Let’s Get Shirty

It’s sometimes hard to know what is acceptable and what isn’t in terms of obscenity (and nudity) on the web and in print. I’m seldom if ever myself worried by such things, though the kind of repetitive language I sometimes hear gets rather boring – and nudity isn’t always aesthetically desirable – though what upsets me most is not the human body but the kind of retouching that makes it into something inhuman. Nice to see someone retouching the other way for a change in Celebrities Photoshopped to Look Like Ordinary People by Danny Evans.

But people actually kept their shirts on at the Let’s Get Shirty Over Bedroom Tax protest at the end of March, though some had brought spares with messages to leave with David Cameron. There were a few that were fairly inflammatory and others that were a little rude.

And in those cases where I think it might be a problem for some people I usually try to make sure I have an alternative view, as in this case.

I’m sure we will see many more protests against the Bedroom Tax, as although the amounts involved may seem chicken-feed to the cabinet millionaires that dreamed it up, it looms very large in the budgets of those who will have to pay it. Think of it terms of that man left with £53 a week after his essential bills have been paid – the average £14 a week for a single ‘extra’ bedroom is over 25% of his income.

Politicians think in terms of percentages when it suits them, but not when it doesn’t. It might help them to judge the fairness of their policy to apply a similar percentage cut to the kind of figures that they live on – which would mean someone with an income of £1 million losing around £265,000 of it. But of course, thanks to that nice Mr Osborne, they will actually be getting a little gift of an extra £40,000. We certainly are not all in it together, and I’m pleased to be one of the 467,420 who have signed the petition urging Ian Duncan Smith to prove he could – as I heard him say on Radio 4 – live on £53 a week if he had to.

The anger was clear on the faces of some of the protesters, and I predict it will get worse.

I can’t think of much to say in terms of the photography. I wasn’t feeling at my best, and it was still too cold, and there were too many people trying to take pictures. Particularly too many of the sort who are completely unaware of others taking photographs and who simply walk between you and the people you are photographing, holding a camera or phone out in front of them and seeing nothing but that small screen.

Of course when it gets really crowded there isn’t room for them, and having a very wide lens can let you work when the amateurs can’t.  When things get crowded the 10.5mm really comes into its own, but for some reason I didn’t get round to using it – always a sign with me that I’m not really quite on the ball, even when my best pictures don’t come from it.

The 16-35mm is pretty useful at close-quarters too.

More at Let’s Get Shirty Over Bedroom Tax.

________________________________________________________

My London Diary : Buildings of London : River Lea/Lee Valley : London’s Industrial Heritage

All photographs on this and my other sites, unless otherwise stated are by Peter Marshall and are available for reproduction or can be bought as prints.

To order prints or reproduce images

________________________________________________________

Blood on the Street

No, this isn’t going to be a post about Thatcher or the Miner’s Strike. I’m pleased that I avoided photographing the former – except in effigy – and a little ashamed that I was too busy with other things in other places to cover the latter. But since everything else published today seems to be about her I felt obliged to start with a reference. To me she represented the triumph of the politics of personal greed that has led with a certain inevitability to our current financial sickness and Victorian or worse levels of inequality (but without any of the Victorian virtues), but perhaps even more basically that she managed to stigmatise all ideas of social conscience as the politics of envy. But enough of Thatcher, more than enough. If only it was Thatcherism that was going to its grave.

Of course my politics and my photography are inextricably linked in my life, as I think they have been for virtually all if not all those photographers I admire. Even Ansel Adams, who came to photography through the Sierra Club.

The blood in the title is for ‘blood diamonds’ and around the end of march I was outside Sotheby’s in New Bond St because as well as selling old jewels they also are in business to sell diamonds from the Steinmetz Diamond Group which sponsors the Israeli Givati Brigade which is accused of war crimes in Gaza. Although this and the “about $1 billion (the Israeli diamond industry contributes) annually to the Israeli military and security industries” was the reason for the protest, one of those present who has researched the Israeli diamond industry also told me that Israel exports more cut and polished diamonds (and they are around 30% of its exports) than can be accounted for by its imports of raw stones, and alleged that Israel secretly imports illegal rough diamonds from war-torn countries such as the Congo, and cuts and polishes them so they can then be legally sold, despite being one of the leading players in the ‘Kimberley Process’ against the use of blood diamonds. I was in no position to assess the truth of this claim, so should I report the allegation or not? As you can see in Blood Diamonds at Sotheby’s I did.

