{"id":2028,"date":"2013-04-08T22:09:58","date_gmt":"2013-04-08T22:09:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=2028"},"modified":"2013-04-08T22:09:58","modified_gmt":"2013-04-08T22:09:58","slug":"writing-through-ones-hat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=2028","title":{"rendered":"Writing Through One&#8217;s Hat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I wasn&#8217;t quite sure why <em>A D Coleman<\/em> was writing about the as yet unpublished\u00a0 &#8216;<em>How to Talk\u00a0About Books You Haven\u2019t Read&#8217;<\/em>, by Pierre\u00a0Bayard in his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/\">Nearby Caf\u00e9 Photocritic International<\/a> post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/2013\/03\/27\/how-to-talk-through-your-hat-1\/\" target=\"_blank\">How to Talk Through Your Hat (1)<\/a> and making the connection between the author&#8217;s name and one of the pioneers of photography, <a href=\"http:\/\/photographyhistory.blogspot.co.uk\/2012\/01\/bayard-forgotten-pionner.html\" target=\"_blank\">Hippolyte Bayard<\/a> seemed rather a weak link &#8211; especially as Coleman says &#8220;<em>I\u2019ve yet to determine whether he\u2019s related<\/em>&#8220;. But of course I knew and trusted that he would at some point get to the point.<\/p>\n<p>And of course he does, if only in his later post, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/2013\/03\/31\/how-to-talk-through-your-hat-2\/\" target=\"_blank\">How to Talk Through Your Hat (2)<\/a>, where he talks about the development of his own critical practice, where he increasingly realised the need to make &#8220;<em>careful description and formal analysis<\/em>&#8221; central to his reviews, although as he says, &#8220;<em>it\u2019s hard to make description and formal analysis interesting to read, more so certainly than interpretation and evaluation<\/em>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s an approach that I&#8217;ve also very much tried to take in the best of my attempts at critical writing about photography &#8211; and forced students to take in their critical studies of photographers when I was teaching, giving them a formal structure which started with these aspects, even though it was anathema to academic practice at the time. As I wrote long ago, most writers on photography would rather do anything than actually look at the pictures.<\/p>\n<p>And this, rather more elegantly, is what Bayard and Coleman are saying. Coleman of course has pointed it out long before, as he says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><em>As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/photocriticism\/members\/archivetexts\/photocriticism\/coleman\/colemansherman.html\" target=\"_blank\">I pointed out<\/a>\u00a0back in 1997, you can peruse the entire English-language \u201cdiscourse\u201d around Cindy Sherman\u2019s \u201cUntitled Film Stills\u201d without encountering any substantive engagement with the particulars of any one image of hers<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>He goes on to say that most theoretical writing about images tends not to discus its actual content, but &#8220;<em>the literal subject matter, and their personal response thereto \u2015 equivalent to assessing a C\u00e9zanne still life according to your preferences in fruit.<\/em>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But you need to read his posts, rather than mine, and I gather from the bottom of the second post that we can expect a third on this series.<\/p>\n<p>I read rather a clear example of writing about photographs without any real attempt to look at the actual content the other day in a review of the current Winogrand retrospective at SFMOMA. <em>Caille Millner<\/em>&#8216;s review in the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/art\/article\/Garry-Winogrand-s-uneasy-eye-4377685.php\" target=\"_blank\"> San Francisco Chronicle<\/a> was drawn to my attention in a post by <em>Joerg Colberg<\/em> on <a href=\"http:\/\/jmcolberg.com\/weblog\/extended\/archives\/the_ethics_of_street_photography\/\" target=\"_blank\">The Ethics of Street Photograph<\/a>y (his link to it may work if mine hits the paywall) and seems to me a near perfect example of someone writing about images without actually seeing the actual content, producing a diatribe based on her reaction to his literal subject &#8211; or one of them &#8211; women.<\/p>\n<p>Millner seems to have little idea of who Winogrand was or what he was doing &#8211; or with how it changed what other photographers do, and to be completely unprepared to engage with them. She could have looked at a Picasso show and come out with the same response (probably with more justification) about his attitudes to women.<\/p>\n<p>I think Winogrands attitudes and images were considerably more complex than she imagines, and although when I wrote a lengthy essay on him some years ago I wasn&#8217;t entirely uncritical of his approach to women, I didn&#8217;t mistake this as the point of his work. But unlike her I knew his work, and looked at the pictures, including those in my copy of his &#8216;<em>Women Are Beautiful<\/em>&#8216; (I got it reduced to \u00a34.50 and it now sells at $450 upwards) and didn&#8217;t have the same axe to grind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I wasn&#8217;t quite sure why A D Coleman was writing about the as yet unpublished\u00a0 &#8216;How to Talk\u00a0About Books You Haven\u2019t Read&#8217;, by Pierre\u00a0Bayard in his Nearby Caf\u00e9 Photocritic International post How to Talk Through Your Hat (1) and making the connection between the author&#8217;s name and one of the pioneers of photography, Hippolyte Bayard &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=2028\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Writing Through One&#8217;s Hat<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,6,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-my-own-work","category-photo-issues","category-photographers"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2028"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2035,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2028\/revisions\/2035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}