Money Running

Perhaps the saddest thing for me in the whole of the Mayor’s Thames Festival (and there were also a few delights)  last weekend was this structure in Jubilee Gardens, used for a performance by Urban Freeflow, a professional group of ‘freerunners‘.

I first came across this urban sport a few yards away, with groups of young men developing their skills on the buildings of the Shell Centre and the South Bank complex.  It’s a sport that was started in France, in the Paris suburb of Lisses by David Belle and given the name ‘parkour‘, and most of those involved in it seem very much against the kind of competitive aspect that is being brought into it with sponsorship by Barclaycard.

May 2004
Parkours on the Shell Centre, May 2004

There are some spectacular parkour videos on YouTube, many of which feature short sequences from the South Bank, but one I can’t resist sharing with you, although perhaps not the most spectacular is Parkour Generations‘s  City Gents, which gives a rather different perspective on the journey to work!

On his blog, ‘traceur’ Ben Nuttall, a student from Sheffield writes: “I’m totally against competition in parkour, it’s completely wrong in the philosophy of the discipline which is about self-improvement, continual progression at a naturally-defined pace, and the achievement of being better than we were yesterday rather than being better than Fred is today. Competition only causes people to find the need to show off, perform stylish flashy moves, and attempt things they are not physically or mentally prepared for and trained for. Competition is about winning and being better than someone else, which is not why we do parkour, and if it is, then what we are doing is certainly not parkour.”

It isn’t an activity I’ve taken a great personal interest in, having absolutely no head for heights – I often find myself shaking too much to take pictures when standing on even very low fences and walls to get a better viewpoint – but the event in Jubilee Gardens seemed to sum up  something about the way that commercial interests increasingly appropriate aspects of our lives in pursuit of profit.

I’d like to make it clear this isn’t a specifically anti-Boris rant. I’ve enough against him for throwing away public money by cancelling the cheap oil contract with Chavez and back-pedalling on congestion charges while pushing up fares – policies which put public transport in the capital at risk.  Thames Day after all was one of Ken’s ideas and I felt much the same about similar events – including many of those in Trafalgar Square – organised during Ken’s time in office, as well as some of those organised by London Boroughs of various political hue.

south bank

I didn’t stay to watch the performance, though I’m sure it delighted the crowds. I’ve seen plenty of circus acts and there was one around the corner, as I walked across the Jubilee bridge. On the other side I came across another symbol of our declining nation, newly installed turnstiles at the public toilets on the Embankment. For the moment at least, those in Trafalgar Square remain free – as too is our fine National Gallery there. It’s a great collection and I should visit it more often.

Stop Forced Deportations to Iraq

Around thirty demonstrators held a lunchtime vigil outside the London Home Office on Thursday 11 Sept, 2008 to oppose the unfair detention and forced removal of Kurdish Iraqi asylum seekers from the UK, which has resulted in an unknown number of deaths.

Kurd's vigil

Some Kurds have accepted voluntary return to Iraq, often forced on them because they are prevented from working in this country and have to rely on charity of friends and a few small groups supporting them.

One of those who eventually signed to go back was Kalir Salih Abdullah, a former fighter of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) who claimed asylum in Britain in 2000, having fled leaving his family of six in Kurdistan.  He spent five years pursuing his claim for asylum without success, before desperate circumstances here led him to sign voluntary return papers, and he was returned at the end of March 2005.

In Feb 2006 he was kidnapped outside his home, apparently by the PUK, and his family have since been unable to find out what has happened to him. His teenage daughter, traumatised by his disappearance, committed suicide.

The protest at the Home Office included members of the families of two men who died this August. The UK tried to send the dying Mohammad Hussain back to Iraq after 8 years here this May,  but his lawyer made a successful challenge to the order, and he died here on 3 August.

Hussein Ali  was forcibly returned to Kurdistan on 7 August this year. Three days later he committed suicide.