Photographically my problem was that there was really little to make interesting pictures. A few people – about a dozen protesters, not all present at the same time were all the protest needed to make its point, and there were a few members of Sotheby’s staff standing in the doorway and occasionally coming out onto the street, and the public walking past, some stopping to read the banners or taking a leaflet. But really rather little to work with, though I tried my best.

Both of the windows at Sotheby’s had a video display, and one was on their sales of antique jewellery, including a image that filled the screen with diamonds. They weren’t the diamonds the protest was about, but it was a good enough background for a photograph. The usual pictures of the protesters and placards and banners. The staff and protesters…

Then came what I saw at the time as a little gift from the photographic gods. A passing cyclist paused to look at the display, stopping his bicycle on a painted bicycle symbol on the street outside the shop, next to one of the protesters. I saw a possibility and moved to take a picture, then saw that another cyclist was walking down the street, and took a second frame just before he walked behind the hand of the protester holding out a leaflet.

It may not be the greatest picture I’ve ever taken, but it was certainly a little less pedestrian (sorry) than the rest! And to continue my thoughts from yesterday, perhaps had just a little touch of Winogrand?

With the Midwives

Long ago, when I became a parent, we did it on the NHS. Linda I think liked the idea of a relatively clean ward with medical services to hand being looked after compared to the mess and confusion of our own home, and didn’t entertain the idea of a home birth. Back then our local hospital was clean, in a newly opened purpose built maternity unit, and seemed well and efficiently run and there appeared to be no shortage of midwives. The hospital and the ante-natal classes were a short bike ride away, though for the birth we travelled by ambulance. It was a long and tricky business and we were pleased there was a doctor to hand when needed.  Linda went back there a couple of years later for our second child.

Now, that unit has long been demolished, and most of our local hospital services have moved away elsewhere. When I had a week or two in a couple of the remaining wards around 10 years ago I was horrified at the failure of the contract cleaners to clean and it was often impossible for patients to find a nurse when one was needed.  But perhaps the replacement maternity unit at the hospital an hour away by public transport is still well run – I’ve had no occasion to visit.

But many mothers want the more personal service that independent midwives can provide, although it is only available through the NHS in a few areas, and in some respects it provides a model that the NHS could and should learn from.  David Cameron probably regrets having called the service they offer a ‘gold standard’ of care, but it is, and one that the NHS should aspire to, but unfortunately often appears to put unnecessary hurdles against cooperating with. But this protest was more about the European Union regulations and the failure of our government as yet to provide an affordable professional indemnity insurance scheme – something private enterprise has failed to come up with for over 10 years.  It doesn’t make a great slogan:

What do we want?
An affordable professional indemnity insurance scheme!
When do we want it?
Now!

but it really is vital for the future mothers of this country.

Photographically the main problem was keeping warm, though I had wrapped up well. Though I think the Nikon D700 and D800E I use are ridiculously large – probably twice the volume of my old OM bodies – you can at least use them wearing pretty thick gloves.

I wanted to avoid the stereotype that using an independent midwife or wanting a home delivery were the prerogative of rather cranky middle-class mothers, but there were quite a few present who perhaps fitted. But one speaker introduced herself as an “ordinary mother”, making it clear that she wasn’t wealthy or middle class, not someone who could normally afford private medical care.  She told of having to scrimp and save and of her good fortune in finding an independent midwife who would take her on at less than the normal rate.

One of the clichés about photojournalists is that their response to human misery is simply to photograph it rather than give help; something that is often untrue, although often the most positive thing photographers can do is to show what is happening to the world through their pictures. But we all know the story about the photographer describing the terrible condition and need of a beggar, near to death on an Indian street. “And what did you give him?” he was asked. “1/125 at f8. ”

I found myself having to make a decision in a rather less critical situation when photographing the large group picture of mothers and children which one of the gentlemen of the press had asked the event organisers to set up. Not my kind of thing, but if it happens I take advantage of it, and I’d moved in close to take pictures of a small group of mothers and children. As I did so one called out to me for help, saying she felt she was about to faint. Fortunately she didn’t hand me the baby that was rather securely strapped to her, but needed me to look after her things while she struggled to release the child.

