Yemen?

I was pretty ignorant about Yemen. Until last Saturday I’m not sure I would have pointed it out absolutely correctly on a globe, though I knew it was somewhere in Arabia.  In my younger years, Aden featured regularly on the news, mainly as somewhere where British soldiers were shot at. Aden was the centre of something called a protectorate, which I think meant that while we had colonized the city itself, we’d been happy to support a whole hotchpotch of local rulers in the area around it, so long as they mostly played ball with us.

After it got independence in 1967, South Yemen became a socialist republic, receiving support and in particular arms for Russia. North Yemen was an Arab Kingdom (once under Turkish rule)   and later a republic, and the two countries soon decided in principle on merging to form a single state of Yemen, though it wasn’t until 1990 that this finally happened.

Four years later, may of those in the south were fed up with the union – they  didn’t seem to be getting  much out of it while people from the north were getting jobs and taking over land in the south.  Southerners rose up and began a civil war in 1994, aiming to leave the union and were soon defeated.

© 2009 Peter Marshall

Why I needed a crash course in the history of the Yemen was because there were around a hundred supporters of South Yemen demonstrating opposite Downing Street on Saturday afternoon. Most of their placards were in Arabic, and they didn’t have a press release- or at least not in English. Perhaps the event was meant more for the Aden TV crew who were there than a British audience.

More about the event, the history of the Yemen, some rather gloomy prognostications and some pictures on My London Diary. It’s not enough for me to take pictures, I need to try and put the events I photograph into some kind of political perspective.

March for Jobs

My first destination on Saturday was Highbury and Islington, and I took the precaution of consulting the Transport for London web site to find whether the Victoria Line was working, and it told me it was fine. So I got off the fast(er) train to Waterloo at Clapham Junction (You can’t really call it a fast service when Southwest Trains have increased the timetabled time to get there by 5 minutes over those when I first started travelling from here in the 1970s  – to avoid any fines for running late.

One of the many things that has completely disillusioned me about New Labour was its failure to take control of the railways when we voted it back into power in 1997. Privatisation had so obviously failed that there was no sensible alternative but reverting to a nationalised system – and with the chance to set it up on a much improved basis. But instead they made it worse. Now we have trains that close their doors half a minute before the timetabled time – if they want to run a train at 9.58.5 they should call it the 9.58.5 service, not the 9.59.  We have services that take 35 minutes to Waterloo rather than 29 0r 30 minutes. And we have fares that have increased considerably more than inflation. That’s the legacy of privatisation.

There are of course a few improvements. The trains are quieter and smother running. They are non-smoking throughout. What’s really annoying is that they actually have greater acceleration and higher maximum speeds – so really we should be seeing services that are faster rather than slower. Occasionally when engineering works re-route mainline services by our route we get speeds that show what modern trains can do on our route, cutting times from the now normal 35 to around 20 minutes.

I only have to wait 5 minutes for the even slower service that stops at Vauxhall, and walk briskly down to the Underground, where I find no service. It wasn’t TfL’s fault, as a passenger has jumped in front of a train at Stockwell. But given modern communications I think we could have expected to be told this before getting off the train at Vauxhall.

The fastest way to proceed is to go back into Vauxhall station (its claim to fame is that it provided the Russian word for station) and get on the next service to Waterloo, arriving there around 15 minutes later than if I’d stayed on my original train.

Fortunately the parts of the underground I need are working, though as usual at weekends several lines are suffering from closure. It’s a slightly slower journey than usual from having to change at Piccadilly Circus, and the Victoria Line, still running from Victoria only, has some large gaps and it’s around ten minutes before my train arrives.

Logistics  – working out how to be at places at the right time – is very important in the kind of photography I do, often covering several events in different parts of London over a day.  Fortunately, although the March to Defend Jobs, Services and Education was timed for 11.00, this was the time to start gathering, and the  march doesn’t actually get started until around 11.40, so despite the travel problems I actually arrive well in time.

As a photographer in London, you need to allow plenty of time for snarl ups and other problems. Driving is frankly pretty hopeless for getting around quickly, not least because of parking problems. The most reliable way to travel is a bike, either motor or leg-powered, and for longer distances you need to rely on underground or overground trains. One of my most useful photo accessories is a folding bike, which can be taken on trains at any time, but it gets in the way when covering demonstrations and marches.

For this march, which goes from Highbury Fields to Archway, I do rather wish I had brought the Brompton, as it’s a bit further than I remembered. But I know it would get in the way later in the day.

