes – as well as presenting a highly censored version of Bailey-speak.

It should also be noted that the shoot was January 1962, and Diana Vreeland did not join Vogue until April 1962; in January she was still editor-in-chief of Harper’s Bazaar. Bailey also claimed to have met Shrimpton at VOGUE studios where she was being photographed for a Kelloggs advert by Brian Duffy, who was one of the ‘terrible three’ (Bailey, Duffy, Donovan), so the BBC production was also not accurate with how they met. (Fashion Theory, Lustrum Press 1978)

Daks also goes on to point out that the BBC also showed ” a great documentary on Bailey – Four beats to the bar and no cheating“. You can watch it as four clips from a broadcast on Swedish TV starting here on YouTube. I’ve only watched a little of it so far. Or you could just watch Blow Up again.

I’ve always thought of My London Diary as being at least in part for the people who collaborate with me in the making of the pictures, some more actively than others. It’s one reason why I put so many pictures of most events on it – so that the people I’ve photographed can see the pictures I took of them. Often people will ask me where they can see the them – or if I can send them a copy – and it’s easier to give them my card and tell them they will be on the site in a few days, and that they can e-mail me.

One group I like photographing is Climate Rush, and I was with them a couple of times towards the end of April. Here’s Tamsin Omond cleaning up the London Air:

© 2012, Peter Marshall

and I think this is the best – though you can see some others too in Climate Rush Spring Clean London’s Air on My London Diary. Earlier I’d grabbed a picture of her with the duster between her teeth that I quite liked too.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

But of course Climate Rush, whose tagline is Laurel Thatcher Ulrich’s “Well behaved women seldom make history” and have adopted the suffragette slogan ‘Deeds Not Words‘ isn’t just Tamsin.  She was at the solidarity protest for the Russian anonymous women’s punk band Pussy Riot the following Monday, but the best pictures I took  in Protest Supports ‘Pussy Riot’ were not of her.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

It wasn’t easy to make a picture that included the flag of the Russian embassy (not that anyone recognises the Russian flag now) visible at the top right, and the placard – from Pussy Riot in Moscow – is perhaps a little less clear than in some of the more obvious images I took, but I felt this was an image that reflected Pussy Riot more than the others which you can see on My London Diary.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Course Report

Friday, May 4th, 2012

I didn’t take many pictures on the weekend of April 21-2 because I was at a photographic workshop.  If that seems odd, perhaps I should say I was running it, although facilitating would be a better word. Based at the View Tube, overlooking the London Olympic site during one of the last few weekends when that viewpoint will be available to the public, there were some disappointments, but I think we managed to have an enjoyable and fruitful time.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Olympic traffic management sign and Olympic torch

As usual, the main joy of the workshop was seeing how other photographers tackle the same challenges, in particular the others taking part in the workshop. Shortly I hope to be able to link to a mini web-site of some of the work that we produced which the Museum of London promised to host.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Olympic warm up area and former Bryant & May match factory, April 2003

I started the course by trying to show how other photographers and film makers had reacted to the area, including of course my own work on the  River Lea/Lee Valley 1980-2010  web site some of which is also in the Blurb book Before the Olympics, but also showing quite a range of other work, including images by the photographers featured on David Boulogne’s 2012 pics blog (which also has a little of my own work.) It was a shame that the View Tube didn’t have the facilities to display this or own work more than dimly.

One of the buildings overlooking the venue was of course the former Bryant & May match factory (above, taken a week before the course) which has been in the news this week as there are likely to be guided missiles based on one of its towers during the Olympics.  It would certainly be an ideal site from which to attack the Olympic site, but hard to see it as a good defensive position, and in the thankfully unlikely event that any of the missiles was fired and hit a target the result could be terrible casualties in the East End.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

We didn’t have any special access to the Olympic area, and the closures already in force were something of a pain, requiring some lengthy detours. Of course many of the paths that used to give access to the area – such as this one – were closed years ago.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

This picture illustrates some of the changes that have taken place. A few years ago the path here would have been narrow, surrounded by grass and low bushes and empty. The view would not have been a huge building site with the stadium and other venues but a busy and thriving industrial area with factories, oil storage and office buildings. Somewhat run down – with some of the premises serving as artist’s studios – including the interestingly named ‘Tate Moss’, in 2007 when I took the picture below already severely affected by Olympic blight and the imminent demolition. Now there is serious pedestrian congestion.