For a couple of minutes I was no longer a photographer, simply someone giving assistance to a fellow human being. She didn’t faint, and thanked me for my help and I went back to taking pictures. I’d probably missed some opportunities, but it didn’t seem important; I was pleased to be able to help.

More about the event and more pictures in Independent Midwives Need Insurance on My London Diary.

Continue reading With the Midwives

Budget Day March

My last photographs on Budget Day were of an early evening march and rally against austerity and the cuts in public services, with George Osborne confirming the expectations that he would say these needed to continue despite the continuing lack of growth in the economy and the growing evidence that his plan is not working.

It was dusk as people began to gather – though it hadn’t been that bright all day, but it was definitely getting darker, and although I could take pictures at high ISO, as usual flash generally helped. It wasn’t a huge march, but it was quite lively, though it was tricky to catch that in the pictures.

People walking along the road with placards and banners somehow just didn’t get the spirit of the event, and I needed to find something more dynamic, with a group of students who were making rather more noise, even though I wasn’t recording sound.

This is perhaps an image with a suitably ‘bad’ composition and a little chaos that for me gets a little closer to the event, taken with a very wide angle rather close to the woman with the microphone, deliberately pushing her into the corner of my frame – and this is exactly the full frame. I had the flash angled around 45 degrees to the right and have had to do a little dodging and burning as usual to bring the lighting to something rather more even. The shutter speed (1/60s f5 16mm ISO 2500) is slow enough to give a little blur on the hand in the centre of the frame (over the headline message ‘MORE TORY CUTS’) but fortunately the rest of the image is sharp.

I didn’t stay too  long at the rally opposite Downing St, as it was just too cold. There does seem to be rather a lack of street lighting in the area, so again I was mainly working with flash, though I did make a few exposures with available light, such as this:

Also taken at 1/60 second at ISO 2500 at 16mm, this was underexposed by a couple of stops, which Lightroom coped with pretty well, but much of the light was a nasty orange, only partly correctable. I’ve tried to get reasonably sensible skin tones with a colour temperature setting of 3313Km but the placard is noticeably pink.

Flash – as in this picture taken with the DX 18-105mm at its longest – around 158mm equivalent – does give a better and more predictable light – in this case at 5450K.

Continue reading Budget Day March

SOAS Cleaners

Justice for Cleaners!  was the clear message to the management at SOAS from the lunchtime protest by cleaners, staff and students. The School of Oriental and African Studies has a worldwide reputation which ill accords with treating any of the staff who work there as dirt, but that’s how the cleaners feel they are treated. The SOAS management keeps its own hands clean by bringing in a contract cleaning firm to do their dirty work, and cleaners are paid below the level needed to live on in London, and allege they are badly treated by the ISS management.

As well as the London Living Wage they want to have the same kind of provision for pensions, sick pay and holiday pay that SOAS pays other workers on the same site, and for SOAS to take them back under it’s management – ‘in house.’  Two of those who spoke at the rally were from Ecuador, and one of them, I think in that country’s diplomatic service, said that they now had social justice laws in Ecuador that made the kind of ‘outsourcing’ arrangement that SOAS have with ISS illegal. The only way outsourcing ever ‘works’ is by cutting the level of service provided and/or cutting the wages and conditions of the workers.

We saw it clearly when I worked in education and the cleaning was outsourced. Some of the cleaners who had previously worked for our college were transferred to the contractor, but at lower pay and with worse conditions of service. Managers made them cover more rooms, and they no longer had time to do the job properly – with dirt building up in corners and behind furniture they no longer had time to move. Many of the better workers left and were replaced by cheaper labour. The same thing happened in our hospitals, and ten years ago I was in bed in a ward where used syringes and dressings were in the dusty corners under the beds.

Cleaners in general are hard-working and want to do a good job. Like all workers they deserve decent treatment, and I’m pleased to be able to do what little I can to support their cause.

Photographically there isn’t a lot to say. Perhaps the image above raises one small issue in that it clearly shows the ID card worn by one of the people at the protest, though you can’t read it at this scale.  Often  I want to blur such information as names and bar-codes before sending images out, but on this occasion I forgot to do so.