It’s hard to photograph events such as this. There just isn’t a great deal of visual interest, and it involved no real celebrities.  The trade union banners are colourful, but essentially two-dimensional.  It’s really hard work to get much out of it, but there are a few pictures I’m pleased with.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

This was my favourite, taken with the 20mm f2.8 Nikon lens on the full-frame D700 from a low angle and including a placard that says what the event is about as well as one of the more colourful union banners from the PCS.  The expressions of the two main figures , shouting a slogan, also helps, and there are a number of strong lines all in the same direction – just off of vertical that give it a strong dynamic feel. Working at ISO 400 gave an exposure of 1/640 at f10,  freezing the movement at giving depth of field that extends from the hand close to camera in the bottom centre to the top of the banner and the buildings in the background.

In the old days, I would have been shooting at a pre-set aperture and using ‘zone focus’ to give me a  good idea of the depth of field I would get. Nowadays I’m increasingly relying on ‘Auto-area AF’ which claims to distinguish people from background, along with continous servo autofocus – the C setting. Exposure was also automatic, using matrix mode, and its coped well with the bright area of sky. Usually – as in this case – I’m impressed by what modern auto systems can do. I could have done it as well manually, but not in the fraction of a second I had to take this picture.

I left before the rally had finished – by then it was running considerably late – and again was thankful I’d come by public transport, as I could just walk the short distance to Archway tube rather than having to go back to the starting point.

Many more pictures on My London Diary.

Can Anyone Apply for an NUJ Card who has a Camera ?

Oh no, Commander Broadhurst, no, no, NO, NO!

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

Some advice for any high-ranking police officer. If you come to a conference of 200 press photographers, don’t say things like “I don’t know whether, or what vetting system there is for holding an NUJ card, can anybody apply for an NUJ card who has a camera?” And it isn’t really sensible to talk about a  “phalanx of cameras” getting in the way of police either or make too much of expressing support for the actions of front line officers to people who have been assaulted by them. When someone gets up and describes how an officer in riot gear shouted at him “I don’t care if you’re press” and then broke the arm holding up a press card with a baton blow, or how another photographer wearing a protective helmet was hit so badly that he suffered from concussion for two days, that isn’t helpful.

The card we use is not an NUJ card, but a UK Press Card, issued by the NUJ and other bodies on behalf of the UK Press Card Authority and states “The Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland recognise the holder of this card as a bone fide newsgatherer.” But apparently neither the man in charge of public order for the Metropolitan Police nor the officers on the front line do.

It isn’t easy to get a press card from the NUJ – you have to provide evidence that you work in public places and so have a need for the card, and that 50% or more of your income comes from journalism for NUJ membership.

Two hundred of us there all tried to tell him – and he had to abandon his presentation to the NUJ ‘Photography Matters‘ conference at that point and sit and listen and try to respond to complaint after complaint about police behaviour.

© 2009 Peter Marshall
Press photographers were told to leave or be put in the cells…

Notable among these was the use of the Public Order Act to compel a group of around 20 press photographers to leave the Royal Exchange area on May 2.  An officer came up to them as they were standing behind a police cordon, and addressing them starting with the words “Ladies and Gentlemen of the press…” informed them that unless they left the area for half an hour they would spend the rest of the day in a police cell. Why? Because the police were about to set police dogs loose on the demonstrators.

This wasn’t the only session of the conference, and others,  if less important were more informative or entertaining. Penny Tweedie presented a retrospective view of her career, starting from when the NUJ stopped her getting a staff job in Fleet Street because she was a woman and couldn’t possibly cope with being the only photographer present on a night shift if anything stressful happened. You can read a little more about the other sessions that I was able to attend on My London Diary, where there are also more pictures from the day. All were taken with a 20mm lens (one is severely cropped) as when I put my hand in the bag for a longer lens I found it wasn’t there. It was an early start for me and in my rush to get the train I’d not packed it. It’s a nice lens, but some shots would be easier with something a little longer.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

During the lunch break we all had an opportunity to look at the 2009 Photography Matters exhibition, with 50 pictures from 35 photographers – and I was very pleased that two of my pictures made the show, including a rather nice picture made with the 12mm Sigma (on the D300 – so 18mm equivalent) of a ring of police around a few demonstrators at City Hall on the night the London mayoral election was announced.

© 2008 Peter Marshall

I took this picture with a policeman pushing my shoulder, telling me I had to leave the area. It was hard to see any particular reason for this, but I knew there was no point in arguing – and that to do so could lead to my arrest. Fortunately I managed to hang on long enough to change the lens and get the image.

