Under siege: Islam, war and the media

 Rt Click, View image to see larger
Troops out of Iraq march, London , October 2004

One of the events I’ll miss because I’m in Paris is ‘Under Seige: Islam, war and the media’, a half-day conference organised by Media Workers Against the War at the London School of Economics on Saturday Nov 15 , with registration from 1.15pm for a 2pm start and the event ending at 6.30pm. You can find fuller details on line and can even book your ticket through a secure booking system.

Among those who have agreed to take part in plenary sessions and workshops are photographers Guy Smallman and Marc Vallée,  journalists and writers including Peter Oborne, Nick Davies, Uzma Hussain, Roshan Salih, Explo Nani-Kofi and Eamonn McCann.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
‘Close Guantanamo’ – Amnesty International protest at US Embassy in London, Jan 2007

Three people very much involved with Guantanamo Bay are campaigning solicitor Louise Christian, former prisoner Moazzam Begg and author of the Guantanamo Files, Andy Worthington. Others include Inayat Bunglawala of the Muslim Council of Britain, Lyndsey German of Stop the War, Jeremy Dear, General SSecretary of the NUJ and Mark Almond, lecturer in modern history at Oriel College Oxford.

The conference aims to  “examine what media workers and students can do to improve coverage of the “war on terror”, to bring critical views into the mainstream, raise the profile of the anti-war movement, and create our own sources of critical news and comment.”

Another Worrying ‘Terrorism’ Story

Popular newspapers in the UK have all covered the story of a 15 year old schoolboy using his mobile phone to photograph Wimbledon station was stopped and searched by three police community support officers. They claimed to be doing so under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act, although they do not appear to have had the supervision of a constable that this requires, nor is it clear that the authorisation was in force that would enable it to be done.

But, apart from being an abuse of law, what the PCSOs did was simply incredibly stupid.  But also part of a concerted anti-photographer culture being promoted by police and Home Office through poster campaigns and press releases.

Marc Vallée’s blog has a number of posts related to this and has recently posted Terror Law and Photography about Clause 75 of the new Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008, which will create a new offence which may well cover photographing or publishing a photograph of any policeman (or members of the armed forces or intelligence services), with draconian sentences.

The Bill does include the statement:
It is a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section to prove that they had a reasonable excuse for their action,  although I’m not at all sure what the courts might consider a reasonable excuse.


Could pictures like these put me in jail?

Marc’s post also mentions that the Home Office is about to post new operational guidance to police about using their stop and search powers, and quotes the draft as clarifying that the police have no powers to stop people taking photographs in authorised areas under Section 44, but if they “reasonably suspect that photographs are being taken as part of hostile terrorist reconnaissance” they may search the person and possibly make an arrest, when they can seize cameras, films and cards as evidence (though they must not destroy or delete images.)

The Wimbledon schoolboy is yet another example of how the police (and PCSOs)  misuse existing law. Giving them further powers can only make things worse.  The future of photography on our streets looks increasingly bleak.

US Election Special

In my inbox this morning was a message from Ricken Patel and the team at Avaaz.org, “a community of global citizens who take action on the major issues facing the world today.” In it they reminded us of some of Obama’s election pledges, and here is their list, with some related images from the streets of London:

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Campaign against Climate Change Kyoto Climate March, London, 12 Feb, 2005

  • Reduce the US’s carbon emissions 80% by 2050 and play a strong positive role in negotiating a binding global treaty to replace the expiring Kyoto Protocol


Stop the War march, London. Sat 15 March, 2008

  • Withdraw all combat troops from Iraq within 16 months and keep no permanent bases in the country


Approaching Aldermaston, April 2004

  • Establish a clear goal of eliminating all nuclear weapons across the globe

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Amnesty International at US Embassy, London mark 6 years of Guantanamo shame, Jam 2008

  • Close the Guantanamo Bay detention center
  • Double US aid to cut extreme poverty in half by 2015 and accelerate the fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculoses and Malaria

Rt Click, View image to see larger

  • Open diplomatic talks with countries like Iran and Syria, to pursue peaceful resolution of tensions
  • De-politicize military intelligence to avoid ever repeating the kind of manipulation that led the US into Iraq

Time running out for Darfur

  • Launch a major diplomatic effort to stop the killings in Darfur
  • Only negotiate new trade agreements that contain labor and environmental protections
  • Invest $150 billion over ten years to support renewable energy and get 1 million plug-in electric cars on the road by 2015

Obama provides a welcome new chance for the USA; perhaps the world’s last fragile hope of avoiding global disaster.