Since 2005, this country has forcibly returned around 500 Iraqi asylum seekers to Kurdistan, claiming despite considerable evidence to the contrary that this was a safe area to which people could be returned without risk. Little information is available about what has happened to most of them – and once they have left Britain there is little evidence that our government gives a damn. Even worse, in July this year they started deporting Iraqi asylum seekers to Baghdad. Of course there are people inside the government and the Home Office who want to treat asylum seekers in a humane fashion, but they are fighting – and largely losing – against policies designed to appease the tabloid press. Two people from the Home Office did come out to accept a letter to Jackie Smith and a folder of evidence.

As I went to take photographs, one of the two police officers came to ask who I was saying “We have to know who is coming to these things.” Well, “NO” I thought, “you have no need to know and no right to know as this is a perfectly legal activity” but handed him my press card and watched as he examined it and wrote down the details in his notebook.  It’s easier not to make a fuss – and I know were I to do so I could be asked to give my name and address – and it would be and offence not to comply – and possibly subjected to a “stop and search.”

I think there is also a perhaps more important point. By paying so much attention to trivial things like people photographing protests such as this, the system gets jammed up with irrelevant data, making it much less likely that important things will be spotted.

 pavement piece

Next to us on the pavement, under the feet of the demonstrators is a piece of public art in which people are invited (it is continuing for 25 years from its start in 2006) to write a short statement about what being British means to them. Most of the statements seemed to be about the freedoms that we enjoy – to travel, to work etc.  I’m tempted to send in as my contributionto this work: “Because I am British I keep having to show my ID to the police and am likely to be stopped and searched without good reason while doing my job.” But that might just be seen as critical of the Home Office – one of the things that is explicitly disallowed for this art work.

More information on the Coalition Against Deportations to Iraq web site at  and more of my pictures from the event on My London Diary.

Minneapolis

This morning I’ve been following a little trail that actually started from and item on PDNPulse which they had picked up from the Minnesota Indpendent .

The MI story listed 42 members of the news media who were arrested or detained during the policing of the protests outside the Republican National Convention (RNC) there, and two further names had already been added in comments on their story when I visited the site.

It’s hard to know how many of them were photographers (or videographers) because in many cases only the name of the organisation they were working for is given, but certainly more than the 11 listed by PDN are described as such in the MI story – and the two extra names are also photographers. But all 44 were media workers – and most if not all will have had ID to make that clear.

And of course in these days it’s a fair bet that most of them were carrying and using cameras – like Seth Rowe mentioned below – even if they are not called  ‘photographers.’

Vlad Teichberg of the NY new media art group ‘Glass Bead Collective‘ and two colleagues were detained by Minneapolis police and searched; police confiscated their cameras, computers and notes for several days (perhaps surprisingly for a new media group they even had a camera with film in it, and  apparently the police examined this in daylight but couldn’t see the pictures) but was released without charge.

In a short video clip on MI, Teichberg makes the point that there are just so many cameras around now that we have passed the point where police can actually stop videos of them behaving badly appearing on sites like You-tube, and that their only sensible response now is to keep within the law. It’s a point the police have yet to grasp.

On the Minneapolis Sun, Seth Rowe, community editor of the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor writes about how he talked to the police chief about the situation and then went there determined to follow police instructions – and found himself arrested for doing just that. He gives a lengthy eye-witness report of his treatment, which suggests that many of the arrests were made simply to boost the pay of the officers concerned.

Another account worth reading comes from AP photographer Matt Rourke and was posted on the MinnPost web site along with the last picture he took before his arrest. Rather curiously the police allowed him to hand his camera over to a colleague when he was arrested.

The story also mentions – though rather unsympathetically – some of the other media workers arrested, with links to a couple of popular videos of their arrests which you may have already seen. If not they are also worth a look.

Press Freedom Under Attack

I’ve written a number of times about the increasing harassment that I and other photographers who document protest have been getting from the police over recent years. It’s  got so bad that NUJ General Secretary Jeremy Dear held a one-man protest outside New Scotland Yard this March, photographed by around 20 of us.

Jeremy Dear at New Scotland Yard

At least on that occasion the police didn’t bother us, although they did refuse to accept a letter from Jeremy Dear at New Scotland Yard, refusing him access to deliver it – he was told to put a stamp on it and post it.