More From Outer Surburbia

The second of my incursions into outer surburbia last Saturday was to Walton on the Hill, part of the Surrey pony belt around the southern fringes of London. Like Pratt’s Bottom its a  area with a village settlement pattern set in green belt aspic, now populated by SUV man and of woman) a curiously rural commuter enclave between M25 and the rows of houses of suburbia proper.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

Of course I’m sure its a very pleasant place to live, where cricket, warm beer and the Festival of Britain atmosphere still thrive, but it does gives me a strong feeling of déjà vu, or perhaps more appropriately déjà vécu. Outer suburbia isn’t outer space or even Outer Mongolia, but that drive around the M25 does seem somehow to slip into a parallel universe where at least in some respects time has just not passed as it has elsewhere.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

The name of the event, a May Pageant, certainly has a ‘New Elizabethan‘ resonance, although perhaps surprisingly the event dates from the late 60s rather than the mid 50s.  But truly I don’t mean to knock it. The event shows a real spirit of community that has been largely lost in our cities, and an emphasis on the local that is perhaps something that will be needed if we are to have a sustainable future.

This year I photographed the procession to the fairground and then retired to the rather pleasant pub from where it starts,  but in May 2007 I made a rather more inclusive record, from the start:

© 2007 Peter Marshall

through the whole of the May Queen crowning there

© 2007 Peter Marshall

and the whole of the fun of the fair, including maypole and belly dancing, pig and balloon races, fights between choirboys and sumo wrestlers,  Wild West Shoot-outs, Red Riding Hood and the wolves.

© 2007 Peter Marshall

Nigerian Good Neighbour Wins Case

On 6 May 2009, Ayodeji Omotade appeared in Brent magistrates court more than fourteen months  after he was forcibly removed from a British Airways flight to Nigeria before it took off from Heathrow.

In an earlier post, Good Neighbour on Trial?, I wrote:

Ayodeji Omatode, an IT consultant living in Kent, boarded a British Airways flight at Heathrow on March 27, 2008, going home to Lagos for his brother’s wedding. Along with other passengers he was appalled at the maltreatment of a Nigerian man being forcibly deported on the flight and he made his views clear.BA employees called the police to deal with Mr Omatode, and more than 20 officers boarded the plane and dragged him off; he was handled roughly, thrown against a wall and then into a police van, arrested and held for eight hours. BA banned him from flying with them, didn’t return his fare and only gave him his luggage back a week later – damaged.

© 2008 Peter Marshall
Protester outside BA’s Waterside HQ near Heathrow

My post came after photographing a demonstration organised by the Respect Nigerians Coalition. They called on BA to apologise and compensate Mr Omatode, to withdraw their allegations and their ban on him flying and improve its attitude to customers and stop practices that make it appear “arrogant, uncaring and discriminatory.” Other UK groups supporting the campaign and call for a boycott of BA flights until these demands were met included the All African Women’s Group and Global Women’s Strike.

Yesterday he was cleared of behaving in a threatening, abusive, insulting or disorderly manner towards the crew, and the district judge decided he had made a “forcible but polite complaint” and that there was no evidence he had been threatening, abusive, insulting or disorderly towards BA staff.

There were nine witnesses called by BA, including their own staff, police, G4 security and immigration officers, but their evidence contradicted each other. Mr Omatode’s defence was  impeded by BA, who refused to make the passenger list available to his defence lawyer, and he was only able to call two witnesses as well as his own testimony. You can read a fuller account in The Guardian.

Mr Omotade commented:

“It has been a horrific experience for me and my family, going through a year of criminal proceedings in which British Airways, the Metropolitan Police, Immigration security officers, and the Crown Prosecution Service constructed a false and malicious case against me.”

and

“The truth has finally prevailed, and I have been completely vindicated.  I spoke out as I expect anyone would do.  I paid a price because I could not look the other way. I am in the process of putting my life together again.  Justice has been served.  I have been delivered from the claws of British Airways corporate tyranny.”

It was indeed an expensive case for him, as he was refused legal aid, and although the Nigerian High Commission had promised to help they failed to do so.

Mr Omotade is demanding an apology and full compensation for his coast and the brutal treatment he recieved and for his family in Nigeria who had to buy clothes and wedding rings to replace those he was bringing out with him from England.  He also wants to know from the immigration authorities what happened to the man who was being deported.

A BA spokesman stated that they had a legal obligation to carry deportees and therefore any call for an apology should be directed to the police and CPS. Since it was their staff who called for the removal of Mr Omotade and later persisted with the false allegations and ban this appears a ridiculous position.

More pictures from last year’s demo outside BA’s Waterside HQ on My London Diary.

Strangers Into Citizens

 © 2009 Peter Marshall.

