Two recent articles I’ve read on other sites that I think you might be interested in, both with some fine photographs as illustrations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Can Photojournalists Be Entirely Objective?<\/a> on Artsy, Kelsey Ables looks at the problem that photographers have in “today\u2019s social media\u2013oriented political landscape “of following the NPPA Code of Ethics instructions to \u201crecognize and work to avoid presenting one\u2019s own biases in the work<\/em>\u201d and to \u201cresist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities<\/em>.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n If you are a regular reader you will know what I think of photo-ops. A few years ago I was involved in a NUJ attempt to produce a code of ethic and came to very much appreciate the problems involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The second piece is more entertaining, and is a feature on Aperture advertising an Aperture\/Magnum print sale, now over. 15 Photographers Reveal What\u2019s Hidden in Their Work<\/a> and the pictures were among the over 120 included with roughly postcard size (6×6 inches) prints selling for $100 a piece with an undisclosed percentage going to Aperture. If you’ve a a spare $100 and want to support Aperture take out a magazine subscription, which will get you many more images printed high quality and mainly rather larger. I subscribed for many years but recently gave it up partly because I already have far too many books and magazines around the house, but also because frankly it just isn’t as interesting as it used to be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The pictures are accompanied by short comments by the photographers (quotations from previous writing by those who are no longer with us.) There are a few of the 15 I’d hang on my own wall if I had a rather larger than postcard copy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Two recent articles I’ve read on other sites that I think you might be interested in, both with some fine photographs as illustrations. In Can Photojournalists Be Entirely Objective? on Artsy, Kelsey Ables looks at the problem that photographers have in “today\u2019s social media\u2013oriented political landscape “of following the NPPA Code of Ethics instructions to … Continue reading Elsewhere<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1084,1085,1083,1087,1086],"class_list":["post-10183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photo-issues","tag-aperture","tag-little-prints","tag-magnum","tag-photo-ops","tag-photographic-ethics"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10183"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10183\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10185,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10183\/revisions\/10185"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-photo.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
I’m not quite sure what makes a postcard size print “museum quality<\/em>” though these are “signed or estate-stamped<\/em>“, and quite frankly I think a waste of money. <\/p>\n\n\n\n