© 2007 Peter Marshall

More pictures from the area in Feb 2007 on My London Diary.

You can now see more of the pictures I took while walking around the area with the other photographers on My London Diary in Olympic Course Day 1 and Olympic Course Day 2.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Handling Disabled Protests

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

I don’t have any problems with protests by the disabled, but the police don’t quite seem to know how to deal with them, particularly when they have attracted enough attention for there to be crowds of photographers present. The latest protest by DPAC (Disabled People Against Cuts) again resulted in them being able to block a major road through central London, just as their protest in January (Disabled Welfare Reform Road Block) though this time it was at Trafalgar Square rather than Oxford Circus and on a weekday rather than a Saturday.

I can’t decide which of the two similar pictures I prefer:

© 2012, Peter Marshall

or

© 2012, Peter Marshall

When I sent off the story to Demotix, I chose the lower of the two, where I’m closer to the face of the man in the foreground and the chain is a little larger. That he is looking in my direction also makes for a stronger image. But on putting the work on My London Diary in the post Disabled Activists Block Trafalgar Square I chose the upper picture for the ‘front page’.  I like the two hands of protester and police officer on the chain, clearly linking them together. I think when I first saw them I thought that the hand and camera of another photographer at top left was an unfortunate intrusion; now I’m inclined to think that it works together with the videographer and photographer at the right to show how this protest took place with pretty massive press interest.

Incidentally, the guy with the video camera has himself been in the news, fighting not to hand over his work from the Dale Farm eviction to the police in what is clearly a ‘fishing expedition’, a move by the police that could seriously endanger the often tricky relationship between photographers and protesters. As NUJ General Secretary Michelle Stanistreet says,

“This case is a defence of press freedom – journalists are not evidence gatherers for the police.”

Earlier in the DPAC protest there had been an incident that seemed to be to be of near farce, when the police stopped the protest on the Charing Cross Road, and tried to insist that it proceed on the pavement rather than on the roadway.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

This is just one of a number of pictures that I took while police argued with protesters who they had stopped, creating a far greater traffic hold-up than if they had simply allowed the march to continue.

It wasn’t a request that the protesters were likely to accede to, not least because it was hardly a practical suggestion, given the fairly narrow and somewhat cluttered pavement and a protest with a number of people taking part in wheelchairs and mobility scooters. But it did provide a good opportunity for photographs.

Disabled people are rightly very angry, with recent changes in welfare provision and in particular the imposition of testing procedures that are ill-thought out and administered with an incredible lack of common sense, common decency and competence by a private company highly paid on a contract that rewards them for refusing benefits rather than doing the job properly.

More about the protest at Disabled Activists Block Trafalgar Square on My London Diary.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

May Day Mayhem

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

Curious things were afoot elsewhere on the web on May Day. I was busy taking pictures most of the day, finishing at the London Stock Exchange a little after 7pm where I was one of very few photographers present when OccupyLSX actually arrived at its doors and set up a token camp.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

It’s a nice story and I had some decent pictures – though it had been a day when I’d forgotten to increase the ISO as the light had dropped, and not all of them were sharp enough. People will move, and the best pictures are usually when they are moving.

So for once I put myself out and got the work ready to file within around 90 minutes of taking them. But it proved impossible to upload them to Demotix, whose servers were severely overloaded, and when I did finally manage to upload them, the server failed to process them. After an hour or so of trying I had a story with a single image visible on Demotix and it took another thirty minutes and many retries to get the rest there.

You can see the piece at Occupy London gets to London Stock Exchange on May Day
on Demotix. And eventually it will be posted in more depth on My London Diary, where of course you can see my account of their October attempt in Occupy London Kept Out Of Stock Exchange.

© 2011, Peter Marshall
In October police stopped Occupy from getting to the Stock Exchange
© 2011, Peter Marshall

I had three other stories to post from earlier in the day, but I needed to eat and sleep. I hope Demotix will have quietened down enough for me to post those later today.

Apologies For Nonsense

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

More nonsense than usual that is.  Somehow early this morning four posts appeared on the blog that I hadn’t published. This was most likely an error by my ISP who host this blog rather than a hacking attempt.

Thanks to ‘tdar’ who pointed this out to me in a comment to one of the pieces, all of which were from the ‘drafts’ folder on the site where I had cut and pasted things from various articles that were waiting for my comments, along with a few of my thoughts on some of them.