A packed Trafalgar Square all waving Union Jacks and singing ‘God Save the Queen’ is not my idea of a demonstration, and I turned to the photographer next to me and suggested we compete with a rendition of the ‘Internationale‘ (which later he told me he had as a ringtone.) But ‘Strangers into Citizens‘ is not a typical demonstration and most of the tens of thousands there had started the event in one of seven crowded religious services around the capital, though I’d passed on that and joined the several thousand mainly Latin Americans halfway through their march from the Elephant outside Lambeth North tube.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

Perhaps 90% of the crowd filling the square were migrants (or the children of migrants) with representatives from almost every country around the world. Although the march had been lively, the rally was a little turgid at times, with speaker after speaker representing so many different interests – religions, political parties, trades unions, ethnic groups and more – who have all backed this initiative. But it ended with quite a bang, a short but fiery set from Asian Dub Foundation, Bangladeshi drummers and some very lively African dancers.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

‘Strangers into Citizens’ is organised by London Citizens, a new type of popular movement for justice for the poor in our society, combining trade unions with churches and other groups and pressing for improvements in pay and conditions for the lowest paid workers – who include many migrants.

Strangers into Citizens calls for a pathway to give long term irregular migrants a right to earn indefinite leave to stay in this country. Current best estimates are that around 725,000 people are currently living in the UK without a documented right to remain.  They include asylum seekers whose cases have not been determined or who have been refused but have not been removed and those who have stayed on after temporary visas or permission to stay has expired.

Many of them are working and paying taxes; some are exploited by employers who take advantage of their status to pay wages below the legal minimum and to avoid making proper insurance contributions. Many could make a much greater contribution to our economy if they were able to make proper use of their qualifications.

Strangers into Citizens propose that those who have been here for more than four years should be elegible for a two-year work permit. At the end of this they should, “subject to criteria such as an English language test, a clean criminal record and valid references from an employer and community sponsor” be granted indefinite leave to remain.

These people are with us, many taking a valuable and active part in the communities in which they live. An amnesty for them makes sense on moral, religious, practical and economic grounds – at current removal rates it would take over 30 years and cost around £8bn to forcibly remove them, and they make a positive contribution to our economy.

© 2006 Peter Marshall

I photographed the rally at which Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor launched Strangers in Citizens three years ago in May 2006, as well as later demonstrations, and it has wide suport from churches as well as Jewish and Muslim organisations and the key NGOs in the area. The campaign, led by ‘London Citizens’ has the support of members in all the main political parties – and people from them spoke at the rally. The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson has also supported it and the Liberal Democrats have adopted it as party policy. Like Green MEP Jean Lambert, one of the speakers at today’s rally, the problem I have with it is that it does not go far enough. Although it might cover 450,000 of those living here without documents, it would still leave some 300,000, many of whom also have a very good case for the regularisation of their position. And although the campaign stresses that this would be a ‘one-off’ amnesty, I see a clear need for a continuing policy to allow those who contribute to the country to attain legal status.

One point made very strongly at the rally was the need to challenge the use of such terms as “illegal immigrant”, a derogatory and inaccurate term used to stigmatise migrant workers and to justify increasingly draconian action against them. People are not illegal, although most of us at times break laws – it is hard not to. Those in this country without proper papers are in general more law-abiding than the rest of the population as it is in their interest not to attract the attention of the authorities. Most want nothing more than to lead a normal life and contribute to the society in which they are living. The French have a rather better term, “sans-papiers”, those without papers, the “undocumented.”

Forced removal of all those without permission to remain – as demanded by the racists –  would be extremely expensive, costing around £8 billion, and with the current resources for enforcement would take over 30 years. Trying to speed it up would be even more expensive. Whatever views people hold on immigration we need a policy that recognises the scale of the situation and takes sensible action. In my view it is also wrong to call it a “problem” – the real problem for us would be if these people were no longer here to do the jobs that nobody else wants to do.

May Day the Stalinist Way

© 2009 Peter Marshall

Hearing on the radio the news of Stalin’s death in 1953 is one of my earliest precisely datable memories.  At the time it was still possible to think of him warmly as ‘Uncle Joe’, whose stand against Hitler had made it possible for us to win the war. Without him history would have been different, and Britain would most likely have suffered a German conquest and occupation.

But of course we now know much more about the ‘Great Terror’, the ruthless purges, the show trials and the estimated 20-30 million who died under his orders. Few of us would now want to march behind his portrait, as a number of groups in the May Day march in London do.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

As well as the usual large groups of Turkish and Kurdish communists, there are also many other groups in the march, headed by a number of trade union banners. It’s a real shame that May Day is not a Bank Holiday, when a rather larger and more representative event might be expected.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
Unusual animation from Tony Benn

The rally in Trafalgar Square is dominated by the trade unions, and many marchers didn’t stay. The final speeches were the most interesting, especially with a very lively Tony Benn who now seems to be getting younger with every public appearance.

