Archive for January, 2012

Bleak Housing 1978

Saturday, January 14th, 2012

© 1978, Peter Marshall

On a bitter cold but bright and sunny winter day in February 1978  I made the short trip of around 5 miles – a short journey on a suburban train and a few minutes walk – to take photographs on a public housing estate there. I’d often seen it from the train on my way into London, but had never stopped to visit before.

I’d known the area a little before and had family links. My mother had grown up in a house around half a mile away and her father had owned a shop on the nearby High St and later had been a market gardener just on the other side of the railway line. When I took these pictures one of his orchards was still visible, more or less surrounded by another recent housing estate, to the other side of the railway, and I had uncles and aunts who lived a short walk away.

Part of the reason for going to take these pictures was that I knew the estate was going to be redeveloped. Built I think in the early 60s it had been thrown up on the cheap using prefabricated units, and then used to rehouse ‘problem families’ because few people wanted to move out to Feltham. The area soon gained a terrible reputation, and became one to avoid.

A few years after I took these pictures, I went back to an adjoining area that was still standing, locked my bike to a lamp post and walked across the road to take a picture. As I turned around to do so I saw that already a small kid, perhaps around 8, was already hunting around inside the pannier I’d left on the bike, and I had to run back across the road and chase him away.  I wasn’t that surprised.

Looking back at my contact sheet, these pictures were virtually all I made there, along with a few very minor variants and one rather weaker overall view. Perhaps my favourite image was that at the top of this post, very much a graphic exercise in dividing the rectangular space into smaller rectangles.  It made those relatively small concrete slabs, perhaps each only around 2.5- 3 metres high, look immense, an effect I sometimes intensified by cropping the top and right of the image to remove the  top and right edges of that top right block, so that you could imagine them continuing for ever.

The feeling of immensity in part came from the framing and the position of the small windows of a distant building in the middle of the image, but also I think the path in the grass at the bottom played an important part. It was a kind of indicator of an absent human presence, but somehow one on which the figure my imagination supplied walking along it would actually be rather small.

It was an image I used in a small portfolio of my pictures published in a small magazine that year,  and also in a couple of magazines, as well as on the poster for a group show on urban life a couple of years later.

© 1978, Peter Marshall

This picture makes the estate feel a much friendlier place, although when I was taking it I thought of it very much as showing the estate as a cage, a prison for its inhabitants, this doesn’t really come across. Perhaps the neatness of the paths and those net curtains make it look too cosy. It’s also perhaps an image that reads too clearly in terms of space with the clear layout of the paths on the grass.

It somehow lacks the sinister which I felt I found in the next two images, both of which were for me visually dominated by that loop of rope at the top of the central post. I could only see it as a noose.

© 1978, Peter Marshall

There was not of course a body hanging from it. But I did find it spatially more interesting, and there was a kind of resonance set up within the image (at least for me) between visualising it in two or three dimensions. Almost as if those buildings were actually hanging on the foreground post rather than some distance behind.

© 1978, Peter Marshall

I tried to play a little more with that effect, moving slightly so that the post lined up more closely with the edge of both of the blocks, taking away the three-dimensional clue of the top corner of these cuboids, reducing them to quadrilaterals hanging from the post, like some odd signs.

It’s certainly a mistake to show both, because I think it reduces that effect. But I also rather like the first attempt, with the empty concrete rectangle at its centre split into two by the black line.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

34 Years On

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

Every so often I go back to the Herculean stable-cleaning task of scanning my early negatives. Since I’ve failed to to it in a single day it’s one I’m chained to for the rest of my natural. Or at least until the scanner breaks down.

At the moment I’ve reached 1978, a year when I was working full-time – with preparation and marking over 60 hours a week during term-time – at one of this country’s largest and most disorganised comprehensive schools. Most of my teaching was elementary science, but I’d also set up an ‘O’ level photography course, and there were various odds and sods that filled up my teaching timetable, on top of which like everyone else on the staff I lost much of what should have been preparation time covering for absent colleagues including a steady stream of those whose nerves had been wrecked by the job.