There isn’t an obvious way to blur such details in Lightroom, but I find it is possible simply by using the Adjustment Brush to paint over them. Just select a value for Sharpness of -100 and brush over the area, and it will be effectively blurred. You can if you wish restore some of the visual weight by adding some Clarity, Contrast, Exposure and Highlight to taste, and of course can save it as a new brush with a suitable name. The two pictures look more or less the same, but the information is unreadable at any scale on the lower version.

Continue reading SOAS Cleaners

St Pat’s in Willesden Green

Saturday was one of those days when ‘logistics’ were very much at the forefront, and I left the Syrians disappearing into the Hyde Park underpass at 1.20pm and by 1.50pm I was walking along the side road next to Willesden Green station where the Brent St Patrick’s Day Parade was gathering.  Fortunately the trains were running normally on both parts of the Piccadilly and Jubilee lines, though it still involves a very long walk between platforms at Green Park.

Most years the Brent parade has actually been on St Patrick’s Day, but this year this was on Sunday, and the main London parade was taking place then, so Brent held its parade a day early.  There had been some doubt until a fairly short time previous as to whether it would take place at all, as Brent council like all others has been hit by the cuts, and one cut was the funding for community events such as this.  The parade went ahead despite this – and the mayor came along as usual, walking at the front with St Patrick.

Unlike the big London occasion, the Brent parade is truly a community event, and perhaps because of the uncertainty it was a little less so this year, without the usual large crowds on the streets. The weather hadn’t looked good earlier in the day, and it rained a little on this parade, and being on a Saturday was perhaps a reason for the schools being absent. Last year, when St Patrick’s day actually fell on a Saturday I’d noticed the crowds were down on previous occasions, such as the 2011 parade.

So compared to previous years it was just a little disappointing, though there were still people on the street to watch, particularly in front of some of the local bars, with people getting into the hats, the spirit and the Guinness of the event.

The parade ended at Willesden Green Library, where there were related events taking place, but by now I was getting rather cold and tired and it was time to go home. You can see more pictures in St Patrick’s Parade Brent.

Continue reading St Pat’s in Willesden Green

Syrians on the March

Syrians gathered in Belgrave Square for a noisy protest across the road from the Syrian Embassy for a march to Downing St on the second anniversary of the start of the uprising there, a fight against the Assad regime that gets bloodier and bloodier. In my report Syria – Two Years Fight for Freedom on My London Diary I quote some figures about the numbers killed by the brutal regime which “has so far killed over 70,000 people, injured 320,000, imprisoned 160,000, and caused several million to become refugees inside and outside of Syria.”  Syrians feel let down by the international community, which has largely stood back and watched this happen without managing to take any effective action – as I mention, one of the posters “included the question ‘Hey World, How Many Kids Should Be Killed Before You Do Something?'”

The Syrians were protesting in a fairly dense crowd inside a large pen, but unlike some events it was easy to move through and to get to the centre where things were happening. The people want publicity for their cause and a keen for the press to get good pictures, and with a few quiet words and gestures made way for me to move past. Almost everyone – men, women and children – was happy to be photographed, and very friendly. This, unlike some, was a crowd where I felt welcome.

Visually, the many Free Syrian flags often provided some drama – and it is a better flag to photograph than some with its black white and green bands and red stars, whether waved, worn or painted on faces.

The woman on the left in this image saw me taking photographs of hef friend and ruashed forwards to kiss her – this was the second or third frame as she turned round and smiled at me. I showed them the picture and they laughed. Most of the time I was working with the 16-35mm, and there was little room not to be very much in people’s faces, and that big lens (considerably larger than the 18-105mm DX) with its 77mm filter and large lens hood can be rather intimidating, but not I think with this crowd.

Most of the time I was too close to some of the people for flash to be an option, but although the light was fairly even overall – a dull overcast day with still the occasional spot of rain – I needed it for some of the pictures, for example where the face of this man was in shadow against a bright background.

I continued to take pictures for the first quarter mile of so of the march, and left it as the tail end disappeared below my feet into the Hyde Park underpass. Standing above as the march approached I wished I had put the 70-300mm into my camera bag that morning, although I’m not sure I would have made many good pictures.