One trade unionist missing was Jack Jones,  whose funeral Tony Benn and some of the others had attended earlier in the day.

On the march was a sizeable block of Sri Lankan Tamils who went on to join the continuing demonstration in Parliament Square against the continued assault by government forces on civilians and Tamil Tigers confined in a small area a couple of miles wide.  Considerably unwelcome was another group of Sri Lankans,  the Sinhalese JVP, a party now part of the Sri Lankan government, and whose intervention stopped the government considering a federal solution and led to the all-out attacks on the LTTE.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
The JVP on the March

More about the event and lots of pictures on My London Diary.

No Half Measures

Green campaigners demonstrated opposite Downing St on Thursday 29 April against the Government’s intention to allow the building of new coal-fired power stations with only limited carbon capture.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.
Joss Garman from Greenpeace addresses the demo
Coal is inherently the  ‘dirtiest’ of fuels, releasing large quantities of carbon dioxide on burning. Current carbon capture and storage technologies can cut emissions by around 20%, still leaving a massive pollution.

Our government want to build new coal power stations despite this, promising that in 15 years time unless all the carbon can be captured they will be close. As several speakers, including Green MEP for London Jean Lambert pointed out, it is by no means certain that 100% CCS will be achievable, and almost certain that if it isn’t no government will close down these dirty power stations.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

More on the demonstration on My London Diary.

WMD in London

April 28 is International Workers Memorial Day, recognised in many countries around the world. Consultations are taking place over recognition by the UK government, with construction workers union ICATT pressing for it to be made a Bank Holiday, but at the moment although WMD was observed in various places in the UK it remained rather easy to miss in London.

People do get killed at work. Many if not most are not killed by ‘accident’ but because of a deliberate flouting of safety practices. ‘Accident’ rates are  higher among small firms and sub-contractors, where the financial incentive to ‘cut corners’ is higher.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

The main London demonstration started at the statue of the Unknown Building Worker in the pavement by the south side of the road at Tower Hill. Unless you are catchng a bus there you are unlikely to see it as most pedestrians walk along the underpass and miss it. There were apparently great problems in finding a suitable location for this statue, but it is a shame it isn’t in a rather more prominent place – just a hundred yards or so west near Tower Terrace would be better.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

Most of those taking part in the march and rally were construction workers, many in work clothes and carrying hard hats. Also present were relatives of some of those killed – there are roughly 80 such deaths a year (as well as many more who die from exposure to asbestos.)

Not far away the march stopped for a short period of silence outside a site where a worker was killed in March, before going on to the London offices of the Health and Safety Executive. HSE staff there complain about the number of inspectors being cut – and less inspections being made. There are very few prosecutions brought, and even when these are successful, penalties are often virtually negligible. We need much tougher laws, better enforcement and sensible sentences to improve safety at work.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

You can read a fuller account of the march and rally with more pictures on My London Diary

Visteon Workers Win – But Fight Continues

One of the better pieces of news on May Day was that the occupation and picketing by sacked Visteon workers in Belfast, Enfield and Basildon and the strong support given by their union, Unite, has led to a greatly improved offer on severance pay, which the workers have now voted to accept.

The deal, achieved through the kind of fighting spirit I witnessed on my visits to the plant at Enfield shortly after the factory occupation started and when the workers came out of the works following a court order has been described as “ten times better” than the initial offer, with most workers getting six months or a year’s pay. The campaign also benefited from considerable support by students and trade unionists who brought supplies and joined in the pickets and demonstrations at the plant.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

One of the workers from Enfield gave a powerful address at the Trade Union May Day rally in Trafalgar Square, stressing the need to stand up and fight for your rights – as these men and women did.

However, despite this victory there is still a battle to be fought over pensions, which highlights our unsatisfactory laws governing company pension schemes.  Legislation is needed to ensure that money paid into these by employees and employer should be entirely separate from company accounts and not something that can be lost.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

After the rally in Trafalgar Square, workers and supporters held a picket outside the offices of Visteon administrators KPMG just off Fleet Street (once of course the home of the UK Newspaper industry.)  They demanded that their pension funds be restored to them.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.

There were speeches from several of the workers, including Raymond who had spoken earlier at Trafalgar Square, as well as one of the local Unite officials. The picket was also supported by London anarchists, including members of the London Branch of the IWW (Industrial Workers of the World),  and trade unionists.

© 2009 Peter Marshall.