Justice for Asbestos Victims

Some events (even when you are at the right place at the right time) are difficult to photograph because visually they are not very exiting of different. It doesn’t help when the issues involved are complex so that it is not easy to decide on a point of view to take.

The ‘Justice for Asbestos Victims‘ rally was organised by trade unions representing people who had worked with asbestos.  As we all know, asbestos is dangerous stuff, exposure to it killing many workers, and it is also clear that many employers have been negligent and failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent people working for them being exposed to its dangers.

The demonstration was over a decision by the Law Lords that compensation should not be awarded for pleural plaques,  a form of irreversible lung damage caused by exposure to asbestos, because in themselves these do not normally materially affect people’s physical health.  People with them are however likely to develop more serious, often fatal conditions – for which damages are awarded. I think the employers should be liable for their negligence in exposing workers and that the pleural plaques provide clear evidence that this has occurred.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

Several other photographers present were working for the unions concerned who would probably be happy  with some fairly tedious group pictures showing workers and MPs and a few banners – and they proceeded to set these up.  It all helps to make a living, but I wanted to find something more, and don’t really think I managed it.  The picture I took at the International Workers Memorial Day march in April 2006 was considerably stronger – but then its message was clearer too.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Asbestos kills

Justice for Deaths in Custody

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Family and friends call for justice for Sean Rigg, who died in Brixton Police Station this August

Being in police custody or prison should really be the safest possible of situations, but unfortunately as the over 2500 names on the list carried in Saturday’s demonstration by the United Families and Friends of those who have died in custody shows this isn’t the case.  It isn’t even easy to get the figures and the names, and even this long list covering the years since 1969 is far from complete.  Last year there were 182 known deaths – and at that rate the list would be three times as long.

The police, the prisons, secure psychiatric units, immigration detention centres all have a duty of care for the people in them, but it a duty in which they too often fail.  Some of those 182 will be people known to be likely to commit suicide who were not adequately supervised, others those who were restrained in a manner that caused their death.

One of the names on the long list was a young Brazilian man who took a bus to Stockwell station and walked through the barriers and down the escalator. He didn’t know that his perfectly innocent and ordinary movements were being followed by a surveillance team, even though they were very close to him as he entered the station.

While I was writing my post about this year’s United Families and Friends march, I watched the CCTV footage from the station on that morning, showing nothing untoward until about a a minute after he made his way to the platform, when three armed men jumped over the barriers and rushed down.

Someone had blundered, with the result that these men were sent to gun down an innocent man. The Met’s response was to try to cover up in various ways for the mistake, and even at the inquest they are still clearly doing so.  The order that was given was clearly a gross error which should have led to the immediate dismissal and almost certainly criminal charges against the senior officer concerned, but it also highlights a ‘shoot to kill’ policy that I think has no place in a civilised society. It remains to be seen what the inquest will determine.

When Maria Otonia de Menezes came to lay flowers at the gates of Downing St, I was there with others photographing and filming. Earlier, along with other photographers I’d been asked to give the family a little space as they were finding it difficult, and I’d immediately stopped taking pictures and turned away to photograph other things, although some others took no notice of the request. But when it came to the actual pacing of the bouquets and photographs my job was to show the grief and anger of the de Menezes family and others whose sons, brothers, fathers had died to the best of my ability.  At times I found it hard to keep taking pictures, but that after all was what I was there for, and I owed it to these people to do it as well as I could.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

More pictures and text about the demonstration on My London Diary

Guy in Hospital

Not an early Nov 5th story, but a kind of follow-up to my recent post Police attack Photographers where I mentioned that a photographer was attacked by a police dog.