Views from a height are seldom as interesting as I hope they will be, although probably the main reason I take few now is that climbing up on street furniture and walls is rather a strain for me now, and unless – as in this case – I’m on really solid ground I tend to lose balance and start shaking.

But a longer lens would have got a more compressed view when the march was approaching that would have been full of those flags. Here I used the lens at 66mm (99mm equiv) to take in more or less the whole width of the march, framing to get the banner at the bottom, at right and at top left to the edgies of the image. I rather like that the large banner is part obscured by the three men – two with megaphones – in front. It’s message is still clear and it’s sometimes good to leave a little for the viewer to do. One thing that didn’t quite work for me was that the young girl on her father’s shoulders at the centre of the banner has her held held firmly down – I would have liked her to be looking up at the camera.

  Continue reading Syrians on the March

Whittington’s Turn Again

Supporters of Whittington Hospital fought a hard and successful campaign back in 2010 against plans to cut its A&E and maternity services, but like many other London hospitals are now threatened by another round of cuts and closures, largely driven by the greed of friends of the government who would like the large amounts spent on the NHS to bleed into their pockets which lies behind much of the current NHS reforms.

Part of the proposals for the Whittington would see around a third of the site sold off for development and there would be wards closing with fewer beds available, reduced maternity services, and 570 jobs lost, in a area where existing provision is hard pressed with bed occupancy rates at 10% above recommended levels. So it isn’t surprising that there has again been a great public outcry, and the Defend the Whittington Hospital Coalition had called for another march.

It was a cold, wet morning, enough to put many off from coming to march a couple of the miles and stand in the rain listening to speeches, but there was still a hardcore of a couple of thousand supporters who turned up at the starting point by the time the march actually began. Earlier it had seemed rather empty, but many turned up sensibly – given the weather – at more or less the last minute.

As often, the protest was advertised with a time for people to meet an hour before the march was due to start. When going to cover the events I always try to arrive at the earlier time, or even sometimes a little before, as travelling times in London can be unpredictable. Often the time before a march starts is by far the most interesting for photographers, giving you time to work with people, and at some events there are speeches or other activities before the march sets off.

There was little happening when I arrived at Highbury & Islington on the morning, except for people – including one dressed as the Grim Reaper, wielding a scythe with the message ‘NHS Privatisation’ and others handing out placards at the station entrance, and a couple of hundred yards down the road a bus and a few people standing in the fairly light rain. But people were beginning to arrive and get ready and I started taking pictures.

Among the crowd that was building up were apparently a number of celebrities, few of whom I could recognise (partly because I don’t own a TV and seldom read the popular press), though occasionally there was a small crowd of photographers and fans who obviously did.

Among those I did know were the remarkable Hetty Bower who became a pacifist in 1914, and had marched all the way to the hospital in 1910 and was hoping to do so again today at the age of 107. There were some familiar politicians too, including Natalie Bennett the Green Party leader, though one local MP was noticeably absent.

As usual when it rains, I was holding a cloth on the front of the lens most of the time, and wiping the filter before taking pictures, but there were still a few frames made unusable by drops on the lens. I followed the march for a short distance up the road, and then rushed back to the station to go across London for another protest. Although it was some miles away, it was a fast journey on the Victoria Line and then a short hop on the Piccadilly, both of which were working normally that weekend.

More pictures at Whittington Hospital March Against Cuts on My London Diary.

Continue reading Whittington’s Turn Again

Tortured to Death

Sometimes its a problem trying to find a different picture when you are photographing a protest. Although the protesters themselves sometimes seem happy with just a lot of people behind a banner or holding up placards, pictures like that seldom have a great interest for those who weren’t there.

It helps if there are some interesting placards, whether because of the words or images on them, and a little animation in the people taking part often helps. People shouting or blowing horns or whistles often attracts attention and gets passers-by to look, but although it tends to attract photographers too, it often adds little to a still photograph – unless you are careful to ensure you capture it at a suitable moment. But protests where people just stand and talk to each other are often tricky to cover. Even worse if they turn away from the cameras when they do so.