This is a police station - you can't come in!
This is a police station – you can’t come in!

Other recent posts have looked at the repeated searching of photographers covering the Climate Camp (Police States – Hoo and Beijing) and the Smash Edo demonstration in Brighton.  A more general piece looked at the deliberate use of ‘Photography as Intimidation‘  by the police both against the press but also against demonstrators and also – praised by Home Secretary Jackie Smith – against those who police have identified as “persistent offenders” on some problem estates.

Those of us who believe in law in order and order in law feel that persistent offenders should be brought before the courts with proper evidence rather than suffer summary victimisation by  police officers.

At the Trade Union Congress in Brighton, Jeremy Dear moved a motion which called for a rethink of government policies that put journalists at risk of imprisonment just for doing their job which was adopted unanimously. His speech was brief but cited various examples of harassment of journalists, and in it he mentioned a video giving more details. You can read some of his speech and see that video on the NUJ site.


More pictures of me – as at every demo –  this time from a distance

The video, Press Freedom: Collateral Damage, is filmed , written and directed by Jason Parkinson, who I first met when he was held inside a police cordon at  the Colnbrook Detention Centre with police refusing to accept his NUJ card as genuine (it happened to me too at the tank auction at Excel last year- see Bad Press?) The producer of the film was Marc Vallée, who I wrote about when he accepted an out of court settlement earlier this year for a police assault that put him in hospital at the ‘Smash Parliament‘ demo in Parliament Square in 2006. Others involved in making the 9 minute video were Jeremy Dear as Executive Producer, Roy Mincoff for Legal and additional footage by Rikki Blue.

Police Medics treat Marc Vallee

I was taking pictures at most of the events covered by the film (and you will find them on My London Diary as well as often on Indymedia and in picture libraries), and there are fleeting glimpses of me at several points in the film but fortunately no more.

All of us suffer the kind of harassment you see and hear about, although it’s fair to add that there are other officers who apologise to us for the way we are treated by others and  for the orders they have to carry out. And at times some are helpful. One once told me he had been given an official warning for being too friendly to me. So perhaps I shouldn’t mention it.

Although relations between individuals can sometimes be good, we do seem to be increasingly faced with an official policy of restriction and harassment, of trying to prevent us from reporting what is happening.  Jeremy was absolutely right when he called it “a co-ordinated and systematic abuse of media freedom“, and equally right to set it in a wider context of the use by an intolerant government of “blunt instruments” of the Terrorism Act, SOCPA and other restrictions on the personal liberty of all citizens. As he said towards the close of his speech,  “The price is too high. Less liberty does not imply greater security. It never has.

Israelis find firing at journalist ‘reasonable’ and ‘sound’

Reuters cameraman Fadel Shana, age 24, filmed an Israeli tank in Gaza on April 16, recording the flash from its muzzle, around a mile away, of the shell that killed him and several civilian bystanders.  He had been working in Gaza for Reuters for three years and two years ago was wounded when an Israeli aircraft fired a missile at a marked press vehicle in which he was travelling.

IN his blog the Deputy Director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, Robert Mahoney, reports that the Israel Defence Forces’ (IDF) confidential inquiry into the killing has concluded that the decision to fire a shell at an unarmed and clearly identified TV crew, acting in a perfectly normal manner for reporters was “reasonable” and “sound.”

It’s a decision that appears to fly in the face of the rules of war, which oblige soldiers to do everything feasible to verify that targets are military and makes the deliberate or reckless targeting of civilians – including the press – a war crime.

Human Rights Watch report that the shell was a flechette shell, which explodes before impact releasing hundreds of dart-like projectiles in the air with the intent to kill people in a wide area around its target. Human rights groups have repeatedly urged Israel not to use these weapons in Gaza because they indiscriminately kill civilians around the actual target – as was the case in this event.  (There is a yellow flash on the video which may be this explosion)

Eyewitnesses report that there was no fighting in the vicinity at the time of the incident and that the Reuters truck, clearly marked ‘TV’ and ‘Press’ had actually driven close to the tank twice earlier in the day. Those observing in the tank had clearly seen that something was being set up on a tripod, and Mohaney claims there were 4 soldiers – the tank commander and observer in both the firing and spotting tanks – with state of the art equipment that would have enabled them to view the scene clearly. They should thus have also been able to see the blue ‘press’ body armour and the clear ‘Press’ and ‘TV’ signs on the vehicle. It is hard to escape the conclusion that either they didn’t bother to  consider the possibility of innocent civilian activity (press or otherwise) before opening fire, or else deliberately targeted the press.

