{"id":975,"date":"2010-04-18T15:16:51","date_gmt":"2010-04-18T15:16:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=975"},"modified":"2010-04-18T15:16:51","modified_gmt":"2010-04-18T15:16:51","slug":"red-chalk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=975","title":{"rendered":"RED Chalk"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday I saw a man arrested by police for chalking on a pavement &#8211; the charge was &#8216;criminal damage.&#8217;\u00a0 I spent years chalking on blackboards in a teaching career without ever being charged with anything more than terminal boredom. Chalk doesn&#8217;t damage boards or stone and wipes away without trace.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mylondondiary.co.uk\/2010\/04\/14\/20100414-d0103.jpg\" title=\"\u00a9 2010, Peter Marshall\" alt=\"\u00a9 2010, Peter Marshall\" height=\"298\" width=\"450\" \/><\/p>\n<p>I have a small confession to make that might get me banned from some competitions. That stick of chalk he is holding didn&#8217;t actually look very red in my photograph. The way that my flash caught it made it a very pale pink, and it took a little bit of Lightroom magic to get it looking red in the picture.<\/p>\n<p>The flash too was a little too bright on the officer&#8217;s jacket and especially its reflective strips, and that too took a little taming.<\/p>\n<p>Almost all of my photographs get a certain amount of corrective work, but its aim is always to make the picture seem natural and to reflect how I saw the scene when I took the picture.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t want people to look at one of my pictures and think that I&#8217;ve vignetted it or altered it in some way, really I don&#8217;t want them to think at all about the techniques, just to see and respond to the image.<\/p>\n<p>Of course with digital images there is a certain amount of technical information embedded in them (unless you deliberately remove it.) So the EXIF data on this frame tells me I was working at ISO 640 (it was quite a dull day) that the exposure was\u00a0 1\/320 f6.3, the focal length 16mm and the subject distance 400mm &#8211; about 16 inches if like me you grew up in pre-decimal days. It also tells me that the flash did fire, that I was using an exposure bias of 1\/3 stop and a few other things like the exact time according to my camera.<\/p>\n<p>It doesn&#8217;t &#8211; so far as I can see &#8211; tell me I was shooting with the flash set at -1 stop and was probably using it in through the lens balanced flash mode. I think the camera ignores the flash exposure and sets the aperture and shutter speed on the ambient light only, but I don&#8217;t think the manual makes this clear.<\/p>\n<p>Several things strike me about this, other than the evident absurdity of the alleged offence. First is that until fairly recently the fastest synchronisation speed on any of the cameras I worked with was around 1\/100th second and that using fill-flash would have involved some tricky calculations that would have made it virtually impossible for pictures like this.<\/p>\n<p>The second thing is that distance of 16 inches, I think from me to the hand holding the chalk. I was certainly working fairly close, but still making sure I wasn&#8217;t impeding the officer in his duty. I&#8217;m surprised it was quite that close, but things do look a little different when you are viewing the world through a 16mm lens. But had I moved back at that point, I would soon have been trying to photograph through the back of another photographer. A few seconds later, there was a ring of police and PCSO&#8217;s surrounding the man and I had to work from further back.<\/p>\n<p>You can read more about the event and see the pictures in <a href=\"http:\/\/mylondondiary.co.uk\/2010\/04\/apr.htm#terror\" target=\"_blank\">Olympia Counter Terror Expo Exposed<\/a> on My London Diary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday I saw a man arrested by police for chalking on a pavement &#8211; the charge was &#8216;criminal damage.&#8217;\u00a0 I spent years chalking on blackboards in a teaching career without ever being charged with anything more than terminal boredom. Chalk doesn&#8217;t damage boards or stone and wipes away without trace. I have a small &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=975\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">RED Chalk<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,6,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-my-own-work","category-photo-issues","category-technical"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/975\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}