Protesters tape up a poster of Arafat Jaradat

I don’t set things up to photograph, though if others set things up it sometimes provides opportunities, though I still try to take different photographs. But more often I’m looking out for things that are happening – like these two people putting up a poster on the wall.

The poster shows Arafat Jaradat, a Palestinian who died after being tortured in an Israeli jail, and whose death was the reason for the protest, outside the main London office of the security firm G4S who provide the security systems for the jail and interrogation centre – you can read about it and see more pictures in Tortured to Death in Israeli G4S Prison on My London Diary.

The placard and its message were a powerful graphic black and white statement, and I tried to present it a little differently by taking an image of one woman holding it, with intensely coloured blue headscarf and purple gloves. I thought it worked well with the dull orange of the office foyer behind (a very different colour temperature and less bright than the pavement outside.)


Posters and a banner outside the G4S offices in London

I tried to improve on the simple row of people holding up posters and the banner by including at left the face on the poster. With the 16mm there was perhaps an awkward empty area of pavement at the right, and the best picture came when one of the protesters – dressed in black and white to echo the poster – walked into frame. She apologised for getting in the way of my picture.


Uncorrected view from the 10.5mm semi-fisheye

The protesters were actually scattered over quite a wide area and it was hard to include more than a fraction of the over 20 people there in any one image. When I made a picture from a similar position with the 10.5mm fisheye I was careful to crop so as not to include the whole of the banner at right. I knew that I would get a curved arch above the line of protesters, which I think helps the image.

On My London Diary you can see several other pictures made with the 10.5mm, which often provides a different view. In most of them I’ve corrected the images to cylindrical perspective – as in this example. Particularly when there are people close to the edge of the frame they otherwise look distorted.


10.5mm image corrected – otherwise the woman at right would look very distorted.

But my main problems covering the event were to do with temperature, and this seemed to be one of the coldest places in London, with large buildings around perhaps channeling the bitter east wind through the area. Even though I’d dressed for the weather it was still too cold for me to stand around in one place for very long; I’d been outside taking pictures for several hours and I had to leave halfway through the protest.

Continue reading Tortured to Death

The Royals – 1984

The Royals – as every Londoner at least used to know – are not members of the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha family (or Windsor as they prefer to be known since 1917) but docks in London’s East End, the Royal Victoria, Albert and King George V, stretching between them from Canning Town to Cyprus – not the Meditteranean island but North Woolwich. Like the rest of London’s inner docks they closed long ago, back in the 1970s or so.

© Peter Marshall, 1984
King George V Dock, 1984

I never saw them at work, but started to photograph the area two years after the final closure of the in 1981 (they had been running down for some time), but before the area around them was in part developed.  It was a huge area – together they were said to be the largest enclosed docks in the world, with around 250 acres of water and a total area of over a thousand acres, almost 5 square kilometres.

It’s now the home to one of the UK’s cheapest and most expensive tourist attractions – cheap for the cost of the cable car ride from the terminal at the west end of the Victoria Dock and across the river to North Greenwich.  I had to be in docklands to give a talk yesterday lunchtime, and had planned to take a rather leisurely route home across it, but the weather defeated both me and it.

The ‘Arab dangleway’ isn’t a serious form of transport, but a modern ‘folly’ (and like that horrid  red metal tangled mass on the Olympic site and the new Routemaster example o what you get when you elect a clown as mayor.) According Darryl Chamberlain, the auuthor of the local  Greenwich 853 blog (named for the former telephone area code and definitive reading if you want to know what’s happening in the area) it has a total of 16 regular commuters; for most the Jubilee line to Canning Town and the easy change to the DLR are faster, more reliable and cheaper. As a visitor attraction, the cost for those with an Oyster or Travelcard is certaiinly cheap compared to most, but this is the most expensive cable car system ever built, and so far has cost taxpayers over £24 million (with around £30m from private finance) with another £8 million from the European Regional Development Fund.

On looking at the advance weather forecast I’d realised that my plans were to be dashed, with snow and high winds forecast – snow would obscure the views and the cable car doesn’t run when it’s windy, and I walked around Canary Wharf in a blizzard taking a few pictures on the coldest day in London for years finding it at times difficult to keep upright and clutching on to hand rails for support. The pictures weren’t much but if I hadn’t taken them I would have worried later about the opportunity I’d missed! But I had similar problems to our railways – it was obviously the wrong type of snow. At least I wasn’t bothered by security who were probably busier trying to keep warm than worrying about photographers, and the snow probably made the CCTV hard to follow.

