{"id":15302,"date":"2023-10-08T08:37:00","date_gmt":"2023-10-08T07:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=15302"},"modified":"2023-10-05T11:16:23","modified_gmt":"2023-10-05T10:16:23","slug":"free-speech-pfi-debt-2013","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/?p=15302","title":{"rendered":"Free Speech & PFI Debt – 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Free Speech & PFI Debt<\/strong> – Ten years ago on Tuesday 8th October 2013 I photographed two protests in London, the first against a controversial law which prevents some campaigning by organisations in the year before a general election and the second over the effect of huge repayments of PFI debts that are severely affecting the ability to provide proper hospital services – a result of misguided policy decisions by previous governments and poor agreements made by civil servants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Don’t Gag Free Speech – Parliament Square<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"Free<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Campaigners in Parliament Square opposed the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill which was being debated that day in Parliament in what was somewhere between a staged photo-opportunity and a protest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Free<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The name of the Bill (and the Act which came into force in 2014) is something of a mouthful as it combined three quite different things. Establishing a register of consultant lobbyists seemed long overdue, although it seemed unlikely to reduce the scandalous effect of lobbying by groups such as fossil fuel companies on government policies – and clearly has not as recent decisions on Rosebank and other environmental issues has shown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Free<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But the restrictions on the campaigning activities by charities and other “third party organisations” in the year before a general election was extremely controversial. So controversial that it was opposed by an incredibly wide range of voluntary organisations<\/a>, “including Action for Blind People, Action for Children, the British Heart Foundation, the Campaign to Protect Rural England, the Countryside Alliance, Guide Dogs, Islamic Relief UK, Hope not Hate, the National Federation of Women\u2019s Institutes, the Royal British Legion, the RSPB and the Salvation Army<\/em>.” All saw that their legitimate activities in pursuing their charitable and other aims could be limited by the new legislation at least one year in four.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Free<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The third section of the bill would effect the ability of trade unions to play a full role in informing and advising members in ways that might influence how they should vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Many saw the bill as an attack on free speech and something that could be used to silence critics of the government in the run-up to general elections, while failing to address the problems of lobbying by vested interests which could continue so long as the lobbyists were registered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Rather than the mouthful of its full name, the Bill was widely referred to as the “lobbying bill”, or by its many critics as the “gagging bill” and this was reflected in some of those protesting having tape across their mouths, as well as in posters and placards. Although the bill became law it has perhaps had less effect than many of the campaigners feared, probably because of its lack of clarity. But it remains in law as a failure to deal with lobbying and a threat to free speech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More pictures at Don’t Gag Free Speech<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Scrap Royal London NHS PFI Debt – Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) was a disastrous system which enabled essential government expenditure to be taken off the books. Essentially it involved in disguising borrowing by the government to build schools and hospitals etc by getting money from the private sector for these works and then paying these back over long periods of time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But rather than the government paying back the loans for new hospitals, these would be paid back by the NHS through the various health trusts. It made no real sense, but made the figures for government borrowing look better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Things were made worse, firstly by the private sector negotiators of the agreements running rings around those from the public sector inexperienced in such things meaning the contracts are far too favourable to them. Then we had the financial crash and the Tory-imposed austerity. Health trusts found themselves in an impossible situation, which required some radical government action. Even the Tories were eventually forced to do something, and in 2020, over \u00a313 billion of NHS debt was scrapped; this good news came together with a wider package of NHS reforms in part intended to allow them to cope with Covid, and I’m unclear of what the overall effect will be in the longer term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Barts Health Trust which covers much of East London, including Barts, The Royal London, Newham General, Whipps Cross and London Chest Hospital, as well as many smaller community facilities has been particularly badly hit, with PFI payments of \u00a3129m a year to a private consortium who financed the new (and much needed) Royal London Hospital. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Barts Health Trust needs to cut \u00a378m from the services it provides and planned to do so by downgrading the posts of many of its staff, paying them less for doing the same work, or rather doing more work, as there will be increasing staff shortages with vacancies being deliberately left unfilled. In any case new staff will be unwilling to come and work for a trust that wants to pay them less than their experience and qualifications merit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Barts were also proposing to close departments such as A&E at Whipps Cross or Newham and for the population of East London things are made worse by proposed closures in neighbouring health trusts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The rally began on a narrow pavement on the busy Whitechapel Road outside the hospital but after police told the organisers it was too dangerous moved onto the access road in front of the new PFI financed hospital where they had previously been denied permission to protest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Although the hospital has a new building, financial problems have prevented them from making use of the top two floors – and for two days recently had been unable to admit any new patients as no beds were available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

More at Scrap Royal London NHS PFI Debt<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Free Speech & PFI Debt – Ten years ago on Tuesday 8th October 2013 I photographed two protests in London, the first against a controversial law which prevents some campaigning by organisations in the year before a general election and the second over the effect of huge repayments of PFI debts that are severely affecting … Continue reading Free Speech & PFI Debt – 2013<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,7],"tags":[1941,14105,12065,12068,14111,14117,14104,14113,14112,1814,14119,14122,14116,5937,7840,17,14120,14106,14107,3399,83,9395,14108,14115,16,14118,14110,14109,7742,14114,14121,7994,2590,1751],"class_list":["post-15302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-my-own-work","category-political-issues","tag-1941","tag-arliament-square","tag-barts","tag-barts-health-trust","tag-chariteis","tag-debt","tag-dont-gag","tag-elections","tag-environmental-organisations","tag-free-speech","tag-health-trusts","tag-huge-cuts","tag-loans","tag-lobbying","tag-lobbyists","tag-london","tag-newham-general","tag-non-party-campaigning","tag-non-party-campaigning-and-trade-union-administration","tag-nurses","tag-peter-marshall","tag-pfi-debt","tag-photo-opportunity","tag-private-finance-initiative","tag-protest","tag-public-sector-debt","tag-register-of-lobbyists","tag-right-to-lobby","tag-royal-london-hospital","tag-silencing-citics","tag-the-royal-london","tag-vested-interests","tag-whipps-cross","tag-whitechapel"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15302"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15303,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15302\/revisions\/15303"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}