Nowadays most of the stress in teaching comes from Ofsted, but then it was mainly from the kids, and there were a few periods on my timetable where whatever the official designation, it was made pretty clear that so long as I prevented the kids from major vandalism or causing themselves or others grievous bodily harm I could do what I liked with them. Should I manage to teach them anything it was a bonus, and I think there were a few useful skills that I was able to impart about filling in forms, claiming benefits and the like. And if it was nice weather we’d go out for a walk, though that too had its problems.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

I didn’t often take photographs while I was at work, though I usually had a camera in my pocket, a Minox plastic folding clamshell thing, the smallest and lightest camera ever to use 35mm film, with a 35mm f2.8 lens and I think this picture, taken while I was on ‘break duty’ was made with that, though when I was teaching photography I would sometimes take in a Leica.

Some staff did break duty the easy way, taking a cup of tea to drink standing at one side of the yard and watching the kids kicking balls around, learning to ignore anything short of major insurrection. The more diligent (or stupid) of us ventured out into the peripheral areas of the fairly large school site, where mayhem of all sorts occurred (there were some schools where staff always picked up a walkie talkie for such duties, and we used to occasionally joke about picking up the AK47 as we left the staffroom, though I’d favour a blue beret. ) But these two youths are not really fighting, just indulging in a little of the horseplay that was the normal form of social intercourse amongst their group.

Possibly after photographing them (I took 3 frames, and the Minox was a pig to wind on, 2 strokes of a winder that sometimes took a great deal of pressure and  really bit into your thumb in cold weather) I went over and told them to take it easy, perhaps not. I did occasionally have to break up real fights, though fortunately these usually attracted other staff to help me deal with the large crowd that always formed around them. And once I did have to take a knife off a 12-year old who waved it at me, but that was in class. Fortunately he had no idea how to use it.

There are several reasons why I chose to photograph from behind. It clearly place it in the context of a school, with the playground in the distance, and the branches in the foreground seemed to add something to the picture. But most importantly I was thinking about the right to privacy of the two lads in this picture, who were probably 13 or 14 when I took it. Hard to think that they are now in their late 40s.
________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Bhopal & The Olympics

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

© 2012, Peter Marshall

The story was about the Olympics and the campaign to get Dow Chemicals dropped as a sponsor for it because of their environmental record, and in particular for their refusal to take responsibility for the continuing poisoning of groundwater in Bhopal after the Union Carbide plant their was abandoned following the largest ever environmental disaster yet.

The Labour Friends of India had organised a ‘photo-opportunity’ to take place in Trafalgar Square in front of the Olympic clock exactly 200 days before the start of the London Olympics, with a banner reading ‘200 days to drop Dow’ in a passable pastiche of the Olympic logo and a bottle allegedly containing water from Bhopal with a rather nicely designed spoof mineral water label as ‘B’eau Pal’ water.

Holding this was Labour MP Barry Gardiner, and also present was a woman who had been in Bhopal at the time of the massive poison gas escape that killed thousands, including her aunt.  Also present, by the time things got underway were around 3o photographers and videographers, ensuring that there was something of a scrum, as well as several of the ‘Heritage Wardens’, the Mayor of London’s security staff who hadn’t known this was going to happen and were not too happy with it.

It was tricky to get anything just a little different in such a situation and I didn’t really manage it. A straightforward picture or two of the banner and people in front of the clock – perhaps this was the best:

© 2012, Peter Marshall

and several pictures of the MP with the bottle – here’s another

© 2012, Peter Marshall

as well as several of Bhopal survivor Farah Edwards, including some of her reading her speech

© 2012, Peter Marshall

were the best I could do in the circumstances. Perhaps I might have arranged something with a little more interest, but I don’t like to arrange things. I’ve not seen any of the pictures the other photographers got, but I doubt if they were very different.