Reporters take great risks working in conflict zones, and far too many are killed or injured, even when they are not deliberately targeted. As you can read on the CPJ site, so far there are 24 confirmed journalist deaths in 2008, along with another 15 as yet unconfirmed  and one missing.

Byzantine Photographs

Thanks to a post on Indymedia I got to read the story posted on ‘Byzantine Blog‘, Deceiving the World with Pictures posted on Aug 12,  which cast some doubt on some pictures from  Georgia by Reuters photographers David Mdzinarishvili and Gleb Garanich, suggesting they were staged.

According to blog comments, Reuters has now re-captioned some of these pictures and allegedly removed others but you can view a set ‘Crisis in Georgia‘ which includes pictures by Mdzinarishvili and Garanich, including three from the two sets those the blog labels as fake, and you can find others from the scenes by a search on the Reuters site.

The evidence on ‘Byzantine Blog’ certainly raises doubts, and though at first I thought they had discovered something, having seen more of the pictures I’m fairly convinced the pictures are genuine.  Take a look and see what you think. It’s also worth looking at the comments and the pair of pictures it mentions on another site.  You can also see the story and read more comments (for, against and mainly pro and anti-soviet rants) on Russia Inside Out.

In real life things are as simple and straightforward as many of the comments suggest, and in the chaos following an air raid almost anything may happen.

Work on the Reuters site that shows Mdzinarishvili and Garanich as phtoographers doing a great job working under what must be difficult circumstances, I’d certainly be inclined to give both the benefit of the doubt – even if I had any.

Photos are of course staged all the time for various reasons, but it is important that those that have been staged are not represented as news. I’m sure Reuters would agree wholeheartedly, and when they were made aware of the actions of Adnan Hajj with Photoshop, he was quickly fired.

A lengthy post with the title ‘The Reuters Photo Scandal’ looks at these and other images from Lebanon on Zombietime, a San Francisco based site that perhaps requires reading with salt shaker to hand and that I would not recommend exploring too fully.  But some of the examples it gives are interesting and leave little doubt that photographers are sometimes manipulated by being offered good picture opportunities, and that in other cases they have set out to deliberately manufacture news.

Notting Hill – I went home early on purpose

There are two kinds of photographers when it comes to covering violent or potentially violent events, those like to keep safe and those who seem to hunt out trouble. I found out which I was pretty definitively on May Day in 2000, when I was in the middle of a surging crowd in Whitehall and a few yards away people started smashing the windows of that well-known fast food shop.

May 1, 2000
A woman shouts at demonstrators from behind a police line

My immediate thought wasn’t to rush and push my way through the packed bodies to get pictures, but to think whether I wanted to take pictures that might incriminate those involved. And I pointed  my lens away and photographed instead some of the reactions to the event, including those of the police who after giving the demonstrators time to trash the place decided to move in, incidentally with a an entirely gratuitous violent assault by one officer on a photographer standing close to me – unfortunately my picture of the event too blurred to provide any evidence.

May1, 2000
Police charge – but I missed a picture of a photographer close to me being hit by a baton

Looking back, it was the wrong decision, and certainly when the police charged I should have followed them rather than deciding it was time to go home rather than risk being detained by the police for several hours. Now I think I would react differently – and certainly now being an union member with a press card and an emergency support number helps a little. But I’m still a cautious (or sometimes rather timid) kind of guy.