On photographer Marc Vallee’s blog, in the post Guy Smallman in Afghanistan, you can read about another incident in which the same photographer was injured. I’m not quite sure why, but the words that Oscar Wilde put into Lady Bracknell’s mouth about losing parents came into my mind.  Guy certainly has suffered misfortune, but I think it is more a matter of working in dangerous places rather than carelessness.  And being rather cautious, as I tend to be (unkind people might call it timid) is seldom the best way to get good pictures. (You can see more of the Swiss incident in which he was injured on PigBrother.)

Elsewhere on Marc’s blog you can read a lot more about the problems that photographers have with police harassment. On Tuesday he was in the committee room when NUJ Gen Secretary was giving evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights and he gives this link to the long video of some of the proceedings. As he says, parts of it make interesting viewing, though there is a lot best fast-forwarded.

Here in London, the police appear to have been easing off recently, especially over the SOCPA restrictions on demonstration.  On October 11, ‘People in Common‘ and others, including FitWatch, staged a Freedom not fear 2008 event outside New Scotland Yard, although a smiling officer handed out the usual maps and warning, it seemed clear that while reminding people of the law they had no real intention of enforcing it.

Rt Click, View image to see larger in Firefox
A warning that eating in the SOCPA  zone could be an offence

But perhaps the strangest thing about the demonstration was the little person I photographed trapped inside the hood of a large black suit

Rt Click, View image to see larger in Firefox
See the detail view below:
detail

More about that demonstration – and more pictures on My London Diary.

Cheney & Iraqi Oil at Shell UK

It’s good when someone actually comes up with a visual idea for a demonstration that you can photograph; too often you really get things that would only look good from a helicopter. Actually it’s usually better if people don’t try to be too clever, but give us something a little out of the ordinary in the way of masks or makeup or costumes or props that we can play around with and find a different way to photograph.

Firefox: Rt click and 'View Image' to see it larger
Dick Cheney, Iraqi Oil and the Shell Centre (right)

So although a giant Dick Chaney was a nice idea, and he was very well produced, and we all had some fun photographing him, I have a feeling that every other photographer there will have produced a picture more or less like mine. But perhaps not quite.

100 Days to stop Bush & Cheney’s Iraq Oil Grab! was of course a protest about a very serious issue, basically the pay-off US and UK forces were sent to Iraq to bring home. Forget WMD, Iraq was about another three letters, OIL, and Cheney with his friends at Shell and BP are now getting down to wrapping it up and bringing the swag home.

It’s a simple plan. A nationalised oil industry belonging to the Iraqi people (even if much of the proceeds went into palaces for the president) does nothing for multinational oil companies. So you invade, topple Saddam, put a puppet government in his place and send them your “oil experts” to draft natural resources laws that hand out the oil to your friends. 

I photographed the demonstration outside Shell’s UK Offices in Waterloo, before it set off for the BP offices and then the US Embassy at Grosvenor Square. There is some opposition to the proposed handover in the Iraqi Parliament – and rather more among the Iraqi people. If the give-away goes ahead I think we can forecast further trouble in the Middle East after US forces finally pull out.

Lords Fail Chagos Islanders

I wrote briefly about the disturbing case of the Chagos Islanders in May 2007, having met them at the May Day March in London. They were turfed off their homeland in the late 1960s by the Wilson government so we could give the US the island of Diego Garcia to build a huge military base. (The picture of them is in the middle of this page if you don’t want to look at the rest of the pictures from May Day.)

Rt Click, View image to see larger

Earlier this year they were picketing the House of Lords where an appeal was being heard on their case. Our Labour government, having lost over the fundamental justice of their case, and lost an appeal in the High Court, had decided to take the matter to the final stage possible in this country, appealing to the House of Lords.

Today’s judgement, reported on the BBC web site, appears to be a matter of politics and pragmatism rather than justice.

It’s hard not to agree with John Pilger, quoted by the BBC, who described it as a political decision which upheld an “immoral and illegal” act. The case seems likely to go to the European Court of Human Rights, where perhaps justice will prevail over politics.