Demotix were obviously very worried about running the story, perhaps because of the draconian legislation around the Olympics here, and their claims to own as trademarks things like London, 2012 and Olympics. I twice posted a comment to the story, but all that appeared was a message saying my comment was awaiting moderation. Two days later it still hasn’t appeared. I’ve never known comments being moderated before on the site, usually they have appeared immediately.

What I posted in the comment was simple history about  Dow Chemicals and their involvement in Vietnam, both producing napalm for use by US forces (and they continued to produce it after the other companies in the business had been persuaded to halt production) and as one of the companies producing Agent Orange, a dioxin contaminated herbicide which as well as killing the crops on which the rural population depended as an intended part of the military strategy also has resulted, according to the Vietnamese, in 400,000 people being killed or seriously maimed and half a million children born deformed because of its use.

Photographer Philip Jones Griffiths heard about the effects of Agent Orange, and returned to Vietnam to take pictures. He met with a great deal of cover-up – as he wrote in an introduction to his work on the Digital Journalist site:

In almost all cases I was denied access, usually by polite smiling nuns. At the risk of sounding paranoid I became convinced they had been told to keep the press away…  I left Vietnam in the summer of 1971 without ever seeing a victim.

After the war had ended he returned – and saw and photographed the full horror of the situation. The gallery of images on-line doesn’t make easy viewing and it is a history that for me makes Dow a totally unsuitable company to sponsor either the Olympics or the Paralympic Games.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or licence to reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Lightroom 4 Beta

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

I’ve not downloaded the beta version of Lightroom 4 now available from Adobe, because I’m getting on pretty well with Lightroom 3.6 and I’d prefer to let others discover any problems – and hope that Adobe will sort them out by the time of the official release “in early 2012.” It does sound like they have made a number of significant improvements, particularly for me to the “basic tonal adjustment controls” which they claim “extract the entire dynamic range from cameras for stunning shadow details and highlights” as well as “additional local adjustment controls, including Noise Reduction, Moire and White Balance.

Some will also find the new abilities with video useful, though I’m still trying hard to avoid working with video; though I do recognise it has its uses, I find it rather frustrating and limiting, perhaps because I’m so used to thinking in terms of still images.

I don’t make a great many prints, though I have just started making the occasional one from Lightroom, and the new ability to ‘soft-proof’ should help, though I’ve never found it entirely satisfactory in Photoshop.

But if there are any photographers using digital out there who haven’t yet discovered what Lightroom can do for you, this is a good opportunity to work with the software for a decent length of time for free.  Photoshop is still useful, particularly for working with the scans I’m still making from film, but Lightroom does much more for my digital images, and does it much faster and more intuitively than Photoshop ever did.

Almost the only thing I still need Photoshop for when working with digital images are one or two plugins, particularly one I like for sorting out fisheye images. Lightroom can convert them to rectilinear perspective (which is very seldom what you want) or do a partial conversion which is generally more useful, but I often prefer the Fisheye Hemi conversion.

Lightroom takes a little getting used to, and I still find myself having to look at the help at times, but mostly I find it more intuitive than Photoshop. You can work on images with the local tools and not have to bother with layers. Lightroom stores your original files and doesn’t mess with them, and when you work with files you are creating lists of commands to be performed on the original. When you need actual files to be output, these commands are run and the resulting files produced, and you can set up presets with the file size, quality, profile etc you need for different purposes – full size high quality jpegs SdobeRGB to send to libraries, medium size sRGB files for projection, small sRGB jpegs for the web, with or without watermarks etc.

Presets are simple to understand and greatly cut down the time it takes to do what you need. They also make sure you get things right and don’t forget things. Much of what we have to do is repetitive and presets will do it for us.

Lightroom works best for photographers who don’t mind getting their files organised.  So Lightroom automatically backs up my work as I bring it from card to computer, and automatically changes file names to give every image a unique name.  I think the best way to keep track of stuff is to use the date as the first part of every file name, so this image, taken last Saturday, gets a name that starts 20120107.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

Using the date ‘backwards’, yyyymmdd means that files will sort in proper order in any folder. Its full filename is 20120107-d0528 and the original RAW file has filetype .NEF while this version is a .jpg file.