So although I’ve been to Notting Hill Carnival for around 20 years I’ve never photographed any violence there. For me it’s a great event with hundreds of thousands of people enjoying themselves, while the press coverage this year gave almost as much attention to the 40 youths who had a minor rampage and threw bottles at the police on Ladbroke Grove as to the three-quarters of a million who danced along there earlier. (In the coverage from Sky on at the Times it is hard to see any rioters at all, though the streets are full of police.)

By 5pm I’d been photographing carnival for five hours and felt it was enough. All my pictures are about carnival and not about a violent few, and deliberately so, and I certainly left with a feeling that things might get at least rather lively later. I missed the violence because as always I went home long before it started as darkness fell.

Ladbroke Grove
On Ladbroke Grove where the incidents occurred several hours  later

One of my friends was still there later taking pictures (probably including some of those that made the papers), but I prefer the film coverage, at least for the actual scenes it shows from the street, where the viewer can get a better idea of the extent of the problem and make their own judgements.  Still photography can sometimes catch a moment that has a particular intensity or that somehow represents a situation or an event, but if anyone did that here I’ve yet to see it.  And even with cameras like the Nikon D3, video still seems to have an advantage in very low light, perhaps because sharpness is far less important in moving images.

One thing I find surprising is the apparent slowness of the police to respond to the youths, who they say were making trouble for two hours. There were after all reported to be 40 youths and 11,000 police, including a number with riot shields and the full gear – including, according to my photographer friend, tazers which were used on some of the youths, although this gets no mention in the press coverage I’ve seen.

There was a sickening predictability to the coverage of the event by some of our newspapers. Ridiculous comparisons made to the Notting Hill riots of 1958 when white racist thugs threw petrol bombs into the homes of black families, or the 1976 battle when the 3000 police on duty decided to close down carnival and were repulsed by those taking part.  (Thanks to the web you can now access material published in 1976 by the Times  (see Times Archive box at left, some way down the page, the BBC and others.)

Others used the small disturbances as a pretext to call for an end (or at least an emasculation) of carnival, something the police and some administrators have long wanted – with calls in 1976 by the then Commissioner of the Met, Sir Robert Mark,called for the event to be held in a stadium. Although carnival over the years I’ve been going has become in some ways more restrained and ordered, it is still a long way from that kind of sanitised display, with crowds behind barriers rather than taking part.

You can see my pictures of the carnival from Notting Hill on My London Diary.

Free Hackney Carry On Protest Torch

As billions around the world were being fed images of the Olympic Flag passing from the Mayor of Beijing to our local glove muppet (it’s just so embarrassing to be emborised) in another important ceremony more or less totally unobserved by the commercial media, the Olympic baton of protest was passed from the Free Tibet movement to the Free Hackney campaign.

To mark the transfer, rather than eight minutes of puke-inducing performance that made me sad to be English, the Free Hackney campaign brought their ‘tank’ to the ‘street party’ in Hoxton St that celebrated our considerably more sensible approach to the 1948 event.  Perhaps because of the lack of money it was probably the last Olympics to have any real connection with the spirit of the modern Olympic movement, celebrated in the words of its founder, Baron Pierre de Coubertin: “L’important n’est pas de gagner, mais de participer.” Tell anyone remotely connected with Team Britain or the rest of our sports industry that what is important isn’t winning but taking part and they will look on you as a lunatic.

The ‘tank’ – some kind of small and lightly armoured personnel carrier – was manned and womanned by some familiar faces from earlier ‘Space Hijackers‘ events, including a tank commander I last saw in charge of a rather larger ‘tank’ being auctioned at (or rather just outside) thanks to over-keen co-operation between police and the arms traffickers, at the  the East London Arms Fair at Canning Town’s EXCEL centre.

The vehicle carried several ‘Free Hackney‘ flags which have a familiar yellow, blue and red sun motif, as well as a considerably more meaningful adaptation of the Olympic logo.

As ‘Free Hackney’ point out, London 2012 presents  a great opportunity for property developers to rip us off and make obscene profits building luxury flats in the area, while at the same time restricting public access, closing down the existing free facilities and demolishing social housing and local businesses.

Next to the tank the ‘austerity Olympics’ were taking place on a small section of Hoxton St, with events such as a slow walking race creating considerable hilarity. Unfortunately the event in 2012 promises to be rather more painful.