But my talk was about my photographs of Docklands, to a small audience who knew more about the area than I did, but I had the advantage of having been there before them and could show a little of how things were in the late 1970s and early 1980s. I was showing only black and white work I’d made from when I started photographing London around 1974 until around ten years later. Much of that time my main photographic project was in Hull, but I’d also done a fair amount along both of London’s major rivers, the Thames and the Lee, including the former dock areas. And one of the more organised projects was on the Royals and the surrounding area.

I’d walked around the area, getting there by the train service that then ran from Stratford to North Woolwich, stopping at Canning Town and Silvertown (it would have been easier though probably not faster for me the following year when the service in May 1985 ran all the way from Richmond to North Woolwich) or taking a train to Woolwich Arsenal and then walking under the river or taking the free ferry to North Woolwich. Transport in the whole docklands area has certainly improved since then, with the Jubilee Line extended to Stratford and the DLR. Even the bus services are generally better.

Although shipping into the Royals had stopped, the two eastern docks – Albert and George V – were still mainly fenced off with gates closed and security men at the main gatehouse, with a few small businesses still operating on the site. So although I could take some pictures around them – and in an area close to the dock entrance where some of the fences had gone, I had to write to the PLA and ask for access to take photographs, getting permission to work on the site for two days. (To the west the Royal Victoria was privately owned and I was unable to get inside.)

© Peter Marshall, 1984
King George V Dock, 1984

It was a strange feeling, wandering around the largely empty dockside, the only person in a vast area full of semi-derelict buildings. There were still a few signs of life, with washing drying on one small vessel and a car parked outside a small office at one edge of the site – and another small business stil operating in one corner of the site. And one solitary rower training on the mile and a quarter of open water in the Royal Albert – other than him I saw only one other person during two days there. As I wandered around, there were many signs of those who had worked there, particularly the Lascar seamen who, according to  FamilySearchmade up perhaps 20 percent of the British maritime labor force in the early 20th century, with their total exceeding 26 percent by 1938.”

© Peter Marshall, 2009
Ashura procession, London, 2009

From various largely Muslim areas of India, Pakistan and other points east, they crewed many of the engine rooms, galleys and other areas of British ships, and when in docks such as the Royals continued their religious celebrations. On what our dockers referred to as ‘Hobson-Jobson days’, the held religious processions inside the docks. The name, best known as the title of the Anglo-Indian lexicon by Yule and Burnell produced in the 1870s, came from the British soldier’s version of the cry ‘Ya Hasan! Ya Husayn!’ (O Hassan! O Husain!) in the annual Shi’ite Ashura processions mourning the killing of Imam Husain in the Karbala massacre of 680 AD.

© Peter Marshall, 1984
King George V Dock, 1984

The planning enquiry into the building of London City airport had already begun, and demolition on the site for it started not long after I took my pictures, with the airport opening around 3 years later. For noise reasons it was allowed on the basis it would be usede by a very limited service of special planes that could take off and land at a steep angle, but a dozen years later the airport operators got permission to extend the runway to allow a wider range of planes to use it, and more recently part of the airport has been extended over the water of King George dock to enable even more flights and greater noise and pollution for the many residents in the surrouding areas of London. Like Heathrow, it’s an airport that was allowed in the wrong place and has grown by a process of deliberate misleading of the public and authorities. Like Heathrow further expansion is impractical. Unlike Heathrow it has a reputation for being a good place to travel from.

© Peter Marshall, 1984
King George V Dock, 1984

Some of the smaller offices and other buildings had been left as if those working there had just gone out to lunch, with part drunk cups of tea, the odd coat hanging on a peg, and paperwork and rubber stamps on the desks. There were notices and posters still on the wall, along with the odd drawing and fading pictures from pornographic magazines.

© Peter Marshall, 1984
King George V Dock, 1984

This is a project I’ve shown little work from over the years, partly because I had great problems printing some of the images, but more because I moved on to other things. I hope shortly to bring out a body of the work in another book, and possibly also on the web.

Continue reading The Royals – 1984