Lightroom lets you store images in a systematic way – ordered by year, month and day – and then set up collections that order them in ways that make sense for you. So this particular image might be in a collection called ‘gestures’ and it could also be in another collection called ‘Iranian’ and another called ‘Trafalgar Square’ or whatever that represents how you want to classify images. You can also use keywords or any metadata to find groups of images.

And as you may be able to see, you can also put a watermark with the wrong year in it on your images. I did make a watermark file for 2012, but I’d changed back to the earlier one to write out some files from last November and had forgotten to change back.

There are some useful plugins for Lightroom, though these are different to Photoshop plugins. One cheap and useful one that I wouldn’t be without is Jeffrey Friedl’s Metadata Wrangler, strictly a ‘post-process filter’, a donation-ware program. And I’m pleased to read that this still works with Lightroom Beta 4, though it may cost a cent (or more if you wish) to upgrade.

Bikes Alive & Nikon Flash

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

© 2012, Peter Marshall

Or perhaps I should have called this things I should have remembered on Monday night with Nikon flash. Some of the results weren’t bad, but I could have done a lot better, and found myself much of the time pressing the shutter release with nothing happening, because the camera was failing to focus, and I couldn’t work out why the focus assist illuminator wasn’t working. Two minutes and a quick check of the manual when I got home and I was kicking myself.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

I’d set Custom setting a9 AF-assist illuminator to ON, but had forgotten that this only works when the focus mode is set to S (single-servo autofocus) AND you are either focussing on the central focus point or using Auto-Area AF.

Without the illuminator, focus with the 16-35mm in low light is pretty tricky as I found, and I have the camera set (CS a2) only to take pictures when in focus. So I spent a lot of time pushing the release and nothing happening.

The other slight problem was that I had taken a picture at the start of the evening using Aperture priority, and although I had changed the working aperture back to f4 (wide open) I had forgotten to change the exposure mode back to S. Which means that the camera was adjusting the shutter speed to some quite long values to get correct exposure (or rather the selected -1 stop exposure) from whatever ambient light there was.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

Generally it works better to set Shutter Priority, selecting the slowest speed that is suitable given the subject and ambient lighting. When you move into a darker area the flash to ambient ratio will change, giving a darker background, while the closer areas lit by the flash will stay more or less the same.

© 2012, Peter Marshall

You can read about the protest and see more pictures in Bikes Alive – End Killing Of Cyclists on My London Diary.
________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or licence to reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Country Doctor

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

Gene Smith‘s ‘Country Doctor’ was instantly recognised as a major achievement when first published in 1948 in Life, though had he been alive and working now he would have been lucky to have got more than 3 or 4 pictures in print. The Life Classic feature shows the 28 that made up this essay, and elsewhere another 11 that didn’t make the cut.

It’s certainly good to be able to look back at one of the great classic photo-essays on line, though perhaps a pity that they don’t show the page spreads as they were published.

Thanks to NPR for pointing me to this feature from their own Revisiting ‘Country Doctor,’ A 1948 Photo Essay though I’m surprised that they decided to put their own set of a few images from it in the article rather than linking to the full (and better quality) set at Life.

Yesterday I visited the  MA Photojournalism and Documentary Photography Final Show 2011 at the London College of Communication at the Elephant and Castle, entitled ‘Neither Snake Nor Lizard‘ which is supposedly open until Saturday, although unfortunately a few bits have already disappeared.

Probably the most impressive parts I could see were some of the books that the photographers had produced (using Blurb etc), along with one or two on-screen presentations. Other than those (and the videos may be on line) you are better off viewing the web sites of photographers that are linked from the show site. And certainly some student’s work did look better on screen than in the prints on the wall. This is perhaps as it should be, because if there is any outlet at all for documentary work it is probably either as books or as on-screen presentations. And photographic books as I read somewhere earlier today (and can’t remember where or the exact quote) are more of an “organised hobby” than a career option.