Italy’s Ethnic Cleansing

Rt Click, View image to see larger

The problems facing the Roma in Italy were highlighted in July this year when media published pictures of holiday makers sunbathing on a beach near Naples ignoring the bodies of two drowned Roma teenagers.

In May 2008, the right-wing Italian government led by Berlusconi introduced a whole range of repressive measures to deal with what they describe as the “gypsy problem“. The measures remind many of the fascist policies under Mussolini – when Italian Roma were stripped of their citizenship and many died in concentration camps. They include dismantling all Roma camps and fingerprinting all Roma – children as well as adults.  Almost all of the Roma are actually Italian citizens. There have since been more or less daily reports of arrests, evictions and other attacks on the community, both by police and by criminals inspired by the government campaign.

Several camps have been burnt to the ground after Molotov cocktails where thrown into them, and many Roma have been left homeless. Forcible evictions from the camps by police have started and many Roma have been arrested.

There are around 150,000 Roma in Italy, less than 0.3% of the Italian population – a lower proportion than in many other European countries. Most of them live in desperately poor conditions in squatted camps around major cities.

Sentiment against Roma has also been hardened by the Italian population’s confusion between them and the mostly non-Roma Romanian migrants who continue to arrrive in Italy and the Roma are scape-goated for crimes committed by these often desperate Romanian refugees – another problem the rigth-wing government has exacerbated rather than attempting to solve.

Around 20 people, many of them Roma, met at the gates of the Italian Embassy in London at Friday lunchtime (17 Oct) to protest against the human rights abuses in Italy which constitute ethnic cleanisng of the Roma. A deputation of four, including Peter Mercer, MBE, the Chair of the National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups were allowed into the Embassy to give their views.

Catherine Beard of the UK Association of Gypsy Women and European Forum delegate had brought back a distinctive ‘Against Ethnic Profiling‘ t-shirt from Europe.

Rt Click, View image to see larger

After the vigil outside the embassy, a number of the protesters went on to a meeting at the House of Lords.

A few more pictures from the event on My London Diary.

Police attack Photographers

I wasn’t feeling too well last Wednesday and didn’t feel up to going to Brighton to photograph the Shut ITT! demonstration there, a follow-up to Smash EDO’s ‘Carnival Against the Arms Trade‘ which I photographed last June. Had I made it his time there seems to have been a pretty good chance I would have ended the day with at least minor injuries from police action.

Rt Click, View image to see larger
Police use batons on demonstrators outside EDO in June 2008

In June the policing had got pretty heavy-handed, and apparently even more so after I had left early thinking the demonstration was more or less over, when for some unaccountable reason the protesters were actually let on to the factory site and there was considerable mayhem all round.

This time things were tougher still, and not just for the protesters but also for photographers. On his blog,  Jason Parkinson writes  about the police actions:  “I am sick to death of seeing my work colleagues getting hurt while trying to do their job” and talks about “a continuous pattern of abuse, ignorance, intimidation, harassment, surveillance and violence” directed at journalists, particularly photographers and videographers who need to be very much in the thick of things to get their pictures.

Two other photographers, Marc Vallée and Jonathan Warren have described how they were filmed and questioned before the start of the event, and told they were not allowed to photograph in the area where protesters were arriving.

Later, Vallée was assaulted by police (again!) and another photographer was bitten when a police dog was set on him, requiring medical attention. At least one photographer was pepper sprayed.

In my camera bag I carry a copy of the Guidelines for reporters, photographers and news crews for dealing with police at incidents published by the BPPA, CIoJ and NUJ in association with the Metropolitan Police, which on their reverse carry the Met’s guidelines for officers. As it states, these guidelines “have been agreed at senior levels by all parties.  Please use them in a spirit of mutual professional respect to resolve any problems.”

These guidelines were adopted by all police forces in Britain in April 2007. They lay down general principles that recognise the law, the duty of the media to report from the scene of incidents, and the police duty to help them in doing so where possible.

These guidelines are simply not being followed so far as the policing of protests is concerned. As Jason ends his blog post:  “There is no excuse to baton a photographer, no excuse to pepper spray a photographer and absolutely no excuse to use a dog as an offensive weapon against a photographer.” This isn’t my idea of “mutual professional respect.”