{"id":328,"date":"2008-07-02T09:37:59","date_gmt":"2008-07-02T09:37:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=328"},"modified":"2008-07-02T09:37:59","modified_gmt":"2008-07-02T09:37:59","slug":"a-genuine-richard-prince-photograph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=328","title":{"rendered":"A genuine Richard Prince photograph?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll let you into a secret. <em>Richard Prince<\/em> does actually take photographs, or at least I think he may. Not many &#8211; most of the time he&#8217;s happier ripping off other people&#8217;s work, to the extent of $3.4 million for his photograph of a <em>Marlboro<\/em> cowboy ad.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t really understand why anyone would want to pay that sort of money. It&#8217;s not a picture I would want on my wall, but if I did why not just go out and make my own copy for considerably less. It does seem to be an awful lot to pay for what is essentially a can of the artist&#8217;s excrement (<em>Piero Manzoni\u00a0<\/em> got to that first.)<\/p>\n<p>There is a nice story in an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/arts-entertainment\/art-and-architecture\/features\/how-did-richard-prince-produce-the-most-expensive-photograph-ever-850589.html\" target=\"_blank\">Independent feature<\/a> by Charles Darwent published just before the opening of Prince&#8217;s show &#8216;<em>Continuation<\/em>&#8216; (at the <em>Serpentine Gallery<\/em> in Hyde Park, London until 7 Sept, 2008) in which he finds a rip-off of one of his &#8216;<em>Girlfriend<\/em>&#8216; series on the cover of <em>French Vogue<\/em> and reacts indignantly to them stealing &#8216;his&#8217; work. (These were readers\u0092 girlfriend photos ripped from the personal pages of biker mags and re-photographed by Prince.)<\/p>\n<p>You can also read a review of the show in the same newspaper by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/arts-entertainment\/art-and-architecture\/reviews\/richard-prince-continuation-serpentine-gallery-london-855277.html\" target=\"_blank\">Sue Hubbard<\/a>, which I think gives an clear view of the man and his work.<\/p>\n<p>I do actually think his art is of some interest, but also that photography is something rather different (and rather more important), and we shouldn&#8217;t really waste much if any of its limited cultural space on work that basically just isn&#8217;t photography.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.richardprinceart.com\/upstate.html\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Richard Prince<\/em><\/a> isn&#8217;t a photographer.  Or not much of one.  Take a look at his web site, and under \u0091photographs\u0092 I think there are possibly a few that were really seen and taken by him. Perhaps the series &#8216;<em>Upstate Photographs<\/em>&#8216; is his own work (though equally it could be an album he picked up in a yard sale.)<\/p>\n<p>Finally, thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jmcolberg.com\/weblog\/2008\/06\/shame_hes_a_onetrick_pony.html\" target=\"_blank\"><em>J\u00f6rg Colberg&#8217;s Conscientious<\/em><\/a> for pointing me to two rather wacky reviews, one in the Observer &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/arts.guardian.co.uk\/art\/visualart\/story\/0,,2288033,00.html\" target=\"_blank\">Shame he&#8217;s a one-trick pony<\/a>&#8216; and a second, which may, as Colberg suggests, lack logic, but I think tells the reader rather more about the work, <em>Bidisha<\/em>&#8216;s Guardian blog, &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/art\/2008\/06\/girls_cars_and_body_parts_rich.html\" target=\"_blank\">Girls, cars and body parts: Richard Prince&#8217;s shallow American dream<\/a>&#8216;  &#8211; and don&#8217;t fail to read the comments. In particular <em>arthouart <\/em>writes &#8220;<em>What really is at issue is the bankruptcy of irony in Art, like most of Prince&#8217;s work its an insider one liner, if you don&#8217;t get it you don&#8217;t belong.<\/em>&#8221; Which perhaps gets to the root of why I think I&#8217;ve wasted far too much time on this already and should apologise to readers and return to the real world and photography.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ll let you into a secret. Richard Prince does actually take photographs, or at least I think he may. Not many &#8211; most of the time he&#8217;s happier ripping off other people&#8217;s work, to the extent of $3.4 million for his photograph of a Marlboro cowboy ad. I don&#8217;t really understand why anyone would want &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=328\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A genuine Richard Prince photograph?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photo-issues","category-reviews-etc"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}