The work that I felt was strongest was almost entirely that which was more obviously documentary, whereas despite the course title some of what I saw seemed to lack the kind of purpose and clarity which is at the essence of the genre (and arguably of the medium as a whole.)  I did begin to wonder at times whether the course had been designed to divert photographers from documentary rather than nurture them in it, and certainly some looked more like commercial or fine art photographers (which will make it easier for them to earn a living!)  Fortunately they seem to have failed at least with some of the students and there was some work which showed the kind of dedication to the subject which might have gladdened Smith’s heart.

Free Shaker Aamer – A Plague of Photographers

Monday, January 9th, 2012

On Saturday I went to photograph a protest marking 10 years of illegal detention in the US prison camp at Guantanamo Bay which was taking place on the North Terrace of Trafalgar Square. I’d put this in my diary some weeks earlier, having been given a flyer about it by one of the organisers, who had also sent me several press releases. I’ve photographed other related events over the years, sometimes being the only photographer present and more often with just a handful of others, though a few have been high profile media events.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Shut Guantanamo – End 10 Years of Shame

I wasn’t pleased to receive an e-mail the day before the event which had been sent by an Editorial Assistant at Demotix, one of the on-line sites where I submit images and stories giving details of the event and begging photographers to cover it, because I knew that this would mean the event being swamped by people with cameras, and it was. In my account on Demotix I estimate the number of people present at the protest at around 200; what I didn’t say was that over a third of those were there to take photographs. Possibly they even outnumbered the protesters.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Free Shaker Aamer – an ‘Anonymous’ protester in a ‘V for Vendetta’ mask and ‘Metropolitan Peace’ uniform

Don’t get me wrong. Anyone present with a camera has as much right to be there and take pictures as I do. But among the photographers I met there were at least a dozen of us who regularly send pictures to Demotix, including some whose work is generally as good as anyone working for the press or conventional agencies (and a few of them were present too.)  Demotix would have had far more pictures than it needed without sending out the request. And almost certainly it would have had better pictures, because the crowd of photographers it had been partly responsible for generating made it difficult for all of us to work. It does seem to be shooting itself (and certainly its more regular photographers) in the foot.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
The line of ‘detainees’

The excessive number of photographers did not only make it difficult for us to work, with other photographers constantly walking into pictures as we were taking them (and I’m sure I walked into other people’s pictures – and a couple of times I realised I had done so and apologised) but also made the event less satisfying for those taking part.  One elderly woman grumbled to me “why do cameramen think they are more important than the rest of us” as I tried to get out of her way after taking a few pictures of one of the speakers, and I didn’t stop to enlighten her as I was busy working. Of course I try to disrupt events as little as possible and to keep out of people’s way as much as I can (although I admit some others are rather less careful) but in the end I have a job to do, and doing it badly would help no-one.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Photographers, protesters in orange jumpsuits with Guantanamo prisoner numbers and Nelson

Of course ‘cameramen’ – and ‘camerawomen’ of whom there were quite a few present  – are vital to events such as this, whose purpose is to gain publicity for the cause.   So I was sent a ‘media release’ (also on-line) which told me about the ‘Photo opportunity’ when ‘activists dressed in orange jumpsuits and black hoods will perform a visual display representing the 171 prisoners who remain at Guantánamo.’

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Free Shaker Aamer – a Londoner still in Guantanamo after almost 10 years

Photographically – apart from avoiding other photographers filling my frame and a few problems with exposure, particularly in some of the close pictures – if a black hood more or less fills the frame you do need to think more about exposure than the time allowed, as auto systems increase the exposure to make it mid-grey.  Then there was the problem of just how transparent you want those black hoods to appear – and Lightroom does sometimes make it possible to show rather more than could actually be seen.