(Based on a story posted by me to Indymedia on 24 Aug.)

Olympic Gold for Brompton

The one bright spot in the otherwise intensely puerile 8 minutes of the London presentation for the Olympic closing ceremony was the appearance of a Brompton.

Hackney Handover - Brompton
Hackney Handover- Brompton at extreme right.

I suppose it’s too much to hope that this quirky and clever British invention – and probably now the only vehicle of any kind designed and manufactured in England – should be made the official vehicle of London 2012. Because that might suggest that these would at have some pretension to being a green Olympics, an impression the organisers have so far gone to some lengths to avoid by removing the Manor Gardens ‘Olympic’ allotments from the site.

The Brompton became quickly one of my favourite photographic accessories when I bought one at the end of 2002. You can take it on trains, on the underground, get off, unfold it in 15 seconds and ride it away. The front bag is a good place to carry cameras, and you can stop anywhere to take pictures, unlike a car where by the time you have found a place to park you may face a long walk to the location – or have missed the chance of a picture.

It’s also handy when parked against a fence or wall, adding up to a couple of feet to your height to see over obstacles – one foot on the saddle and one on the handlebars for maximum lift, enabling you to climb up easily on walls and look over fences. It’s almost like having a short step-ladder with you.

If necessary you can walk with it, and it carries your kit like a trolley. You can climb up footbridges with it on your shoulder, set it down and ride away and it can also take you reasonable distances at a decent speed. It’s not a good off-road choice, but on a decent surface can travel at a good pace, and I’ve often covered 20 or 30 miles, occasionally more.

But its real forte is rush-hour traffic, when I’ve made journeys across London in minutes that would have taken at least twice as long in car or taxi or by underground. With a Brompton, London seems much smaller – even if, like me, you usually stop at red traffic lights and keep to the correct direction on one-way streets – and its short wheelbase makes weaving in and out of cars held up in traffic easy.

It’s only real down-side is that it’s a powerful magnet for thieves, with a high second-hand value getting quick sales at on-line auction sites and on dodgy market stalls.  Forget D-locks, heavy chains, it’s never safe to leave it locked- you just have to take it everywhere with you, which can occasionally be a problem even though it folds pretty small.

Prison Justice – Paula Campbell

Prison Justice Day, August 10, started in Canada in the 1970s.  On August 10, 1974, Eddie Nalon bled to death in solitary confinement, and on that day a year later prisoner in the jail held a one-day hunger strike and a memorial service – and were themselves put in solitary for doing so. By August 10, 1976, there were two deaths being remembered by the prisoners, and thousands of prisoners in jails across Canada took part in a hunger strike, with Prison Justice Day Committees in Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia organising events in the outside community.

In 1983, prisoners in France joined in, calling for the day to be an international event and by the mid 1990s those in Germany, England and the US were also involved. You can read the details of the history on the Prison Justice web site.

In this country, one of the best known campaigners for justice in our prisons was Pauline Campbell. After the death of her daughter in Styal Prison in 2003, she put all her considerable energy and organisational skills into a constant campaign against deaths in prison. I first met her later that year in Trafalgar Square at the annual United Friends and Family Campaign Remembrance demonstration, where her story moved me to tears.


Pauline Campbell speaking  in 2003

I photographed her on several occasions after that and got to know her rather better this January at a protest outside Holloway jail in London, in memory of Jaime Pearce, a 24 year old who died there the previous month, aged 24, the eighth woman to die in jail in 2007. From then on – like many journalists – I received regular emails from her about her protests, as well as frequent personal messages about my own work.

Pauline assaulted
Pauline Campbell assaulted by a police officer outside Holloway, Jan 2008

Like others who knew her I was deeply shocked (but not surprised) at the news of her suicide at her daughter’s graveside in May this year. So I was sorry to miss the demonstration for Prisoner Justice Day organised by the group No More Prison outside HMP Styal on August 10 to show solidarity with women in prison and pay tribute to Pauline Campbell, who we remember as a fearless campaigner and a remarkable person.