© 2012, Peter Marshall
Anonymous ‘V for Vendetta’ Guy Fawkes mask inside a black hood

I also wanted to make clear exactly where the protest was held, and for most of the pictures chose to include either Nelson up there on his column, or the fairly recognisable portico of the National Gallery. And yes, quite a few of my pictures I did reject because they had photographers or parts of them in the wrong place – at times it just was not possible to avoid them when taking the pictures.

As I’ve remarked before, I’ve photographed quite a few events related to the illegal detention of prisoners at Guantanamo, and for some of these I have been either the only photographer taking pictures or one of a small group. Unlike most photographers, I almost always get my stories and pictures published somewhere, even if I have to do it myself here or on My London Diary. It’s a shame that few of them make the mass media, but even my own sites have a larger readership than many small publications. I started My London Diary in part because so much that was happening in London, and protests in particular, were ignored by the conventional media.

The focus of the rally was a call for the release of Shaker Aamer, held initially in Bagram and then at Guantanamo, imprisoned without trial and tortured repeatedly. He was cleared for release by the US military in 2007, and by Obama’s administration in 2009 but somehow remains held there, probably because of the embarrassment his testimony after release would cause to the US. A London resident who went to Afghanistan as a humanitarian worker, he has a British wife and four children, including a son aged 10 who he has never seen who live in Battersea, south London. There are grave concerns for his physical and mental health.

The protest also called for the Algerian detainee Ahmed Belbacha, who lived in Bournemouth from 1999 to 2001, shortly before his detention, to be allowed to return to the UK. He was also cleared for release by the US military in 2007 but cannot be released to Algeria because the threat to his life.

My story and pictures in Shut Guantánamo: End 10 Years of Shame on My London Diary.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or licence to reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Hard Disk Data Rescue

Sunday, January 8th, 2012

As I write, I’m copying files from a hard disk in one of my dead computers across to my new machine. Probably most if not all of the images are somewhere on a backup CD or DVD, but it is rather handier to have them more easily available.

Unless you are a geek rather than (or as well as) a photographer, you may not know that it is usually easy to recover files from hard disks. Even if the computer refuses to boot from the disk it will probably still be working and if so almost certainly still contains most if not all of your files. Of course I knew that police or military intelligence or expensive data-recovery services could get you work back. And I thought I could probably fit the old disk into a new computer (so long as it had the right kind of connectors.) But what I hadn’t really realised was how easy and cheap it was to simply transfer the data.

The tiny bit of gear I bought is a ‘USB 2.0 to SATA Hard Drive Kit + Power Adapter‘ and cost me £12.95, and can transfer from 2.5″ and 3.5″ IDE and SATA drives to a USB port. It comes with various connectors and also a power supply with various connector types. Finding the right ones to get a power and data connection to the hard disk took a couple of minutes as I couldn’t be bothered to remove the drive from the system unit and it wasn’t easy to see inside the box, but other than that it was simple.

If I could be bothered to undo a few screws (and I may in time) I could simply remove the old drive from the machine and slot it into a ‘Smart Dock’ which cost just a few pounds more, and I may do so in time. I did wonder if this might be a sensible alternative to the growing line of external hard drives on the desk to my right, but at the moment it seems to be slightly cheaper to buy these in sensible capacities that bare hard drives.

Something that most photographers possibly know is that if police or security grab your camera and delete images or even format the card in your camera it doesn’t really remove your images. You should also know that they have no right to do so, or to ask you to do so in the UK, but unfortunately  too many don’t know the law or chose to ignore it. If you are a journalist (and a UK press card will evidence this) they don’t even have the right to look at the images without a court order. So long as you take no more pictures on the card, the files will still be there and can be recovered on your computer using rescue software such as Sandisk Rescue Pro.

There was a rather unexpected bonus to unplugging one of my hard drives. After I’d finishing copying a hundred GB or so from it I shut it down, unplugged the USB lead from the other computer and the power supply lead from the transformer and then thought I’d just try starting up the old machine again. After sitting there useless for around a month (my IT technician who had rebuilt it has been having other problems) it started up without the slightest hiccough, although as well as the drive I had removed, another is not yet accessible. If I can work out which it is I’ll try connecting that up with the . That still leaves two rather large working drives and gives me access to a lot more files without having to find off-line backups on DVD, CD or currently unconnected external drives.

It’s also the machine into which my film scanner is plugged, and assuming it keeps on working, it means I can return to the slow business of producing  high res scans my ancient negatives with the Minolta Multi-Pro.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or licence to reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Dinosaur Bones?

Sunday, January 8th, 2012

I’m very much a fan of A D Coleman. Like him (and I hope he will not take offence at my simplistic reduction of views which he expresses so eloquently and in detail in the essay  ‘Dinosaur Bones: the End of Photo Criticism‘*) I subscribe to such antediluvian views that photography critics should know something about photography and actually take a good look at photographs if they want to say anything of value.

Dinosaur Bones is an essay well worth reading and thinking about and indeed discussing, and again I have nothing but admiration for the fact that Coleman decided, despite previous bad experiences, to take part in four on-line discussion groups which had expressed some wish to examine his ideas.

In the two most recent posts on his blog (Forumization and Its Malcontent (1) and Forumization and Its Malcontent (2) – a series to be continued) he addresses some of his dissatisfactions at that experience, which as he states, confirmed his earlier thoughts:

“However, I do want to note that, a decade-plus later, the lessons of 1999-2000 got confirmed: (a) forums inevitably descend to the level of the lowest common denominator of their participants, and (b) forums can suck up energies more fruitfully expended elsewhere, easily turning into rabbit holes down which you disappear.”

As someone who has taken part and still lurks in several such forums (only fora if you are an ancient Roman) these are truths I hold to be self-evident. That does not mean that these forums are of no use, but rather that you need to approach them with care and retain a certain emotional distance. It seldom takes long to decide which of the participants are worth listening to and on what, and that there are discussions best ignored or where having once firmly stated your point there is little to be gained from continuing an argument with the ignorant and obtuse.

Some of those lowest common denominator participants, even those who  have played leading roles in self-aggrandising flame wars, perhaps even the person who Coleman describes as “an equal opportunity bully” and a “loose canon” are those who actually get things done outside of the forum in the real world, often acting as a catalyst for others. Their bad behaviour on-line has sometimes been a misplaced application of a real passion for the subject, an enthusiasm to communicate this to others – and in some cases a pioneering mastery of some aspects of the subject of the forum.

Certainly there are some people who are just not good forum participants, and Coleman is probably one of them. A basic qualification is the ability at times to sit on your hands and not press the reply button. But in this particular experience it would not be fair to blame him in this respect, as he had been invited or persuaded to take part in discussions on his article.

Equally there are also people who take part willing to share, sometimes in great detail, their own practices, and to give information and advice when asked. These people are a great resource and it is not that difficult if you follow a forum for some time to sort them out from the know-all muppets (though it is a distinction many people fail to make over some equipment reviewers.)

Although I share many of Coleman’s thoughts about the act of criticism and particularly of photo criticism, I come to it from a different place. I have never thought I would be able to support myself as he has by criticism, although for a period of seven years it was a significant part of my writing about photography that did supply much of my income.

I started writing about the shows I went to as a personal diary in the 1970s, more or less as soon as I had the time to pursue a serious interest in photography. I felt then as I still do now that a study of the work of others, both historic and contemporary, was essential to my own intelligent progress as a photographer.

It always begins for me with an engagement with the image, whether standing in front of it on an exhibition wall, sitting at home with a book or looking at a computer screen. Of course it doesn’t stop there, but the actual images have to be at the centre of photographic criticism.

Surprisingly, very few people who have become well-known as photography critics or review photography shows in the mass media seem comfortable with thinking about images (Coleman is of course once of the exceptions.) It doesn’t surprise me to find that Susan Sontag, the writer of possibly the most widely read book which is on every college photo course reading list, ‘On Photography’ later said – as he quotes (at greater length) “I’m not a photography critic. I don’t know how to be one.”  I read the book when it came out, and my copy was soon covered in my scribbles on her failure to know or understand our medium. It was a good TV programme, full of nice effects and half-truths but little substance.

As Coleman later says, post-modernist critics have concentrated “on a small roster of photographers and artists using photography — Jeff Wall, the Bechers and their students, Barbara Kruger, Richard Prince, Cindy Sherman, Andres Serrano, Alfredo Jaar, Laurie Simmons, Robert Mapplethorpe...” at the expense of “much wider range of significant work, past and present.” I think it is a shared lack of a real knowledge of the history of the medium that lies at the root of this. And I also think that some of those on the approved list have contributed little or nothing to photography, as I’ve at times made clear on this site.

Dinosaur Bones‘ deserves a much longer study and discussion than I’ve so far given it, and certainly deserves a careful reading by all those with an interest in photography.

In it Coleman points out he was an early adopter of digital technology, like me publishing his first web site in 1995. He has gone to such recent productions as Pepper-Spray Cop: The Lt. John Pike Saga, first in a series of Kritikomix, as well as in his satirical alter-ego The Derrière Garde‘s  Megyn Kelly’s MK-9 Pepper Spray for Kids! which frankly I wish he hadn’t. He promises a video and a podcast of Dinosaur Bones for later too which will probably be of more interest.

In 2011: That Was The Year That was, Coleman publishes an impressive review of the year, which he begins by saying that the ‘Photocritic International‘ in 2011

“had served at least 200,000 pageviews and perhaps as many as 2 million since its premiere in spring 2009. (This unclarity results from divergent reports from several different site analysis programs.) Even at the low end of that estimate, it remains the most widely read blog by any critic/historian of photography.)”

Not a bad record, but the annual figures for this >Re:PHOTO blog which I’ve just checked after reading this are significantly higher for 2011, with over 600,000 total visits and over 1.4 million page impressions.  My other main site, My London Diary, got around 800,000 page impressions and the total for all my sites (including a few small non-photographic ones) was over 3.2 million. But then I’m primarily a photographer rather than a critic, and perhaps all this shows is that photography is more popular than criticism. If so, it’s probably healthy.

At the moment I get no direct income from any of my work on my own web sites, including this, and though the occasional sale of a print or repro licence probably more than covers the actual costs it doesn’t begin to pay for my time. At the time I began writing this blog I was writing for money on a site where adverts sometimes seemed to me to dominate the pages and I deliberately set this up – as my previous web sites had been – as an advert-free space.

Lately I’ve been wondering about adding a donations button or more probably a link to a donations page to these pages, or perhaps a Flattr button or some other way to generate a little income. I’d be interested in any comments on that either here or by email. For the moment I’ll perhaps just start adding a little advert for my own work at the bottom of my posts, something like this:

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or licences to use images

________________________________________________________

* the text of a lecture he first gave at the Hotshoe Gallery in London on November 8, 2011 which I unfortunately missed.

Eggleston – Early Colour

Friday, January 6th, 2012

The unseen chromes of legendary American photographer William Eggleston gives an interesting second view of his early work. Eggleston took 375 transparencies to show John Szarkowski at MoMA which he selected from a collection of around 5000. Szarkowski cut the number back to 75 for the  seminal 1976 ‘William Eggleston’s Guide’ and reduced that number still further to 48 for the exhibition catalogue.

Thomas Weski has gone back to the roughly 5000 Kodachromes (there were a few Ektachromes and Agfachromes in among them) which Eggleston made between 1969 and 1974 and together with the photographer selected a further 364 images which have now been published by Steidl in a 3 volume collection aimed at wealthy collectors (UK £220.00, US $345.00, EC €248.00), Chromes – you can see around 14 pictures on the Steidl site and rather more here.

Mark Holborn wrote an introduction for Eggleston’s book ‘Ancient And Modern‘ which mentions perhaps his most famous image, Red Ceiling, which most will be familiar with. The final image of the slideshow on ‘Wallpaper’ linked above, the blue volume of the three, came as something of a surprise.